Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Greetings and a question

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

,

Our holiday was something of a bust. I had a bad muscle strain in my side and a bit of a stomach bug jst before Christmas and my mother developed a nasty bladder infection just as I was getting over what I had. She's still not over her thing and will be going to the doctor tomorrow about it.

As for the other thing, I don't know what to suggest on that. Maybe speaking to someone at the health services and also at a place where they train helper animals might help. Someone at those places should know how to help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In which country do you live? Many leases in Canada state " no pets "

however that is an impossible clause to enforce, even if it is not a

medical necessity for the leasee.

Raven

>

> HI. I'm new to the group. I hope everyon's holidays were calm! I

> have a question. Has anyone successfully battled a rental

property

> agent over having a pet that is considered a medical (emotional)

> necessity and the lease says no pets?

> david

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum .

Thanks for the good holiday hopes and the same to you.

The answer to your other question is that I have never battled a

rental property agent over such a thing. But I know this much:

If you signed the lease and the lease says " No pets " then you are in

violation of the lease.

HOWEVER, in all states in the US, rental property owners are not

allowed to discriminate on the basis of " handicaps. " If you can

afford to pay the lease, then you ought to be able to rent an

aprtment.

So if a blind man with a seeing eye dog wanted to rent an apartment

in a " no pets " building, that man ought to be allowed to rent an

apartment within the building:

www.nationalfairhousing.org/ html/archives/seeing_eye_dog.pdf

" On December 11, 2002, a settlement was reached in which the owner

of an eight-unit apartment building at 168 Santa Clara Avenue in San

Bruno, CA has agreed to pay $88,000 to resolve a fair housing

lawsuit. The lawsuit alleged that the apartment owner, Simin Nejat,

refused to rent an apartment to and Alfred Gagne because Mrs.

Gagne is blind and uses a guide dog. Despite repeated efforts by the

Gagnes and by a representative from " Guide Dogs for the Blind " to

explain that the guide dog was a service animal and not a pet, the

owner refused to allow the guide dog.

" The undisputed evidence established that the landlord violated the

federal Fair Housing Act as well as related state laws, which make

it unlawful to discriminate in the rental of a dwelling because of a

disability. The Act also makes it unlawful to refuse to rent to

someone because they use a service animal. Mrs. Gagne will receive

the first payment in her settlement by January 24, 2003. "

I would assume that if you can see, the burden of proof that you

need a dog for medical purposes is upon your shoulders. A doctor's

note ought to suffice.

I am not a lawyer however, and so do not know if any of this advice

cust the mustard or not.

Tom

>

HI. I'm new to the group. I hope everyon's holidays were calm! I

have a question. Has anyone successfully battled a rental property

agent over having a pet that is considered a medical (emotional)

necessity and the lease says no pets?

> david

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...