Guest guest Posted December 27, 2004 Report Share Posted December 27, 2004 , Our holiday was something of a bust. I had a bad muscle strain in my side and a bit of a stomach bug jst before Christmas and my mother developed a nasty bladder infection just as I was getting over what I had. She's still not over her thing and will be going to the doctor tomorrow about it. As for the other thing, I don't know what to suggest on that. Maybe speaking to someone at the health services and also at a place where they train helper animals might help. Someone at those places should know how to help you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2004 Report Share Posted December 27, 2004 In which country do you live? Many leases in Canada state " no pets " however that is an impossible clause to enforce, even if it is not a medical necessity for the leasee. Raven > > HI. I'm new to the group. I hope everyon's holidays were calm! I > have a question. Has anyone successfully battled a rental property > agent over having a pet that is considered a medical (emotional) > necessity and the lease says no pets? > david Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2004 Report Share Posted December 27, 2004 Welcome to the forum . Thanks for the good holiday hopes and the same to you. The answer to your other question is that I have never battled a rental property agent over such a thing. But I know this much: If you signed the lease and the lease says " No pets " then you are in violation of the lease. HOWEVER, in all states in the US, rental property owners are not allowed to discriminate on the basis of " handicaps. " If you can afford to pay the lease, then you ought to be able to rent an aprtment. So if a blind man with a seeing eye dog wanted to rent an apartment in a " no pets " building, that man ought to be allowed to rent an apartment within the building: www.nationalfairhousing.org/ html/archives/seeing_eye_dog.pdf " On December 11, 2002, a settlement was reached in which the owner of an eight-unit apartment building at 168 Santa Clara Avenue in San Bruno, CA has agreed to pay $88,000 to resolve a fair housing lawsuit. The lawsuit alleged that the apartment owner, Simin Nejat, refused to rent an apartment to and Alfred Gagne because Mrs. Gagne is blind and uses a guide dog. Despite repeated efforts by the Gagnes and by a representative from " Guide Dogs for the Blind " to explain that the guide dog was a service animal and not a pet, the owner refused to allow the guide dog. " The undisputed evidence established that the landlord violated the federal Fair Housing Act as well as related state laws, which make it unlawful to discriminate in the rental of a dwelling because of a disability. The Act also makes it unlawful to refuse to rent to someone because they use a service animal. Mrs. Gagne will receive the first payment in her settlement by January 24, 2003. " I would assume that if you can see, the burden of proof that you need a dog for medical purposes is upon your shoulders. A doctor's note ought to suffice. I am not a lawyer however, and so do not know if any of this advice cust the mustard or not. Tom > HI. I'm new to the group. I hope everyon's holidays were calm! I have a question. Has anyone successfully battled a rental property agent over having a pet that is considered a medical (emotional) necessity and the lease says no pets? > david Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.