Re: justisse

[Guest guest]



I agree, Mr. Kippley, that all those who teach NFP and do so in the name of the Church should certainly hold to such standards. This list, however, is for those with a special interest in NFP and I'm not sure we need to limit it to Catholic or otherwise orthodox users who believe in the evils of contraception.

I know there are some on this list who approach NFP from a "naturalistic" or even "feministic" angle. Though this may be less than ideal to some of us, we all know the power of adopting an NFP philosophy and how lives can be changed without any intention to do so.

Regardless, I think all pro-NFP opinions should be welcome here.

Mike

Re: Re: IntroductionI don't see any copyrighted images language materials etc on the justisse website. Looks original. There are many mucus, sympto-thermal etc. methods and they are based on similar (sometimes even identical) principals yes, but that would not be a copyright infringement. Rose,Are there any copyright issues between Justisse and Creighton? Theyseem awfully similar.-->> Hello, I am new to the group and wanted to introduce myself. > > I have been charting my cycles for more than 8 years and am currently> taking a secular fertility awareness instructor training program in> Edmonton, Canada. I help facilitate a monthly volunteer charting> circle that mainly reaches women in their '20s and '30s. I am really> passionate about the empowering benefits that cycle charting has for> women. > > http://www.justisseca/new/research.asp> > Rose__________________________________________________________Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.