Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 I had a debate with a professor at collage on isometrics principles. He requested me to give the crux of Dr. Muller & Hettinger findings. With my limited knowledge on this subject I conclude the following is the essence of their findings by going through their research papers even though I really cannot fully understand what they say. Please correct me if I am wrong. 7 seconds isometric hold with 70% of maximum strength 5 days a week is the best for strength development. They also found one set is better than multiple sets. With this they found strength increase up to 5% a week. Can any one can verify the above understanding of mine is correct. Please help me if I have left out any of their valuable research findings. You guy's help is appreciated in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 If you go to the links section of this group, you will find a nice summary of Hettinger's research. > > I had a debate with a professor at collage on isometrics principles. > He requested me to give the crux of Dr. Muller & Hettinger findings. > With my limited knowledge on this subject I conclude the following is > the essence of their findings by going through their research papers > even though I really cannot fully understand what they say. Please > correct me if I am wrong. > > 7 seconds isometric hold with 70% of maximum strength 5 days a week is > the best for strength development. They also found one set is better > than multiple sets. With this they found strength increase up to 5% a > week. > > Can any one can verify the above understanding of mine is > correct. Please help me if I have left out any of their valuable > research findings. You guy's help is appreciated in advance. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2006 Report Share Posted May 21, 2006 I think you have summarized Hettinger correctly. To my knowledge, no researcher has ever proven these conclusions to be in error. Keep in mind, Hettinger was measuring static strength, nothing else. He was not measuring dynamic strength nor muscle mass. These attributes are where some other researchers have gone and that MAY explain what you have seen by way of being confused. Also, keep in mind that while there are TONS of theories on how to best use Isos and the BW, not many of these theories have been researched. For example, the so called isotonic reps with the BW are simply what the original manual writers put in the manual. Hettinger did not deal with isotonic reps, as far as I know. Hope that helps a bit. > > > > > > I had a debate with a professor at collage on > > isometrics > > principles. > > > He requested me to give the crux of Dr. Muller & > > Hettinger > > findings. > > > With my limited knowledge on this subject I > > conclude the following > > is > > > the essence of their findings by going through > > their research > > papers > > > even though I really cannot fully understand what > > they say. > > Please > > > correct me if I am wrong. > > > > > > 7 seconds isometric hold with 70% of maximum > > strength 5 days a > > week is > > > the best for strength development. They also found > > one set is > > better > > > than multiple sets. With this they found strength > > increase up to > > 5% a > > > week. > > > > > > Can any one can verify the above understanding of > > mine is > > > correct. Please help me if I have left out any of > > their valuable > > > research findings. You guy's help is appreciated > > in advance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.