Guest guest Posted February 10, 2004 Report Share Posted February 10, 2004 Good example Randy! I agree with you...sometimes your thumb hurts because you hit it with a hammer not because you carry around a story about a painful thumb. But there's always somthing " storylike " to investigate if that's your proclivity. For example you may want to investigate the story about why you always hit your thumb when you use a hammer. I think people need to lighten up about this stuff--the " Work " is not serious stuff! Eddie > >Reply-To: Loving-what-is >To: Loving-what-is >Subject: Re: Righteous Anger! (Vajra) >Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 03:15:19 -0000 > >Neo-- > >I have been reading your and others' posts for a couple weeks now, >and you seem to take concepts of " The Work " to such absurd extremes >that I truly wonder if you have any thoughts of your own or whether >you simply parrot the words of Byron all day long. > >Here is one of your recent statements: " I NEVER encounter another >human being or object in the world, I just >experience the story I am running about that person or object. " > >I would prefer not to be extreme in my examples, but it seems like a >good strategy to help you understand that we live in a real world, >not one of airy-fairy -isms. You say you NEVER encounter >another human being or object, that you just experience the story >blah, blah, blah. What if you step off a curb into a rushing >truck. I guarantee you that you will have certainly encountered >this rushing object and also that you would have no story about it >because you would be either hurt very bad or dead. But then, >according to you " NOTHING " could EVER hurt you. Well, I disagree. > > >Here I quote you: " If I have painful feelings they are ALWAYS >caused ONLY by the story (thoughts) I am attached to. " If you >survive the truck collision you might have a story about it. But >can you really be so sure that the painful feelings you have weren't >caused by the truck? > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Choose now from 4 levels of MSN Hotmail Extra Storage - no more account overload! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200362ave/direct/01/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2004 Report Share Posted February 10, 2004 Dear Randyb, > Neo-- > > I have been reading your and others' posts for a couple weeks now, > and you seem to take concepts of " The Work " to such absurd extremes > that I truly wonder if you have any thoughts of your own or whether > you simply parrot the words of Byron all day long. Does it not seem to you that he beliefs what he says? And is considering what he says? If so, how could it be parroting? > Here is one of your recent statements: " I NEVER encounter another > human being or object in the world, I just > experience the story I am running about that person or object. " > > I would prefer not to be extreme in my examples, but it seems like a > good strategy to help you understand that we live in a real world, > not one of airy-fairy -isms. You say you NEVER encounter > another human being or object, that you just experience the story > blah, blah, blah. What if you step off a curb into a rushing > truck. I guarantee you that you will have certainly encountered > this rushing object and also that you would have no story about it > because you would be either hurt very bad or dead. But then, > according to you " NOTHING " could EVER hurt you. Well, I disagree. Oh dear, please be extreme! That is what it takes sometimes to become realized, haven't you noticed? All of this is not about the world not being material. It is about how you interpret the material. Take death, for instance. What is death if you leave away your interpretation. Take a dead body, do you find death there? Can you take a microscope and show it to us? What about the different " leafes " ( I don't know the proper word ) of grass? do they exist, before you look at them? Any person is a story of yours. I'm not saying it's not a person or a car. But don't you FIRST have a story of a person and THEN interact with her? Imagine how far that can take you. I remember having had some trouble understanding it, but that last example made it clear to me. > Here I quote you: " If I have painful feelings they are ALWAYS > caused ONLY by the story (thoughts) I am attached to. " If you > survive the truck collision you might have a story about it. But > can you really be so sure that the painful feelings you have weren't > caused by the truck? The story begins with the " I " . And here we go, creating like god: " I am " . " I am hurt " . " I was hurt by that stupid, bloody big car they call a truck, because that damned driver wasn't paying enough attention because he was drunk! If he had not drunk that much, I would be happy! Now I am a failure, because I can not walk anymore... " and on, and on, and on. So, what is yours? Love, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2004 Report Share Posted February 10, 2004 I was thinking along similiar lines. There is a alot of emails trying to define one word instead of looking at overall concepts. But isn't this how we find out more about the work? I know I don't want to be trying to second guess what any one might take the wrong way in my emails. Which is what I tend to do sometimes. The thought that it might not be enlightening or clear enough for everyone.....Oh brother there goes another worksheet.......... Doreen Eddie Katz wrote: I think people need to lighten up about this stuff--the " Work " is not serious stuff! Eddie --------------------------------- Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2004 Report Share Posted February 10, 2004 Dear Eddie, > Good example Randy! I agree with you...sometimes your thumb hurts > because > you hit it with a hammer not because you carry around a story about a > painful thumb. It's not about not feeling your tumb when you hit it. I have been told there are people who can not feel pain by doing meditation. Don't know if that's true. Let's play with your thumb. There is your thumb. You hit it. What do you feel? Pain? What IS pain? Now try to explain it to me in a way that you can KNOW I am feeling the same as you are. Can you ever know what pain is like for me? I feel pulse in my thumb, it grows, it becomes red. What is the difference between having a thumb I hit a hammer on and having a thumb I did not hit a hammer on. Which is better? Why? > But there's always somthing " storylike " to investigate if > that's your proclivity. For example you may want to investigate the > story > about why you always hit your thumb when you use a hammer. I think > people > need to lighten up about this stuff--the " Work " is not serious stuff! > Eddie True, the work is nothing without you. It only takes you as far as you are willing to get. Where do YOU want to go? When I started with the work, I did not go very far. (Is that true?;-) But it helped me to realize that the pain did not come from outside. Now if this is true, it's a real good story. Because if I am the one inflicting pain, I can change that, can't I? The work is not about being spiritual, Eddie. Even if it looks to you that way. But then, who are we to know? Guide us! Love, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.