Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Posted December 18, 2008 The concept of an international system to codify medical diagnoses may have some merit, but come on, give me a break. That money spent on those silly code books is so insulting ... on a good day, I try to remember laughing at Chico Marx, in A Day at the Races --- " getcher code book ! ... " , then selling Groucho a second set of code books, to de-cipher the first set ... I don't know if this is the worst invention to ever get excreted into the practice of medicine, but it is certainly an enormous burden. After about 10-15 minutes of fumbling through my code books, and my on-line references, I am ready to just give up, or settle on anything close. An example: Raynaud's Phenomenon (much more common than Raynaud's Syndrome) has no code number, that I can find ... so, either label the patient with something much worse than she actually has, or back it off to something vague and meaningless, like " pain in extremity " ... Has anybody found an I.C.D.-9 code for isolated Raynaud's Phenomenon ? ... If it is the insurance industry which wants every bean counted, every variant of U.R.I. tallied, every polygonal peg rounded-off and jammed-into one of these round holes, then why do we have to do their work ? ... It drives me crazy. In 4 years of medical school, and 3 years of residency, I learned enough diagnoses (and treatments) to start practicing medicine (in 1980), but nobody told me I might need to spend hours-upon-hours, in endless search for a code number, to match every diagnosis ... Makes you wanta holler, the way the do my mind. Rian Mintek, M.D. ... deconstructing, at the end of a long day ... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.