Guest guest Posted January 20, 2006 Report Posted January 20, 2006 Dear Group, EN needs to be properly evaluated. Doctors too easily dismiss EN. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstra\ ct & list_uids=16188867 & itool=iconabstr & query_hl=2 & itool=pubmed_docsum http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstra\ ct & list_uids=16209157 & itool=iconabstr & query_hl=2 & itool=pubmed_docsum http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstra\ ct & list_uids=16134776 & itool=iconabstr & query_hl=2 & itool=pubmed_docsum These three abstracts are new to the literature. They illustrate serious disorder associated with EN. This is not to frighten anyone. It is my own belief that there is no such thing as true idiopathic EN. I feel that if you are told you are idiopathic, your trigger simply has not YET been discovered. I am actually encouraged to see these studies published. EN is telling us something is wrong. It should be thoroughly investigated. Love, Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.