Re: re INPP (was Dore)

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

I followed the schools programmw in conjuntion with a local osteopath who was

trained, we were given exercises every 4-6 weeks. He did an initial assessment

at the begininng and one at the end.

Both my children did it at the same time - my son was 6 and my daughter was 5.

It worked really well them doing the exercises together.

My daughter still had alot of retained reflexes at the end of the programme, so

I found a lady who was fully trained and who could implement a much more

detailed programme, taking her back to movements that she should have done in

the womb.

The schools programme takes about a year, the more detailed programme took about

2 years.

My son's co-ordination improved so that he has no issues now, he couldn't use a

knife & fork, but, could afterwards, his writing improved - however, to really

impact his writing he should have been taught to write again - this has never

happened unfortunately - schools don't do this sort of thing! He could get

dressed much more easily, could do up buttons and zips etc, he matured

emotionally, he gained bowel control and sorted his bladder control. He was

supposed to do vision therapy, but, at the end of the programme he was found to

have no issues with his eyes. He had tactile defensiveness - this all

disappeared together with other sensory issues. He was able to swim much better

and became a good swimmer. I could go on! We did TLP at the same time, the two

together were really profound in their effect.

For my daughter who had much more severe issues, the biggest effect was on her

eyes. Before INPP she had no independent eye movements from her head and was due

for extensive vision therapy - after the programme there were virtually no

issues with her eyes - it was just amazing watching her being able tomove her

eyes independently. Even the optometrist was impressed - he knew that it was all

down to the neck reflexes.

HTH

x

>

>

> Hi

>

> I would be interested to hear more about your experience with INPP. What

areas do you think it impacted.

>

> Thanks

>

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks . Their progress is really encouraging. I am currently halfway through training as an INPP practiioner as I think working on the reflexes has great potential and is an area that hasn't been fully explored in the field of autism.

Am I right in thinking you provide Fast forward programmes? Would you mind letting me know what you think about the respective strengths of the listening programme/johansen/fast forward etc, particularly in respect of how you might implement them, bearing in mind developmental order.

Thanks

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

In an ideal world I would do TST, INPP, TLP and or Johanssen or other sound

therapy and then Fast ForWord. Following this up with Learning Breakthrough as a

top up and continuing with TLP every year or so also as a top up.

All forms of sound therapy as far as I am aware work really well with a movement

programme - and their combined effects are enhanced.

Even more ideally I would start as young as possible with all of this, add in

the biomedical interventions and we could see amazing results for alot of

children.

x

>

>

>

>

> Thanks . Their progress is really encouraging. I am currently halfway

through training as an INPP practiioner as I think working on the reflexes has

great potential and is an area that hasn't been fully explored in the field of

autism.

>

> Am I right in thinking you provide Fast forward programmes? Would you mind

letting me know what you think about the respective strengths of the listening

programme/johansen/fast forward etc, particularly in respect of how you might

implement them, bearing in mind developmental order.

>

> Thanks

>

>

>