Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Cadbury (Chocolate) Recall Update FYI

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Guest guest
Posted

Cadbury Recall Update

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=46810

Representatives of Cadbury, the Food Standards Agency and

Herefordshire Council met today. The meeting was constructive,

focusing on action to address contamination at the Cadbury Marlbrook

plant.

Cadbury has agreed to take remedial action to address issues

identified at the plant, including comprehensive cleaning of the

production lines.

Cadbury has told the Agency it is now operating a positive release

system, with product only being released for onward distribution and

use after it has tested negative for salmonella. Cadbury will

increase its sampling and testing to levels that will provide a

higher degree of reassurance that contamination would be picked up.

Details of some elements of the Marlbrook remedial action are still

to be finalised. The FSA, local authorities and public health

agencies are continuing their investigations into the contamination

of Cadbury chocolate products with salmonella.

Salmonella can cause sickness and diarrhoea and the Agency is

advising people not to eat any of the affected products listed below.

If you have any of these products, you can return them to: Cadbury

Recall, Freepost MID20061, Birmingham B30 2QZ for a voucher. For more

details you can ring the Cadbury Schweppes helpline number on 0800

818181.

Summary of ACMSF Salmonella Contact Group's conclusions

As part of its investigation into salmonella contamination that led

to Cadbury Schweppes' recall of seven own-brand chocolate products,

the Food Standards Agency sought the views of the independent

Advisory Committee on the Microbiological Safety of Food (ACMSF).

The Salmonella Contact Group of the ACMSF met in Oxford on Friday 30

June to discuss the issue. It concluded:

`The presence of salmonella in ready-to-eat foods such as chocolate

is unacceptable at any level.

`End-product testing is not a suitable instrument for guaranteeing

the safety of the food and a robust HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical

Control Point) needs to be in place.

`In order to give assurance about the absence of salmonella or any

other pathogen in food a prohibitively large amount of product would

need to be tested. However, even this would not guarantee absence of

the micro-organism.

`Cadbury's risk assessment assumes that a threshold for infection can

be estimated from previous outbreak data on levels of micro-organisms

in chocolate. Such a threshold is not the same as the minimum

infectious dose for salmonella in chocolate; no minimum infectious

dose can be defined and infections may occur in consumers exposed to

significantly lower levels than that seen in previous outbreaks.

`Cadbury's risk assessment does not address the risk of salmonella in

chocolate in a way which the ACMSF would regard as a modern approach

to risk assessment.

`Based on the information provided, Cadbury appears to have used

methods for product testing which the committee considered would

underestimate the level and likelihood of salmonella contamination.

Sample heterogeneity including clumping of bacteria will influence

the MPN (most probable number) estimate and therefore the approach

cannot be relied upon in foods such as chocolate.

`In the ACMSF's view, using the MPN approach to assess the risk of

small levels of salmonella contamination in a product like chocolate

is unreliable.

`The committee also commented that where contaminated chocolate crumb

was used in the manufacture of products other than those recalled,

there could also be a cause for concern. However, the committee

acknowledged that it was difficult to quantify the risk.'

Background information

Cadbury Schweppes plc first told the Food Standards Agency on Monday

19 June 2006 that they had detected salmonella contamination of

products from its plant in Marlbrook, Herefordshire, in January 2006.

The Agency obtained further details from Cadbury Schweppes that led,

on Wednesday 21 June, to the Agency advising the company to recall

the affected products, which the company initiated on Friday 23 June.

Investigations have been continuing with the company and a number of

local authorities are involved. Information subsequently provided by

the company indicated that contamination of its products with

Salmonella Montevideo had been identified in April 2002, but these

products were destroyed.

Cadbury has told the Agency that they tested the `crumb'- the

ingredient that forms the basis for chocolate products - and some

samples of the crumb tested positive for salmonella.

The company then tested its chocolate products made from the crumb,

which revealed the contamination of the seven products withdrawn on

Friday 23 June.

The company has withdrawn those products where samples tested

positive and increased testing on all other products. On the basis of

the information supplied by the company to the Agency in the week

beginning Monday 19 June, the Agency believes that proportionate

action was taken by recalling the seven products.

However, the Agency and local authorities are continuing to

investigate the incident, and further action will be informed by any

emerging evidence.

The food safety requirements of EC Regulation 178/2002 require that

food shall not be placed on the market if it is considered injurious

to health or unfit for human consumption.

Details of the products recalled by Cadbury Schweppes

The Agency issued a Food Alert relating to the Cadbury Schweppes

recall on 23 June 2006 and an update on 30 June. The 23 June alert

provided details of the products being recalled. These are:

-- Cadbury Dairy Milk Turkish 250g

-- Cadbury Dairy Milk Caramel 250g

-- Cadbury Dairy Milk Mint 250g

-- Cadbury Dairy Milk 8 chunk

-- Cadbury Dairy Milk 1kg

-- Cadbury Dairy Milk Button Easter Egg 105g

-- Cadbury Freddo 10p

On 30 June the company issued some clarification about the Freddo

product. The product being recalled is the one where '10p' is printed

onto the foil that each product is wrapped in.

Some boxes have '10p' printed on the box and not on the individual

foil. These are not being recalled.

The Agency's Food Alert update of 30 June made clear that the

following Freddo products are not affected by the recall:

-- Freddo unflashed (without 10p marked on wrapping): unit number

(SKU) 11000482

-- Freddo Caramel 10p: unit number (SKU) 11000483

In addition, the Cadbury Dairy Milk Mint 250g bar, which has been

recalled, is also available, with 33% extra free, printed onto the

foil. These are also being recalled.

Food alerts

Food alerts are the FSA's way of letting local authorities and

consumers know about problems associated with food and, in some

cases, providing details of specific action to be taken. They are

issued under two categories:

-- Food Alerts: for Action

-- Food Alerts: for Information

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...