Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Posted June 27, 2001 I don't get it. Why do people put themselves through this angst? Why not just find a doctor who actually wants his customers to be healthy? Find a doctor who is not reimbursed by the HMOs according to how high his vax rate is. Why not hire a Naturopath physician as your pediatrician? What is this love affair with the MD? At any rate, if folks are deadset on having an MD, there are MDs who are not condescending and do as their customer wishes without all the " your child will die " stuff. But of course, as with anything worthwhile, it requires effort from the parent to locate such an MD. Call Mothering Magazine Ask for referrals from health food stores and direct entry midwives www.ACAM.org www.healthmall.com www.alternativemedicine.com www.healthy.net Quote
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Posted June 27, 2001 I got JoAnne's permission to forward this to the group. Would like some answers for her Dr. Rebuttal. Thanks The following is an e-mail I sent to our Pediatrician and his response. Can anyone give me some good comebacks to this. I'm so sick of his ignorance and " I'm never wrong " attitude. Dr. Bahan, Could you please read this and forward it to your assistant. I understand where you guys are coming from but to give me the cold shoulder because I care so much for my kids and am trying to do what's best for them is wrong. Until any of you have walked a mile in my shoes, you'll never understand the pain and heartache we've all been through. Since has a much higher chance of developing autism, how can I not take every measure to prevent this. She may be getting her vaccines slower than other children but at least she is getting them. I have talked to so many Pediatricians, Anesthesiologists, and other doctors who also have children with Autism. They all agree that we're giving too many vaccines to these tiny infants whose immune system isn't fully developed yet. I don't take this subject lightly and do nothing but research everything before I make my decisions. I blindly gave Hunter all his vaccines and in doing this injected him with so much mercury that if he does indeed have a defect in metallothionein proteins that we talked about, then his body had no way to eliminate it. Why is Dr. Holmes having such a high success rate? She was actually the one to tell me to go get 's Hib shot immediately and she believes she should have all of her vaccines, including the MMR (separately) but to just space them out. I beg you to both read the following because it sums it all up. * I sent the speech from Dr. Yazbak* Sincerely, JoAnne Pike Here's his reply: I appologize for anything that Trilla may have said which was offensive, and I sympathize with your pain, that is why I attempt to follow your wishes unless it is something that truly clashes with my ethical duties. Unfortunately, you continue to believe unreliable sources and completely rebute every credible bit of science. Some of your sources are well meaning but misguided by what is turning into the religion or autism and the evils of everything. Others, such as many of the labs are less than ethical in that they perform test that they know are less than credible. But let me answer some of Dr. Yazbak's auestion. By the way, he is the only pediatric infectious disease specialist I have ever heard with this view, and I know many. It is safe to say that he is in the <1%of pediatricians and subspecialist with this view. 1. 6 children per day because the california has a high birth rate. 2. everybody looks at autism seriously. Like most mental diseases it is difficult to study. 3. The fda follows the CDC, AAP, AMA ,and every other physician organization in promoting vaccinations they follow our recomendations. 4.Most vaccines take at least 10 years to approve. Lice shampoos tend to use a known toxic chemical called lidane which if absorbed can be catastrophic 5.epidemics are reported when they occur. strep pneumo has been a problem for 30 years. 6.all vaccines undergo extensive safety studies similiar to any new medication.the final stage of the rotavirus study took 4 years. 7. all medication studies are financed by the company making the drug. these studies are strictly controled by the FAA and are usually perfomed at major medical centers by the top phisicians in the field such as MUSC, DUKE, MAYO CLINIC 8.By definition, the safety studies are made to show that a vaccine does not cause any illness. 9. We only give vaccines together that we prove work equally well together. the reason is obvious...fewer injections and the children get protected sooner. 10. to prevent epidemics. By the way, there are very few if any live vaccines used anymore 11. This is the question which shows the most ignorance. The immune system gets a bigger workout sucking on the pacifier that fell on the floor than from an immunization. Immunizations trigger a natural response in the body in a natural way so that the immune system will recognize the offending agent when seen. Maybe it would be better to let the children catch pertussis and if they live they will be immune. 12.because it is much more cost effective to repeat the vaccination. in addition, many of theose 95% will lose immunity by 20 and will need a repeat anyway. That is why in about 1990 we started giving the second MMR. 13. Because we are trying to prevent children from getting life threating illnesses. 14. We don't have any new immune diseases. The numbers have been compatable for decades. 15. We have proved again and again that they don't cause Autism. How many times to we have to prove the earth is round. 16. there still is no addequate treatment for Autism. A better question is why tdon't those who proport to have the answere perform a randomized trial instead of depending on testimonial which are historically inaccurate ....remember laitril Think about these as you read . I hope all goes well with Marc --- End forwarded message --- Quote
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2001 Report Posted June 27, 2001 How about just; " Please forward my records to [insert new doctor] " S. Hjfasufi@... wrote: > I got JoAnne's permission to forward this to the group. Would like > some answers for her Dr. Rebuttal. > > Thanks > > > > The following is an e-mail I sent to our Pediatrician and his > response. Can > anyone give me some good comebacks to this. I'm so sick of his > ignorance and > " I'm never wrong " attitude. > > Dr. Bahan, > > Could you please read this and forward it to your assistant. I > understand > where you guys are coming from but to give me the cold shoulder > because I > care so much for my kids and am trying to do what's best for them is > wrong. > Until any of you have walked a mile in my shoes, you'll never > understand the > pain and heartache we've all been through. Since has a much > higher > chance of developing autism, how can I not take every measure to > prevent > this. She may be getting her vaccines slower than other children but > at least > she is getting them. I have talked to so many Pediatricians, > Anesthesiologists, and other doctors who also have children with > Autism. They > all agree that we're giving too many vaccines to these tiny infants > whose > immune system isn't fully developed yet. I don't take this subject > lightly > and do nothing but research everything before I make my decisions. I > blindly > gave Hunter all his vaccines and in doing this injected him with so > much > mercury that if he does indeed have a defect in metallothionein > proteins that > we talked about, then his body had no way to eliminate it. Why is Dr. > Holmes > having such a high success rate? She was actually the one to tell me > to go > get 's Hib shot immediately and she believes she should have > all of her > vaccines, including the MMR (separately) but to just space them out. > I beg > you to both read the following because it sums it all up. > * I sent the speech from Dr. Yazbak* > Sincerely, > JoAnne Pike > > Here's his reply: > > I appologize for anything that Trilla may have said which was > offensive, > and I sympathize with your pain, that is why I attempt to follow your > wishes > unless it is something that truly clashes with my ethical duties. > Unfortunately, you continue to believe unreliable sources and > completely > rebute every credible bit of science. Some of your sources are well > meaning > but misguided by what is turning into the religion or autism and the > evils > of everything. Others, such as many of the labs are less than > ethical in > that they perform test that they know are less than credible. But let > me > answer some of Dr. Yazbak's auestion. By the way, he is the only > pediatric > infectious disease specialist I have ever heard with this view, and I > know > many. It is safe to say that he is in the <1%of pediatricians and > subspecialist with this view. > > 1. 6 children per day because the california has a high birth rate. > > 2. everybody looks at autism seriously. Like most mental diseases > it is > difficult to study. > 3. The fda follows the CDC, AAP, AMA ,and every other physician > organization in promoting vaccinations they follow our recomendations. > > 4.Most vaccines take at least 10 years to approve. Lice shampoos > tend to > use a known toxic chemical called lidane which if absorbed can be > catastrophic > 5.epidemics are reported when they occur. strep pneumo has been a > problem > for 30 years. > 6.all vaccines undergo extensive safety studies similiar to any new > > medication.the final stage of the rotavirus study took 4 years. > 7. all medication studies are financed by the company making the > drug. > these studies are strictly controled by the FAA and are usually > perfomed at > major medical centers by the top phisicians in the field such as > MUSC, DUKE, > MAYO CLINIC > 8.By definition, the safety studies are made to show that a > vaccine does > not cause any illness. > 9. We only give vaccines together that we prove work equally well > together. the reason is obvious...fewer injections and the children > get > protected sooner. > 10. to prevent epidemics. By the way, there are very few if any live > > vaccines used anymore > 11. This is the question which shows the most ignorance. The immune > system > gets a bigger workout sucking on the pacifier that fell on the floor > than > from an immunization. Immunizations trigger a natural response in > the body > in a natural way so that the immune system will recognize the > offending > agent when seen. Maybe it would be better to let the children catch > pertussis and if they live they will be immune. > 12.because it is much more cost effective to repeat the vaccination. > in > addition, many of theose 95% will lose immunity by 20 and will need a > repeat > anyway. That is why in about 1990 we started giving the second MMR. > 13. Because we are trying to prevent children from getting life > threating > illnesses. > 14. We don't have any new immune diseases. The numbers have been > compatable > for decades. > 15. We have proved again and again that they don't cause Autism. > How many > times to we have to prove the earth is round. > 16. there still is no addequate treatment for Autism. A better > question is > why tdon't those who proport to have the answere perform a randomized > trial > instead of depending on testimonial which are historically inaccurate > ...remember laitril > > Think about these as you read . I hope all goes well with > Marc > --- End forwarded message --- > > > > Quote
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2006 Report Posted January 17, 2006 , hi " Early retirement " is not the same as being " unable to work due to.... " So, since your last doc appt. was Jan 5, start communicating with your doc by Fax. Start with requesting a letter stating something like this: " is unable to work due to the following symptoms (list them here) from progressive CMT. She is unable to work any longer because of an inability to (and list all the PHYSICAL tasks you can no longer do) " . Your doc (and you) may or may not find info to help in this site http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/greenbook/ Remember, when it comes down to SSDI, all they care about is YOU ARE UNABLE TO WORK and WHY. Sorry I cannot help with your employer issue, but I am only intuiting that being " unable to work " will fly better than " early retirement " . " Early Retirement " sort of sounds like you're going off to Jamaica to pursue your love of sailing - lol - but I think you know what I mean. ~ Gretchen Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.