Jump to content
RemedySpot.com
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Re: Odds of mold toxicity symptoms being reversible

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

,

You could be right, but than again when people move and still are sick

how do you know it's not something preexisting in the house and

mistook for contaminated items?

I won't know until I am able to build a structure that has no

cellulose to mold and try moving into it. My theory is I will improve

dramatically without the presence of active mold colonies.

Despite the presence of contaminated items.

I will share my findings with this group regardless if and when I can

achieve this goal.

Their is a good chance once I reach a new baseline in this type of

experiment and I will react to contaminated items.

But if I don't try my theory I will never know.

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:59:46 -0000, you wrote:

>Everyones tolerence, sensitivity-, amount of toxin, spores present,

>varies to a great degree-It is worth it for those newly sick and

>doing their first move to take the most extreme measures to protect

>themselves- many people have made their first move only to find they

>must move again- this time without their " stuff " .-I did this myself

>because I did not have this support group to guide me- hopefully

>people will learn from our experience

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I think people should realize that with poisons like mycotoxins, the damage

they do is I think, cumulative, and also that they store up inside of your

body, so they may continue to do damage for a long time after you leave a

moldy apt. Cumulative damage, not damage that will just magically go away,

poof. The reason you move is because you want to stop the further damage,

and in retrospect, for me it was that like any sane individual, you HOPE

against hope that it isn't permanent, but often it is..

Some cells regrow and repair themselves, some don't. Some kinds of damage

seem to propagate.. like cancer, when mycotoxins cause it, for example..

(Asp/pen cause a huge amount of cancer in this world.. thats not a subject

of debate anymore..)

Also, unless you can afford to throw ALL of your belongings out, the chances

are fairly high that there is a residual amount of mold in your stuff,

nomatter how much effort you expend in trying to get rid of it. I know this

because today I put on a fleece jacket for the first time in months that was

washed three times in detergent, bleach and later borax, and it still made

my wrists get red and smelled like mold..

Sure, they will always say, " If this is so important, why didn't you throw

it out? " but when you are UNEMPLOYED FROM THE MOLD you can't just replace

EVERYTHING YOU OWN.. either.. that would cost MUCH more money than you have

and its not very smart or prudent.. either..

In other words, you are dammed if you do and dammed if you don't...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

OK, when you move, you will continue to be sick untill you recover-

most people do not recover immediatly- my own recovery times have

varried from 15 months to 2 weeks--If you move without your stuff-

take your cholestrymine, and do not start to feel better after a

month-you have narrowed it down to maybe the house- or maybe you

just need more time-only after you definitly feel better should you

bring only one item- totally cleaned ,at a time into the house-I can

help people with the cleaning of their stuff-if things are

contaminated with toxin, and you feel the burn coming from them- do

not bring anything into your new house- Yes-after you are totally

healed you may be able to tollerate some small contaminated items-

but why delay your recovery by exposure to replacable items?

>

> ,

> You could be right, but than again when people move and still are

sick

> how do you know it's not something preexisting in the house and

> mistook for contaminated items?

> I won't know until I am able to build a structure that has no

> cellulose to mold and try moving into it. My theory is I will

improve

> dramatically without the presence of active mold colonies.

> Despite the presence of contaminated items.

> I will share my findings with this group regardless if and when I

can

> achieve this goal.

> Their is a good chance once I reach a new baseline in this type of

> experiment and I will react to contaminated items.

> But if I don't try my theory I will never know.

>

>

>

>

> >

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

For me, as far as clothes go- polartec, " fleece " was the most

impossible clothing to clean- only Vulpex 12 hr soak worked for me-

considering the time and cost-new clothes may be in order- this

spring- my girlfriends donated clothing-I was dressed very well for

someone living in a tent

--- In , LiveSimply <quackadillian@...>

wrote:

>

> I think people should realize that with poisons like mycotoxins,

the damage

> they do is I think, cumulative, and also that they store up inside

of your

> body, so they may continue to do damage for a long time after you

leave a

> moldy apt. Cumulative damage, not damage that will just magically

go away,

> poof. The reason you move is because you want to stop the further

damage,

> and in retrospect, for me it was that like any sane individual,

you HOPE

> against hope that it isn't permanent, but often it is..

>

> Some cells regrow and repair themselves, some don't. Some kinds of

damage

> seem to propagate.. like cancer, when mycotoxins cause it, for

example..

> (Asp/pen cause a huge amount of cancer in this world.. thats not a

subject

> of debate anymore..)

>

> Also, unless you can afford to throw ALL of your belongings out,

the chances

> are fairly high that there is a residual amount of mold in your

stuff,

> nomatter how much effort you expend in trying to get rid of it. I

know this

> because today I put on a fleece jacket for the first time in

months that was

> washed three times in detergent, bleach and later borax, and it

still made

> my wrists get red and smelled like mold..

>

> Sure, they will always say, " If this is so important, why didn't

you throw

> it out? " but when you are UNEMPLOYED FROM THE MOLD you can't just

replace

> EVERYTHING YOU OWN.. either.. that would cost MUCH more money than

you have

> and its not very smart or prudent.. either..

>

> In other words, you are dammed if you do and dammed if you don't...

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

You can get pretty good new clothes at Walmart or

Kmart and new all leather shoes if you aren't

adverse to shopping at Walmart due to political

reasons. Right now I can't afford to not shop at

cheapest of places. I get complements on my

clothes many times and they are all from these

discount clothes. It makes throwing them away

easy or at least easier. By all means all

leather shoes at these stores.

--- carondeen <kdeanstudios@...> wrote:

> For me, as far as clothes go- polartec, " fleece "

> was the most

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:02:08 -0000, you wrote:

> Yes-after you are totally

>healed you may be able to tollerate some small contaminated items-

>but why delay your recovery by exposure to replacable items?

>

I think the problem I have with the concept is it's too much of a

burden for an already hopelessly burdened victim.

There's no proof it's necessary. My biggest concern would be bringing

spores into an already water damaged building and reintroducing the

strains of mold that were so damaging to ones health in the first

place.

No moldie should be moving into a damp or water damaged building so

barring this their is no way spores can grow other than the air

conditioning system becoming contaminated with it. But neither of

these things happened when I contaminated my brothers house, 1.

because he had no active water problems, and 2. because without a

constant supply of spores the ac's apparently can't sustain harmful

mold species indefinably, or maybe they don't have the same propensity

to do harm in a 1500' house as they do in a 200 sq foot trailer.

I realize this may be playing with fire, clearly you don't want to

introduce fire hazards into your house there ticking time bombs.

Clearly the more spores you introduce the more the propensity for a

" fire " But by the same token I am just trying to figure out a way

that is REALISTIC to escape mold illness.

My theory is don't allow it to grow and it can't bother you.

Clearly one want's to limit cross contamination but what limits are

reasonable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

-Sorry I am not making myself clear,We are comparing apples and

oranges--I am talking about the residual toxin, that cannot be

washed away by any traditional means- many people on this site find

out too late that their stuff is contaminated with a strange

substance that cannot be cleaned and is making them sick- I am not

talking about spores- this toxin can bedevil you- make your friends

think you are crazy- and cause you to move multiple times- shave

your head- and live in the pool at the YMCA- , better safe than

sorry for the rest of your life

In , Christ <antares41_41@...>

wrote:

>

> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:02:08 -0000, you wrote:

>

> > Yes-after you are totally

> >healed you may be able to tollerate some small contaminated items-

> >but why delay your recovery by exposure to replacable items?

> >

>

> I think the problem I have with the concept is it's too much of a

> burden for an already hopelessly burdened victim.

> There's no proof it's necessary. My biggest concern would be

bringing

> spores into an already water damaged building and reintroducing the

> strains of mold that were so damaging to ones health in the first

> place.

>

> No moldie should be moving into a damp or water damaged building so

> barring this their is no way spores can grow other than the air

> conditioning system becoming contaminated with it. But neither of

> these things happened when I contaminated my brothers house, 1.

> because he had no active water problems, and 2. because without a

> constant supply of spores the ac's apparently can't sustain harmful

> mold species indefinably, or maybe they don't have the same

propensity

> to do harm in a 1500' house as they do in a 200 sq foot trailer.

>

> I realize this may be playing with fire, clearly you don't want to

> introduce fire hazards into your house there ticking time bombs.

> Clearly the more spores you introduce the more the propensity for a

> " fire " But by the same token I am just trying to figure out a way

> that is REALISTIC to escape mold illness.

>

> My theory is don't allow it to grow and it can't bother you.

>

> Clearly one want's to limit cross contamination but what limits are

> reasonable?

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

,

I am just calling into question the whole practice, not saying your

wrong. We are comparing apples and apples. I am challenging the theory

of residue mycotoxins. I don't believe you can carry enough on your

belongings to be of major concern. My thinking is the emphasis should

be on ACTIVE mold colonies. I know how sensitive we are, it's

crippled me for 10 years now. But I have always had an ACTIVE mold

colony to implicate for this and never have I observed ONLY items

contaminated with mycotoxins causing me illness. My theory is that

they dissipate and break down like most other toxins rather rapidly

and without a constant source of new ones it's a non issue. I would

think their would be no hope for us otherwise. They certainly would be

everywhere and their would be no avoiding them if they persisted for

years or even months. I know some people think I'm stupid. But if

mycotoxins are as virulent and last as long as people suggest here

that would be quit extraordinary. Anytime I hear a claim that defy's

common sense or is as extraordinary as this I just want a little more

proof. Not telling people to base their actions on my theory and if

they do, they do it at their own risk.

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:00:24 -0000, you wrote:

>-Sorry I am not making myself clear,We are comparing apples and

>oranges--I am talking about the residual toxin, that cannot be

>washed away by any traditional means- many people on this site find

>out too late that their stuff is contaminated with a strange

>substance that cannot be cleaned and is making them sick- I am not

>talking about spores- this toxin can bedevil you- make your friends

>think you are crazy- and cause you to move multiple times- shave

>your head- and live in the pool at the YMCA- , better safe than

>sorry for the rest of your life

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

As far as I know mycotoxins can last forever and they alone are what make

animals and humans sick. Thousands will fit on just the tip of a pin head!!!

When mold is disturbed or removed incorrectly those mycotoxins just float all

through a building and cling to everything. That's why they tell you to leave

everything behind. Only non porous things can be cleaned. I think some

people are more sensitive than others and can get a hit very easily. May take

more for others.

Sue

,

I am just calling into question the whole practice, not saying your

wrong. We are comparing apples and apples. I am challenging the theory

of residue mycotoxins. I don't believe you can carry enough on your

belongings to be of major concern. My thinking is the emphasis should

be on ACTIVE mold colonies. I know how sensitive we are, it's

crippled me for 10 years now. But I have always had an ACTIVE mold

colony to implicate for this and never have I observed ONLY items

contaminated with mycotoxins causing me illness. My theory is that

they dissipate and break down like most other toxins rather rapidly

and without a constant source of new ones it's a non issue. I would

think their would be no hope for us otherwise. They certainly would be

everywhere and their would be no avoiding them if they persisted for

years or even months. I know some people think I'm stupid. But if

mycotoxins are as virulent and last as long as people suggest here

that would be quit extraordinary. Anytime I hear a claim that defy's

common sense or is as extraordinary as this I just want a little more

proof. Not telling people to base their actions on my theory and if

they do, they do it at their own risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

, I think you put your finger right on why you are still sick.

You don't listen to the advice of LOTS of people with much more HARD WON

experience in these things than you who have told you what to do - but you

don't want to do it.

And then you persist in complaining about it to us anyway.

, many mycotoxins can be measured in environments. Its not easy, but

the last few years have seen a lot of progress in measuring these things and

the links to the papers have been posted here repeatedly. Just go back and

search the archives.

In particular, look at the work of the Texas Tech people..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

*1: *J Occup Environ Hyg. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'J Occup Environ

Hyg.');> 2004 Jul;1(7):442-7. Related

Articles,<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?itool=pubmed_Abstract & db\

=pubmed & cmd=Display & dopt=pubmed_pubmed & from_uid=15238314 & itool=ExternalSearch>

Links <javascript:PopUpMenu2_Set(Menu15238314);> [image: Click here to

read]<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/utils/fref.fcgi?itool=Abstract-def & PrId\

=3396 & uid=15238314 & db=pubmed & url=http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/Index/10.\

1080/15459620490462823>

*An investigation into techniques for cleaning mold-contaminated home

contents.*

*

SC*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pub\

med_Abstract & term=%22+SC%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*Brasel

TL*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pub\

med_Abstract & term=%22Brasel+TL%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*Carriker

CG*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pub\

med_Abstract & term=%22Carriker+CG%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*Fortenberry

GD*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pub\

med_Abstract & term=%22Fortenberry+GD%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*Fogle

MR*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pub\

med_Abstract & term=%22Fogle+MR%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*

JM*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pub\

med_Abstract & term=%22+JM%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*Wu

C*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubm\

ed_Abstract & term=%22Wu+C%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*Andriychuk

LA*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pub\

med_Abstract & term=%22Andriychuk+LA%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*Karunasena

E*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pubm\

ed_Abstract & term=%22Karunasena+E%22%5BAuthor%5D>,

*Straus

DC*<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed & cmd=Search & itool=pub\

med_Abstract & term=%22Straus+DC%22%5BAuthor%5D>

..

Center for Indoor Air Research, Department of Microbiology and Immunology,

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas 79430, USA.

.@...

This study examined the efficacy of the following treatments to reduce

selected fungal spore and mycotoxin levels on materials commonly found in

home contents: (1) gamma irradiation at a 10-13 kiloGray exposure, (2) a

detergent/bleach wash, and (3) a steam cleaning technique. A minimum of six

replicates were performed per treatment. Paper, cloth, wood, and carpet were

inoculated with either fungal spores (Stachybotrys chartarum, Aspergillus

niger, Penicillium chrysogenum, or Chaetomium globosum) at 240,000

spores/2.54 cm2 of material or with the mycotoxins roridin A, T-2, and

verrucarin A at 10 microg per 2.54 cm2 of material. Treatments were

evaluated with an agar plating technique for fungal spores and a yeast

toxicity culture assay for mycotoxins. Results showed that gamma irradiation

inactivated fungal spores, but the treatment was not successful in

inactivating mycotoxins. The washing technique completely inactivated or

removed spores on all materials except for C. globosum, which was reduced on

all items except paper (p < 0.05). Washing inactivated all mycotoxins on

paper and cloth but not on carpet or untreated wood (p < 0.001). The steam

cleaning treatment did not completely eliminate any fungal spores; however,

it reduced P. chrysogenum numbers on all materials, C. globosum was reduced

on wood and carpet, and S. chartarum was reduced on wood (p < 0.05). Steam

cleaning was unsuccessful in inactivating any of the tested mycotoxins.

These results show that the bleach/detergent washing technique was more

effective overall in reducing spore and mycotoxin levels than gamma

irradiation or steam cleaning. However, the other examined techniques were

successful in varying degrees. Copyright 2004 JOEH, LLC

PMID: 15238314 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Yes, you are right, the behavior of mycotoxins is extremely unusual-

and that is why it takes such vigilence to get rid of them and get

healthy-when I first got on this group, I had allready ruined one

rental property by bringing things that had only been scrubbed

numerouse times- and clothing was washed 2x before it came into the

house- only hard object were brought in- still, the clothing burned

me and the chairs and tables had to be evicted, and I had to start

over- after talking to at least 5 older moldies-I found out that

this was not a unusuall experience- and that the experience of 2

people was that after app. 5 years, the chemicals involved in the

mycotoxin contamination would oxidize enough to have them back, but

only if they are exposed to the air. Please refer to Dr Joe Klein's

Statchy web site- the man cross contaminated 4 homes-and his family

had to shave their bodies in order to live with him again . Right

now I have been talking on the phone to a woman who is equally as

sensitive, and has had to move several times, and is bedeviled by

cross contamination of mycotoxins, not spores. If you have been sick

for 10 years , maybe you need to look into the concept of complete

avoidence to help yourself get well and stay well. As far as my

research- which I spent a year doing- the concept of mycotoxin

contamination is an established fact- that these facts are backed up

by my own hard bought experience only confirms it- helping people

avoid the negative things that I did, not once, but three times,is

the only thing I can offer.

>

> >-Sorry I am not making myself clear,We are comparing apples and

> >oranges--I am talking about the residual toxin, that cannot be

> >washed away by any traditional means- many people on this site

find

> >out too late that their stuff is contaminated with a strange

> >substance that cannot be cleaned and is making them sick- I am

not

> >talking about spores- this toxin can bedevil you- make your

friends

> >think you are crazy- and cause you to move multiple times- shave

> >your head- and live in the pool at the YMCA- , better safe than

> >sorry for the rest of your life

> >

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

My observations are the opposite of yours but have always been clouded

by the presence of actual living breathing mold colonies. I admit my

observations to be what is known as anodotal. Never been tested and

verified by a group of peers. Until this happens I will be the first

to say although I challange your view I am not saying your wrong.

robert

> If you have been sick

>for 10 years , maybe you need to look into the concept of complete

>avoidence to help yourself get well and stay well. As far as my

>research- which I spent a year doing- the concept of mycotoxin

>contamination is an established fact- that these facts are backed up

>by my own hard bought experience only confirms it- helping people

>avoid the negative things that I did, not once, but three times,is

>the only thing I can offer.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I think that removing mycotoxins from our bodies is much easier than

removing, say lead or mercury from our brains.. (it doesn't happen..)

However, from what I've read, some kinds of damage they do can't be undone..

damage to DNA, and damage to brain, kidneys, liver, eyes, etc.

You may possibly be able to practice mold avoidance and take tons of

supplements and perhaps do things like HBOT, etc. get your MSH, etc. back up

and regain your physical energy level.. but you still have that abnormal

hypersensitivity to chemicals and you still have whatever brain or organ

damage you received and the mutated pieces of DNA all over your body that

could eventually cause cancer.. and other things, probably..

This might change..someday.. The thing that everyone is looking at is stem

cell therapy, because human stem cells are the progenitors of your organs

when you are growing as an embryo and they could conceivably be used in an

adult to grow new cells in the damaged organs that could regenerate the

damaged functionality..

If this kind of therapy is never available to us, it might be available to

some future generations through gene splicing, sort of like how they created

the hypoallergenic cats..

For example, a woman at the Wistar Institute has developed a strain of mice

that can literally regrow amputated limbs, repair their hearts, etc.

But the damaged organs have to be removed first for the regeneration to

occur, so this could not be used to repair brains!

Nonetheless, from a scientific standpoint, it is really exciting!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 18:20:38 -0500, you wrote:

>, I think you put your finger right on why you are still sick.

>

I am still sick becuase I keep finding places that have active mold to

live in. Once I find a place that I can confirm as not having any

active mold and continue to be sick becauese of bedding, clothing,

computers, books, tv's etc. I will come back here and share my

experience with this group and be the first to admit I was wrong.

>You don't listen to the advice of LOTS of people with much more HARD WON

>experience in these things than you who have told you what to do - but you

>don't want to do it.

I have made many mistakes in what I percieved to be the cause of my

illness over the years. Becuase of the wholesale expousure to

pesticides I wanted to make the mcs model work and many times

misinturpreted what mechanisms were at work when I expirenced a " hit "

for being chemicals. I now know that to be wrong. At one time there

were many people inditing chemicals for their wild swings. They were

wrong, many are now mold converts. I can only assume that many people

here MIGHT have made the same types of mistakes possibley with

mycotoxins and spores.

This is why it's so important not to assume peoples anodotal accounts

as fact. What if I were to never have converted from MCS to SBS or

mold as being the cuase becuase I listend to equally persuasive people

that it was scented products and the likes. This is why in the

scientific comunity we call these accounts anodotal.

>tions.

>, many mycotoxins can be measured in environments. Its not easy, but

>the last few years have seen a lot of progress in measuring these things and

>the links to the papers have been posted here repeatedly. Just go back and

>search the archives.

>

>In particular, look at the work of the Texas Tech people..

Being I am a slow reader I havn't been able to pour over the mountains

of information on the internet. I have briefly visited the texas tech

people. They seemed to be more into testing than anything else from

what I remember. The actual identification of a substence does not

indicate it's effect on humans. That's what I am interested in. I

would be very happy to read any information on that site that pertains

to this subject or indeed supports your position though. Especially

any work that is peer reviewed, or considered to be fact and not

speculatiion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I'm wondering if whether the toxicity is reversible isn't highly dependent upon

one's genotype? I and both my sons have the mold gentoype. And, my younger son

and I both have the multisusceptible/dreaded genotype - we are far sicker and

far, far more sensitive than my older son, whose other gene is low MSH. My

older son also recovered quickly on the CSM, while my younger son and I are

still struggling. There's no doubt that my older son would get ill in a

building with active mold colonies, but I stongly suspect that he's not going to

have the issues with contamination that I'm certain my younger son and I will.

I don't have my own anecdotal data, since we've not yet made our (first) move.

However, my younger son is much like me in terms of reacting to everything

(chemicals, food, etc.), while the older son isn't too bothered. This has been

confirmed by our NAET doctor, as well - older son is surprisingly healthy - only

about 8 things seem to bother him at all.

I'm just curious how closely my experiences model those of others who know their

gentotypes?

B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

, what is a NAET Dr.?

I'm wondering if whether the toxicity is reversible isn't highly dependent

upon one's genotype? I and both my sons have the mold gentoype. And, my

younger son and I both have the multisusceptible/I'm wondering if whether the

toxicity is reversible isn't highly dependent upon one's genotype? I and both

my

sons have the mold gentoype. And, my younger son and I both have the

multisusceptible/<WBR>dreaded genotype - we are far sicker and far, far more

sensitive than my older son, whose other gene is low MSH. My older son also

recovered

quickly on the CSM, while my younger son and I are still struggling. There's

no doubt that my older son would get ill in a building with active mold

colonies, but I stongly suspect that he's not going to have the issues with

contamination that I'm certain my younger son and I will. I don't have my own

anecdotal data, since we've not yet made our (first) move. However, my younger

son is much like me in terms of reacting to everything (

I'm just curious how closely my experiences model those of others who know

their gentotypes?

B.

ry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

> , what is a NAET Dr.?

NAET is Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Technique. It's a way of reprogramming

your body to not react to substances:

http://www.naet.com/subscribers/index.html (Click on the tab on the left -

About NAET and there's a " What is NAET? " choice).

It has helped me alot in dealing with my reactions to mold, knowing when I am

reacting and allowing me to take CSM. I've also been treated for reactions to

things as basic as calcium and B vitamins, along with a reaction to my own blood

and hormones.

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

>

>

> I'm wondering if whether the toxicity is reversible isn't highly

dependent

> upon one's genotype? I and both my sons have the mold gentoype.

And, my

> younger son and I both have the multisusceptible/I'm wondering if

whether the

>

I don't have an answer to this queston (wish I did) I've also

wondered about the significance of the genotype. For instance, I

have the multisusceptible one and the lyme one, but not the mold

one; I don't show exposure to lyme.

What exactly does the multisusceptible genotype mean? Since I don't

have the mold one, does that mean I have a better chance of

recovering or does having the multisusceptible one mean that I am

susceptible to all of the above?

Kathyw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

> What exactly does the multisusceptible genotype mean? Since I don't

> have the mold one, does that mean I have a better chance of

> recovering or does having the multisusceptible one mean that I am

> susceptible to all of the above?

Multiple susceptible means that any of the neurotoxins (mold, Lyme, pfisteria,

etc.) will impact you. My understanding is that for folks that also have the

mold genotype, the reaction to mold is even worse.

B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

>

> Cross contamination EXISTS!! I left my Stachybotrys mold

home in June and I still can't escape the mycotoxins. ( I've been

deathly ill for a year now). I have contaminated new apartments by

bringing in objects as small as a purse or pair of sunglasses from my

old mold home. And believe me, I am still fighting pneumonia,

bronchitis, bleeding lungs & mold growing in my sinuses. I am a

severe case because of my altered immune system, but it is Dumb to

bring any belonging from your sick building or home with you to the

new space or you will continue to be ill and spread the mycotoxins

around. They never die-- nothing kills them! Not fire or acid.

They do dissipate but it takes years. They are powerfully strong

evil little buggers! If you have any belongings from your mold home

that you want to save, put them in a storage unit that can get air to

it. A few years later you should be able to get your stuff back out

without noticing the mycotoxins on them. For now, ditch your old

home, clothes, cars, belongings ( I mean EVERYTHING!) and start all

over. It is extremely hard to do but living is better than dying!

>

>

>

>

>

> As far as I know mycotoxins can last forever and they alone are

what make

> animals and humans sick. Thousands will fit on just the tip of a

pin head!!!

> When mold is disturbed or removed incorrectly those mycotoxins

just float all

> through a building and cling to everything. That's why they tell

you to leave

> everything behind. Only non porous things can be cleaned. I think

some

> people are more sensitive than others and can get a hit very

easily. May take

> more for others.

> Sue

> ,

> I am just calling into question the whole practice, not saying your

> wrong. We are comparing apples and apples. I am challenging the

theory

> of residue mycotoxins. I don't believe you can carry enough on your

> belongings to be of major concern. My thinking is the emphasis

should

> be on ACTIVE mold colonies. I know how sensitive we are, it's

> crippled me for 10 years now. But I have always had an ACTIVE mold

> colony to implicate for this and never have I observed ONLY items

> contaminated with mycotoxins causing me illness. My theory is that

> they dissipate and break down like most other toxins rather rapidly

> and without a constant source of new ones it's a non issue. I would

> think their would be no hope for us otherwise. They certainly

would be

> everywhere and their would be no avoiding them if they persisted

for

> years or even months. I know some people think I'm stupid. But if

> mycotoxins are as virulent and last as long as people suggest here

> that would be quit extraordinary. Anytime I hear a claim that

defy's

> common sense or is as extraordinary as this I just want a little

more

> proof. Not telling people to base their actions on my theory and if

> they do, they do it at their own risk.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

--- In , LiveSimply <quackadillian@...>

wrote:

>

> , I think you put your finger right on why you are still sick.

>

> You don't listen to the advice of LOTS of people with much more

HARD WON

> experience in these things than you who have told you what to do -

but you

> don't want to do it.

>

> And then you persist in complaining about it to us anyway.

>

> , many mycotoxins can be measured in environments. Its not

easy, but

> the last few years have seen a lot of progress in measuring these

things and

> the links to the papers have been posted here repeatedly. Just go

back and

> search the archives.

>

> In particular, look at the work of the Texas Tech people..

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

I'm going to give you five stars on this one LOL. Better safe than sorry, I have

to say that to myself over and over. I look at my beautiful, best and favorite

car I have ever owned, my sporty lusted over little Dodge Stealth sitting in the

driveway covered every day and tell myself that everyday. i cannot even open the

door and look at it, I can't bring myself to part with it but I know I will

never drive it again. But all is in vein if I don't know what is truth.

Chris...

moldshan <moldshan@...> wrote:

>

> Cross contamination EXISTS!! I left my Stachybotrys mold

home in June and I still can't escape the mycotoxins. ( I've been

deathly ill for a year now). I have contaminated new apartments by

bringing in objects as small as a purse or pair of sunglasses from my

old mold home. And believe me, I am still fighting pneumonia,

bronchitis, bleeding lungs & mold growing in my sinuses. I am a

severe case because of my altered immune system, but it is Dumb to

bring any belonging from your sick building or home with you to the

new space or you will continue to be ill and spread the mycotoxins

around. They never die-- nothing kills them! Not fire or acid.

They do dissipate but it takes years. They are powerfully strong

evil little buggers! If you have any belongings from your mold home

that you want to save, put them in a storage unit that can get air to

it. A few years later you should be able to get your stuff back out

without noticing the mycotoxins on them. For now, ditch your old

home, clothes, cars, belongings ( I mean EVERYTHING!) and start all

over. It is extremely hard to do but living is better than dying!

>

>

>

>

>

> As far as I know mycotoxins can last forever and they alone are

what make

> animals and humans sick. Thousands will fit on just the tip of a

pin head!!!

> When mold is disturbed or removed incorrectly those mycotoxins

just float all

> through a building and cling to everything. That's why they tell

you to leave

> everything behind. Only non porous things can be cleaned. I think

some

> people are more sensitive than others and can get a hit very

easily. May take

> more for others.

> Sue

> ,

> I am just calling into question the whole practice, not saying your

> wrong. We are comparing apples and apples. I am challenging the

theory

> of residue mycotoxins. I don't believe you can carry enough on your

> belongings to be of major concern. My thinking is the emphasis

should

> be on ACTIVE mold colonies. I know how sensitive we are, it's

> crippled me for 10 years now. But I have always had an ACTIVE mold

> colony to implicate for this and never have I observed ONLY items

> contaminated with mycotoxins causing me illness. My theory is that

> they dissipate and break down like most other toxins rather rapidly

> and without a constant source of new ones it's a non issue. I would

> think their would be no hope for us otherwise. They certainly

would be

> everywhere and their would be no avoiding them if they persisted

for

> years or even months. I know some people think I'm stupid. But if

> mycotoxins are as virulent and last as long as people suggest here

> that would be quit extraordinary. Anytime I hear a claim that

defy's

> common sense or is as extraordinary as this I just want a little

more

> proof. Not telling people to base their actions on my theory and if

> they do, they do it at their own risk.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...