Re: 9/20 Significant Appellate Ruling, Toxicoses Proof of Cau...

[Guest guest]

My post did not go through yesterday so I am resending this.

In a message dated 9/25/2006 2:11:11 PM Central Standard Time, Bobbinsbiomed

writes:

This is indeed good news. The methodical testing measures through acceptable

and standardized medical values reflecting the objective data that backs up

the subjective complaints by patients with mold exposure is essential.

The continued documentation of this by Dr. Shoemaker and now other

physicians utilizing these same standards will continue to remain on record to

dispel

the false and misleading information put out by the defense.

Bobbins, RN, L.Ac, QME

In a message dated 9/25/2006 12:09:56 PM Central Standard Time,

snk1955@... writes:

Dear Friends,

Please pass this information on to those who could benefit from the

information. Appellate decision regarding proof of causation of

mycotoxicoses.

Wonderful Judgment. Just out. Headnote says it all.

HEADNOTE

MONTGOMERY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOSEPHINE CHESSON ET AL.,

" TRIAL COURT DID NOT ERR OR ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN CONCLUDING THAT THE

METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED BY APPELLEES’ EXPERT WITNESS, DR. SHOEMAKER, IN HIS

DETERMINATION REGARDING CAUSATION DUE TO EXPOSURE TO MOLD WERE NOT NEW OR

NOVEL

SCIENTIFIC TECHNIQUES REQUIRING APPLICATION OF THE FRYEREED TEST. "

NO. 1270, SEPTEMBER TERM, 2005

FRYE v. UNITED STATES, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. CIR., 1923);REED v. STATE, 283

MD. 374 (1978); CSX TRANSP., INC. v.MILLER, 159 MD. APP. 123 (2004), CERT.

GRANTED, 384 MD.581 (2005), CERT. DISMISSED, 387 MD. 351 (2005);

If you want a copy of the actually ruling, send an email to

__snk1955aol (DOT) _sn_ (mailto:_snk1955@...) _ (mailto:_snk1955@..._

(mailto:snk1955@...) )

Sharon Kramer