Guest guest Posted September 1, 2006 Report Posted September 1, 2006 Court backs State Farm in mold ruling 12:23 PM CDT on Friday, September 1, 2006 Associated Press http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/090 206dntexstatefarm.5898c259.html AUSTIN - The Texas Supreme Court has ruled in a case involving State Farm that standard homeowner policies used to recover damages from mold didn't cover mold. In a 7-2 decision announced Thursday, the court sided with State Farm, which said a policy bought by a Deer Park family excluded mold coverage. The ruling could affect more than 250 similar cases against State Farm and other claims filed against other insurers before July 2002, when companies had to use standard policies written by the Texas Department of Insurance. A spokeswoman for State Farm said the company believed its policies didn't cover mold caused by things such as broken pipes but paid some claims anyway while reserving the right to contest the cases. Sophie Harbert said State Farm told policyholders that it was uncertain whether mold was covered. , a lawyer for the Deer Park family that filed the claim, and Fiess, said he was considering asking for a rehearing. He questioned why the insurers paid out mold claims if they didn't think they were covered by homeowner policies. The family found black mold behind drywall that had been damaged by flooding, but they said much of the mold grew from leaks in the plumbing, roof and house before the storm. State Farm paid $34,425, but the Fiesses sued for additional compensation. The family said language in the policy excluding coverage for mold should be ignored because another clause stated that loss from water damage was covered. Writing for the court majority, Justice Brister said the wording of the mold exclusion was clear, no matter what other parts of the policy said. Dissenting justices Medina and Harriet O'Neill said the policy was ambiguous and should be interpreted in the homeowner's favor. Winslow, executive director of Texas Watch, a consumer-advocacy group, said the court went out of its way to protect insurance companies. He said homeowners are paying too much for insurance. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.