Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 From what I understand Dr. Lipsey charges close to 1,000 if not more. Most can't afford this is our situation. I respect Dr. Lipsey but most people without a lawyer can not afford him. > > I've been reading the posts on the Home Depot mold testing. Just my opinion, but I would not recommend it if you want accuracy and need it for proof of your exposure, especially if you are headed to litigation. > > I highly recommend Dr. Lipsey and have used him myself. If " do-it-yourself " testing really works, why did Dr. Lipsey spend 11 years in college to get the degree which qualifies him as an expert? Any attorney I know would laugh if I wanted to prove I had mold and DID NOT have a expert's report to back my claim. > > Again it's just my opinion, but if you think you have mold you really do need an expert to come out and examine it and take cultures. You need to know the specific types of species and the count. You may find that you have mold, but actually have a higher count outside than you do in your home. Mold is everywhere. All the the factors need to be examined and asssessed. > > Armstrong - President Florida Chapter > HomeOwners for Better Building (HOBB) > www.hobb.org > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 I agree, but not everyone needs testing for the reasons you describe. I just wanted to get an idea of IF I had mold, and what type it was. There is no need for me to go to litigatoin because my landlords are being cooperative and letting me transfer my lease. You can learn something from the tests, and since it's relatively inexpensive I think it can be an acceptable way to start. I didn't even send the last few culture plates in for testing, because to me I found out what I needed from them. There is nowhere in my apartment that we have visible mold, and the air analysis and environmental testing services I called in my area were 2500 and up. I think the culture plates are just a starting point and for some they can give some answers. I am still awaiting the results of the culture plate I did send in, because that one was highly suspect. It was a plate held up for ten minutes to my air conditioner. The mold was all the same, was black colored and grew very quickly, within less than 24 hours. For the other culture plates I did, we did one outside, one in the new apartment and one in the old all simultaneously. They took longer to grow, and when they did the outside plate had about three times as much as the others, and they all had a few different types of mold on them, none of which were black. None that only black mold is dangerous, but they seemed to mimic more natural air than an actual mold problem, and since the outdoor one was much worse, we didn't not send them out for testing. Sure I'm not a scientist but since we can't see any mold anywhere this seems to make sense to me. If we could afford the environmental testing I might do it but we simply can't. Certainly if one needed proof for litigation the Home Depot tests will not do. But we are lucky that our landlords are responsive and cooperative. They could not find any mold here, neither could we (except as I stated in our own air conditioner possibly) but they are letting us move anyway. Lori Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2006 Report Share Posted September 18, 2006 Hi , This is an ongoing issue, dispute over using these plates. Not every post is read so I will repeat, I use them since I am only interested in a count of mold to see how moldy house is to check progress in remediation. I am not going to court. I'm not looking to sue anyone or get lay any blame on anyone. Some people, like myself, are just cleaning up their own homes. In this case, house has been in the family since it was new in 1946, so noone to sue. It has held up well but problems develope over that many years. I'd have to literally DIG UP a relative to sue them. Also I DID have professional testing that backed up the results I got from Home Depot, not exact count or exact type, even professional testing from one day to the next would be different, but professional testing backed up general condition of house and location of areas that needed remediation. There was no difference in the 'big picture' of condition of home but huge difference in the cost. It depends on if you are going to court or not. That's about the only difference I can find, or if you are looking for 'toxins'. I haven't any experience with testing materials in home for toxins (yet). Just because something is inexpensive, doesn't mean it is unreliable. --- Armstrong <hobbflorida@...> wrote: > I've been reading the posts on the Home Depot > mold testing. Just my opinion, but I would not > recommend it if you want accuracy and need it > for proof of your exposure, especially if you > are headed to litigation. > > I highly recommend Dr. Lipsey and have > used him myself. If " do-it-yourself " testing > really works, why did Dr. Lipsey spend 11 years > in college to get the degree which qualifies > him as an expert? Any attorney I know would > laugh if I wanted to prove I had mold and DID > NOT have a expert's report to back my claim. > > Again it's just my opinion, but if you think > you have mold you really do need an expert to > come out and examine it and take cultures. You > need to know the specific types of species and > the count. You may find that you have mold, > but actually have a higher count outside than > you do in your home. Mold is everywhere. All > the the factors need to be examined and > asssessed. > > Armstrong - President Florida Chapter > HomeOwners for Better Building (HOBB) > www.hobb.org > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.