Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 An old Chandler Burr article;'Meow Mix' ... interesting, fact-filled, and hysterically funny. http://www.chandler burr.com/ articles/ 21chanel. html So fellow NP-ers... would you do what the old Graissoise perfumer used to do? How far are you / we prepared to go in our evaluation of fragrant substances? Margi That was great. I was full of snickers. But it's suprising, well, maybe not so suprising as it is pathetic, that mainstream " perfume " people are so ignorant of things. To almost any NPer with a little reading and a bit of experience under their belt, that stuff is old hat. Yeesh, that guy put civit paste in his mouth!?! Whoah! And I also disagree about rose absolute. I don't think its dank and musty at all, not whatsoever. Maybe some other naturals, but not rose! I totally agree about the odor of black currant buds though! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 > How far are you / we prepared to go in our evaluation of fragrant > substances? > > Margi Uh... NOPE, not to this stuff... A friend gave me some synth civet, it smells just like Grandma Kiler's Perfume. Musta been one of these Chanel No 5 or something... And pop Hyraceum in my mouth, Nope again, Petrified poop in my mouth, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 margi.macdonald wrote: > An old Chandler Burr article;'Meow Mix' ... interesting, fact-filled, > and hysterically funny. > > http://www.chandlerburr.com/articles/21chanel.html > > So fellow NP-ers... would you do what the old Graissoise perfumer used > to do? > Of course not. BTW, the more Burr reveals the poor education and experience of the commercial perfumers, it's more of a time to pat ourselves on the back for all the self-educating we do! > > How far are you / we prepared to go in our evaluation of fragrant > substances? > > Margi > That's too much of an open-ended question. -- Anya's Garden Perfumes Glorious and Rare Organic White Rose Hydrosol http://anyasagarden.com/store.htm Online perfume course starts March 6, 2009 http://anyasgarden.com/classes.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Shea wrote: > That was great. I was full of snickers. But it's suprising, well, maybe not so suprising as it is pathetic, that mainstream " perfume " people are so ignorant of things. To almost any NPer with a little reading and a bit of experience under their belt, that stuff is old hat. > , I basically said the same thing in my post. They're clueless. Hand them an aromachemical and they rhapsodize, but a natural ingredient, and by that I mean even jasmine, and they're at a loss. > And I also disagree about rose absolute. I don't think its dank and musty at all, not whatsoever. Maybe some other naturals, but not rose! I totally agree about the odor of black currant buds though! > > A lot of the bad rap about rose comes from Turin and Burr, who are woefully inadequate in evaluating naturals. They don't even know about dilution evals. -- Anya's Garden Perfumes Glorious and Rare Organic White Rose Hydrosol http://anyasagarden.com/store.htm Online perfume course starts March 6, 2009 http://anyasgarden.com/classes.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 > That's too much of an open-ended question. > Hi Anya and anyone pondering how to reply to such an open-ender... am currently in mental-holiday mode with my kids, therefore no structure... it is making my mind wander to wild and untraversed places right now, the mischief-loving part of me hopes that the Frenchman conducting that little session Mr Burr described, was so aghast to be in a room of 'experts' who knew nothing of civet, that he made up the tasting-civet-and-then-going-home-to-kiss-the-wife scenario, just to shake them out of their ignorance. Still, am wondering how far I'd go... what botanical biomass would I -tentatively- chomp and taste? MANY Which eoil, absolutes etc would I be prepared to use undiluted on my skin? ALL OF THEM Would I go to a 'civet farm', observe the collection of the civet cream, and rub a little directly into my skin? SURE THING Whom else is wondering who and when it was discerned that baby poop is / was used as an adulterant in civet? Which brings us back to something Ambrosia mentioned recently - only deal with trusted, trustworthy suppliers, and understand and know your materials intimately. Over-and-out Margi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 <, I basically said the same thing in my post. They're clueless. Hand them an aromachemical and they rhapsodize, but a natural ingredient, and by that I mean even jasmine, and they're at a loss.> You would think, as people into perfume and scent in general, that they would at least be somewhat familiar with something as basic as jasmine, or if they are really into scent, investigate a perfume ingredient classic, albeit a rare one, like civit, if not to use in their perfumes, at least to just have a well-rounded education in scent and classic perfume ingredients. It boggles my mind. And these are the movers and shakers of the perfume world? <A lot of the bad rap about rose comes from Turin and Burr, who are woefully inadequate in evaluating naturals. They don't even know about dilution evals.> Well, when it comes to rose absolute, I like it even straight out of the bottle! Of course it tends to " blossom' better when its wafting around in the air, or worn, but its still nice straight. Now rose otto is another story. I didn't like it straight out of the sample vial I got, but when I dabbed a bit on paper and let it sit a bit, wow! In fact I was using rose abs tonight( I just cant afford the otto right now-boo hoo), Valentines day is coming up and I'm doing some blends with that in mind. I think I created a really sexy blend, that I intended originally for soap, but I think I like it so much, and I think its a bit too luxurious for that purpose, that I think I will make it into a perfume. It didn't have rose in it though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 > <Of course not. BTW, the more Burr reveals the poor education and experience of the commercial perfumers, it's more of a time to pat ourselves on the back for all the self-educating we do!> Amen!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 > right now, the mischief-loving part of me hopes that the Frenchman > conducting that little session Mr Burr described, was so aghast to be > in a room of 'experts' who knew nothing of civet, that he made up the > tasting-civet-and-then-going-home-to-kiss-the-wife scenario, just to > shake them out of their ignorance. The tasting of Civet is true, and baby poop is the major additive to extend the product, if only by 10%, then greed sets in, and it becomes very discernible. Remember where the baby 'poop' comes from. The mother naturally breast feed the child (in that part of the world), and the 'poop' is very sweet from the mother's milk, light in color and lacks the typical western baby feces odor or gastric irritation that our babies incur, hence it blend in with the Civet.. BUT, and herein is the 'but', this 'baby poop' has a peculiar taste, acid, but the Civet is creamy/waxy. BTW, you do not swirl it in you mouth! Just a little taste with the tip of your tongue, or on the side... then rinse! Remember that these 'naturals' (baby poop, et al.) are multicomponent mixtures, hence difficult to analyse on GC/MS. Sure, it could be done, but at what cost, when the 'human' organoleptic sensors are far superior for a quick analysis. Remember, the end result is 'odor', the GC/MS does not smell. You could have a perfect analysis, and the product could still be adulterated or not smell correctly. -= CB =- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.