Guest guest Posted August 27, 2006 Report Share Posted August 27, 2006 Does this sound familiar? The same heel dragging is going on with those effected by mold exposure: the majority of doctors don't know how to recognize, diagnose and care for patients exposed to mold. Mulvey son THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING (http://www.boston.com/news/globe/) 9/11-responders' health woes reach beyond NYC Critics decry delay in release of federal guidelines on care By Devlin Barrett, Associated Press | August 26, 2006 NEW YORK -- The lung problems of ground zero worker Jimmy Willis got so bad that he finally left New York, hoping the dry air of Nevada would blow away the after-effects of toxic World Trade Center dust. But when he moved two years ago, Willis also left behind New York-based medical expertise on Sept. 11-related illnesses, joining a diaspora of hundreds of ground zero rescue workers scattered throughout the United States. It is a population many health specialists, union leaders, and politicians say is vulnerable to poor medical treatment because the government delayed the release of guidelines that would help doctors nationwide diagnose and treat illnesses linked to the attacks. A standard medical protocol for healthcare workers is one element of what a growing chorus of advocates says should be a long-term, national program to test and treat sick workers. Five years after the attacks, Willis, 51, has respiratory disease and gastro intestinal bleeding. ``I've been in and out of the hospital since I've been here, " said Willis, a former transit worker and onetime union official now living in Las Vegas. ``But they weren't coming back with any answers, and I almost bled to death. " The creation of testing guidelines, or protocols, was shelved for years. Most recently, officials indicated a release by the end of this year. The lag has been criticized by workers' advocates. ``It is outrageous that we don't have protocols five years out, and the consequences have been unfortunate for many workers, when their doctors across the country aren't trained to recognize specific symptoms, " said Shufro of the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health, a union group. The New York City Department of Health is crafting the protocols, but there is no set deadline for their release. At the same time, the federal government is promising a website to serve as a clearinghouse for Sept. 11 health information for people nationwide. ``We're working on it as quickly as we can. We want to make sure it's done right, and in a way that will provide a service to the responders, " said Fred Blosser, a spokesman for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The exact number of rescue workers who responded to the attacks is unknown, although estimates are more than 40,000. In New York, the focal point of research on Sept. 11-related illnesses has been Mount Sinai Medical Center; thousands have sought treatment there. Mount Sinai is expected to release its most significant findings on sick workers days before the fifth anniversary of the attacks . Beyond the city, there is a nationwide network of health clinics that offers medical screening to Sept. 11 workers. The program, run by the Association of Environmental and Occupational Health Clinics, has seen 664 patients, including 121 in the last year. Its clinics in 33 states offer a battery of tests for those worried that ground zero made them sick. Testing guidelines are crucial, however, to helping a doctor in any clinic or network recognize symptoms, said Kathy Kirkland, the association's executive director. She said standardized protocols can help alert healthcare workers to the less obvious ailments connected to ground zero work. Take the gastro intestinal problems afflicting Willis. ``That's fairly common among World Trade Center responders, but it's something a lot of clinicians wouldn't recognize, wouldn't know, " she said. Or the lungs. A standard pulmonary test doesn't show the extent of Sept. 11-related damage because although it can measure lung capacity, it doesn't gauge the wear-and-tear inflicted on the organs, she said. ``A lot of guys on the surface seem to have normal lung function, but compared to what they had before, their lungs have aged a whole lot faster than they should have, " Kirkland said. ``Again, that's not something the average clinician would think to check. " The out-of-state rescue teams that responded have some advantages: On balance, they stayed on the smoking pit for fewer days, and many arrived with respiratory gear. Still, concerns linger . ``We still talk about it when someone gets sick, " said firefighter Terry Trepanier, who returned to Ohio with ``World Trade Center cough " and failed his first lung test . ``In the back of our minds, we wonder if this is something from the World Trade Center, or is it just something else. " © _Copyright_ (http://www.boston.com/help/bostoncom_info/copyright) 2006 The New York Times Company Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2006 Report Share Posted August 28, 2006 I know that some people will probably get mad at me for bringing this up but there is a very scary aspect to this situation.. The federal government suspended normal workplace safety rules after 9-11 and so, like it or not, many people had no choice but to work in these toxic environments - often without protection - or lose their jobs, pensions, etc. And when Bush declared that we were 'at war' he also opened up a huge opportunity for health, life, and really, all insurance companies to deny coverage of the direct effects of that 'act of war' - as all health, property, life insurance policies exclude coverage for things that happen as a result of terrorism, rioting, civil unrest or 'acts of war'. (read the fine print, its there..) I think that health insurance companies are not refusing to cover 9-11 victims injuries, but that is out of the 'kindness of their hearts'.. (I think they see the negative publicity it would generate) and this probably would not have happened if a larger number of people had been killed or injured.. as in a real war on US soil.. or a larger act of terrorism.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.