Re: Re: CAN LOW LEVEL EXPOSURE TO OCHRATOXIN-A CAUSE PARKINSONISM

[Guest guest]

This article is written as if its a new concept in the world of

neuroscience that these things are additive and that they often show

up years or even decades later in life . I think that there was a

certain scientist (I forget his name) who first advocated this

viewpoint a few years ago and it has become associated with his name..

From what I have read, it seems to be a mainstream viewpoint now.

So, applying this concept to mold-initiated illness and brain cell

death, someone might get very sick from mold illness, with underlying

brain injury, at say age 40, and then appear to make a partial

recovery during the years 45-50, and then start to become senile at

age 55 instead of the 75 or 80 that they might otherwise.. But because

of the statute of limitations, and also because they had made a

partial recovery while they still had some of the energy that youth

brings, the lawyers and the legal system would probably be successful

in preventing their ever recovering any kind of compensation or them

ever being able to argue successfully that the two events were

connected.

Even if the neuroscience community was increasingly acknowledging that

the connection was there.

One could even argue that its increasingly obvious that since we don't

have universal medical care, we need a way of compensating people for

toxic insults that had a substantial probability of hurting them in

later life, before they actually became prematurely senile and could

not present the facts of the case themselves because of that, so that

at least these (injured by others) senile people could live out their

dotage in some kind of comfort instead of on a Skid Row somewhere.