Guest guest Posted January 4, 2007 Report Share Posted January 4, 2007 Thank you for posting this. -- In Autism Treatment , " nm44714 " wrote: > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/there-is-no-autism- > epidem_b_37647.html > > > > There is No Autism Epidemic > Kirby. > > It's been nearly two years since the release of my book, " Evidence > of Harm, Mercury in Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic - A Medical > Controversy, " and I continue to be vilified by critics who insist > that mercury does not cause autism, that autism is a stable genetic > condition, and that it cannot be an " epidemic. " > > I am going to declare a New Year's truce, and announce that my > critics are 100 percent correct. > > This year, I hope we can ALL agree on one thing: There is no autism > epidemic. > > Among my most spirited and articulate detractors is a group of > adults with autism who belong to a movement that refers to itself as > the " neurodiversity " community. > > These adults argue passionately that autism is neither a disease nor > a disorder, but rather a natural and special variation of the chance > genetic imprint left upon human behavior. Most of them, I believe, > have what science calls " Asperger's Syndrome, " or very high > functioning > autism. > > From their eloquent and well reasoned point of view, autism has > no " cause, " and it certainly requires no " cure. " To suggest > otherwise is to brand these adults with the stigma of disease and > disability, which is patently absurd given their educational and > intellectual achievements. > > It's like saying that left-handers or gays are deviant and need > treatment - something that reasonable people stopped doing years > ago. > So maybe autism really is just an odd genetic peculiarity that > yields atypical people whose own set of talents and gifts can lead > to perfectly happy and fulfilled lives, with little or no dependence > on others for their survival. > > If that's the case, then autism has always been with us at some > steady, but largely overlooked rate. Growing awareness and better > diagnostics have certainly helped us identify and count more people > with the condition, who might have been mislabeled as " quirky " > or " nerdy " a decade ago. > > But if that's autism, then the kids that I have met suffer from some > other condition entirely. When I talk about " curing " autism, I am > not talking about curing the " neurodiverse. " > > I am talking about kids who begin talking and then, suddenly, never > say another word. > > I'm talking about kids who may never learn to read, write, tie their > shoes or fall in love. > > I'm talking about kids who sometimes wail in torture at three in the > morning because something inside them hurts like a burning coal, but > they can't say what or where it is. > > I'm talking about kids who can barely keep food in their inflamed, > distressed guts, and when they do, it winds up in rivers of diarrhea > or swirls of feces spread on a favorite carpet or pet (no one said > this kind of " autism " was pretty). > > I'm talking about kids who escape from their home in a blaze of > alarms, only to be found hours later, freezing, alone and wandering > the Interstate. > > I'm talking about kids who have bitten their mother so hard and so > often, they are on a first name basis at the emergency room. > I'm talking about kids who spin like fireworks until they fall and > crack their heads, kids who will play with a pencil but not with > their sister, kids who stare at nothing and scream at everything and > don't even realize it when their dad comes home from work. > > These are the kids I want to see cured. And I don't believe they > have " autism. " > > Scientists tell us that 1-in-104 American boys are currently > diagnosed with some form of autism spectrum disorder. But the > mildest, " high functioning " forms of autism have seemingly little in > common with the most severe or even moderate cases. > > My hunch (and yes, that is all it is) is that most of these kids do > not have " autism " at all, and it's probably time we started calling > it something else. > > American kids are in huge trouble. One in six has a learning > disability. Asthma, diabetes, allergies and arthritis are ravaging > their bodies in growing numbers. And little of this is due > to " better diagnostics " or " greater awareness. " > > It can only be attributed to radical changes in our environment over > the last 10-20 years. There is something, or more likely some things > in our modern air, water, food and drugs that are making genetically > susceptible children sick, and we need to find out what they are. > Mercury remains a logical candidate for contributing to " autism > spectrum disorders, " either alone or in combination with other > environmental insults. Mercury exposure can kill brain cells. It can > cause loss of speech and eye contact, digestive and immune > dysfunction, > social withdrawal and anxiety, and repetitive and self-injurious > behaviors. > > So maybe we should leave the autistics in peace and focus on these > environmentally toxic kids and what it is that ails them. > Maybe what these kids have is not autism, but something like, > say, " Environmentally-acquired Neuroimmune Disorder, " which we could > call E.N.D. (Great slogan: " Let's End E.N.D.). > > Maybe that would explain why a recent CDC-funded study of the San > Francisco Bay Area showed that kids with " autism " were 50% more > likely to be born in neighborhoods with high levels of airborne > toxins, especially mercury. If a second study underway in Baltimore > yields > similar data, it will be that much harder to defend the " better > diagnosis " argument, (other studies have shown an association > between autism rates and proximity to coal-fired power plants). > > So maybe what we have here is just a semantic failure to > communicate. Columbus thought he had met " Indians, " and we only > recently began to use the term " Native American. " > > Columbus was not in the Indies, mercury doesn't cause autism, and > there is no autism epidemic > > " We have allowed (the drugs) industry to subvert the rules of > science. We have watched quietly as governments and academics have > colluded with industry to hide information critical to our patients. > We have remained silent as our medical schools have churned out > graduates who have no knowledge of the dilemmas and scandals of > medicine. We have allowed many of our medical journals to become > corrupted and timid, " - Dr Aubrey Blumsohn > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.