Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Interesting. I wonder what the actual recipe is as the website does not state. CountryGirl <ruthful@...> wrote: http://exchange.healthwell.com/nutritionsciencenews/nsn_backs/Aug_00/cancer.cfm From The August 2000 Issue of Nutrition Science News Nutritional Soup for Cancer An enormous amount of scientific literature shows beyond a reasonable doubt that many components of fruits, vegetables, herbs and mushrooms have the ability to retard and treat cancer�at least in animals and test tubes.1-5 Similar results in human studies, on the other hand, are few and far between, primarily because human studies have yet to be performed. One exception was the fish-oil study reported in the January 1998 issue of Cancer, in which a large, well-designed, double-blind study showed fish oil more than doubled the survival time of patients with advanced cancers of the breast, colon, lung and pancreas.6 Tragically, these encouraging results did not catch the interest of the medical profession, the media or the public. Nor did the big cancer organizations and institutions put their prestige or money on the line in order to replicate the study. Perhaps their interest will perk up with news of a nutritional broth that may have tripled the survival time of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Non-small cell lung cancer kills more than 400,000 Americans each year. Knowing conventional therapies are only marginally effective in treating this condition,7 researchers at the Connecticut Institute for Aging and Cancer in Milford along with those at the Czech Republic's University of Palacky tested an experimental nutritional treatment on six patients with advanced (Stage III or Stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer compared to 13 comparable lung cancer victims who did not receive the treatment. The design, however, was not double-blind, meaning both patients and doctors knew who had received the therapy and who had not. Regardless of which group patients were in, each continued their standard chemotherapy treatments. The researchers' experimental cancer treatment was nothing more or less than 30 g a day of soup stock prepared from a broad array of herbs, vegetables and mushrooms, including soybeans, shiitake mushrooms (Lentinus edodes), mung beans, red dates, scallions, garlic (Allium sativum), lentils, leeks, hawthorn fruit (Crataegus pinnatifida), onions, ginseng (Panax spp.), angelica root ( spp.), licorice (Glycyrrhiza spp.), dandelion root (Taraxacum officinale), senegal root (Polygala senega), ginger (Zingiber officinalis), olives, sesame seeds and parsley. The complex is now a commercially available product produced in Milford, Conn. Although vegetable soup chemotherapy may sound silly, a 24-month follow-up revealed remarkable results. For example, control patients lost an average of 11.6 percent of their body weight, while those taking the vegetable soup lost only 2.1 percent. Moreover, vegetable soup patients scored much higher on their day-to-day quality of life function tests as measured by the standard Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Among control subjects, KPS scores fell from a respectable 78 at the start to a struggling 55 within three months, while the vegetable soup patients' average score actually improved from 75 at the start to a follow-up value of 80. The most impressive result of this study, however, was the apparent survival advantage of those taking the experimental broth. Excluding three patients who died early, the median survival among the remaining 10 control patients was 4.5 months, with a 95 percent confidence range of four to seven months. In contrast, half the soup patients were still alive at 15.5 months, with a 95 percent confidence range of nine to 18 months. Thus, the broth treatment more than tripled the median survival rate, far surpassing the power of any conventional therapy. Of course, these wonderful results could be a fluke. Larger, double-blind and better-controlled studies may show that vegetable soup is not, in fact, effective as a cancer treatment. But considering there is a chance that it may be, the question is whether such pivotal research will actually be performed. Preliminary signs do offer a smidgen of hope, as the research report itself acknowledges several internationally respected leaders of the orthodox cancer elite. Perhaps one or more of these " union " leaders will place their personal prestige on the line in order to vouch for continued research into the role herbs, fruits and vegetables play in cancer prevention and cure. If so, a large double-blind study could start promptly, and, given the deadly nature of lung cancer, the results would follow quickly. The interests of both patients and scientists would be served by determining if a bowl of mere vegetable soup has the power to double as a chemotherapy treatment. N. Podell, M.D., M.P.H., is director of the Podell Medical Center in New Providence, N.J. References 1. Hartwell JL. Plants used against cancer: a survey. (Lloydia; 1971. p 30:379-416; 31:71-170, 32: 70-107, 153-205, 247-96�1969. 33:97-194, 288-92�1970. 34:103-60, 204-55, 301-60, 368-438�1971. 2. SM, et al. Protection against metastasis of radiation-induced thymic lymphosarcoma and weight loss in C57BL/6NCrlBR mice by an autoclave resistant factor present in soybeans. Radiat Res 1992;132:259-62. 3. G. Genistein and biochanin A inhibit the growth of human prostate cancer cells not epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine autophosphorylation. Prostate 1993;22:335-45. 4.Shamsuddkin AM, Ullah A. Suppression of large intestinal cancer in F344 rats by inositol hexaphosphate. Carcinogenesis 1988;9:577-80. 5. Chihara G, et al. Antitumor and metastasis-inhibitory activities of lentinan as an immunomodulator: an overview. Cancer Detect Prev Suppl 1987;1:423-43. 6. Gogos C, et. al. Dietary Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids plus vitamin E restore immunodeficiency and prolong survival for severely ill patients with generalized malignancy: a randomized control trial. Cancer 1998;82:395-402. 7. Sun AS, et al. Phase I/II study of stage II and IV non-small cell lung cancer patients taking a specific dietary supplement. Nutr Cancer 1999;34(1):62-9. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 I'm thinking reference number one might give more info. I'm sure it is researchable. You could google N Podell and see if he would share the recipe. Donna Re: Nutritional Cancer Soup Interesting. I wonder what the actual recipe is as the website does not state. N. Podell, M.D., M.P.H., is director of the Podell Medical Center in New Providence, N.J. References 1. Hartwell JL. Plants used against cancer: a survey. (Lloydia; 1971. p 30:379-416; 31:71-170, 32: 70-107, 153-205, 247-96�1969. 33:97-194, 288-92�1970. 34:103-60, 204-55, 301-60, 368-438�1971. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Donna, I think the ingredients listed in the article is the best one can do with this limited info. Apparently reference #1's author, Hartwell is dead and his book is considered rare and out of print. Even in his heyday and his position it is obvious from the info I found below (worth reading - very interesting) that the NCI back in 1938 was invested in the Pharmaceutical Industry. The ingredients I would consider to be very potent but I don't think they are all listed. I do suppose with further research one could be creative regarding additional herbs and veggies. ******************************************************************** The researchers' experimental cancer treatment was nothing more or less than 30 g a day of soup stock prepared from a broad array of herbs, vegetables and mushrooms, including soybeans, shiitake mushrooms (Lentinus edodes), mung beans, red dates, scallions, garlic (Allium sativum), lentils, leeks, hawthorn fruit (Crataegus pinnatifida), onions, ginseng (Panax spp.), angelica root ( spp.), licorice (Glycyrrhiza spp.), dandelion root (Taraxacum officinale), senegal root (Polygala senega), ginger (Zingiber officinalis), olives, sesame seeds and parsley. The complex is now a commercially available product produced in Milford, Conn. The quotation on the previous page was taken from a rare book, entitled Plants Used Against Cancer* by Dr. L. Hartwell, who worked at the National Cancer Institute from 1938 (in fact, according to Ralph W. Moss, was one of its founders) until his retirement from the NCI's Natural Products Section (which he also founded) in 1975. He studied botanical sources for cancer treatment for most of his career. The book was published in 1981 by Quarterman Publications in Lawrence, Massachusetts, and although it is Hartwell's most quoted work and it's probably safe to say it was his " magnum opus, " it still was one of only a hundred or more papers and books which Hartwell authored. Not long after the book was published Quarterman Publications went out of business and Dr. Hartwell died. We own an original hardbound copy of the book and keep it at our offices. Hartwell was born in 1906 and educated at Harvard. He earned in bachelor's degree in 1927; master's in 1929; and a doctorate in 1935. He was employed by both DuPont and Interchemical Corporation before his association with the National Cancer Institute in 1938. As head of the National Products Section, Hartwell devoted himself to the reserach and administration of cancer research. He was honored with a seat on the editorial board of the Journal of Ethnopharmacology as well as membership in the professional societies: the American Chemical Society, the American Society of Pharmacognosy, the Society for Economic Botany, and the Phytochemical Society of North America. Hartwell died on March 22, 1991 in Washington, D.C., where he resided with his wife, Ann. We feel that the following quotation, taken from the book's foreword by Jim Duke, is a story worth telling. As you read this excerpt, remember that it was written in January, 1982: " ... I view ['s book] as one epitaph to the cancer-screening program involving the National Cancer Institute with the U.S. Department of Agriculture for nearly 25 years. In a blow to natural-products chemistry in the United States, the Board of Scientific Counsellors, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, voted on October 2, 1981, to abolish the NCI research contract program concerned with the development of antitumor agents from plants. I fear this signals the end of significant government-sponsored research in the United States on medicinal plants, leaving research to the pharmaceutical firms, who have shown relative disinterest in plant products. According to the OTA (Office of Technology Assessment, 1981) Project Proposal, approved by Congress, Technologies for Sustaining Tropical Forest Resources (p. 15), " The National Cancer Institute has screened about 35,000 higher plants species for activity against cancer; as of 1977 about 3,000 of these had demonstrated reproducible activity; a small fraction were appropriate for screening should perhaps be accelerated. " Apparently, Congress had not anticipated the closing down of the plant screening program. In 1978, as a longtime student of herbal medicine, I changed places with Dr. R.E. Perdue as leader of the Medicinal Plant Resources Laboratory of the USDA. Although no exciting new leads developed during my association with the program, they may well reside untested in the hundreds of plant specimens that came in from Australia, China, Ecuador, Madaagascar, and Venezuela after the program was ordered phased out. I fear that the long-range implications are that, as a result of this cutback, some plant species with anticancer activity will suffer extinction before they are ever studied. Some natural drugs that could save thousands of lives and alleviate much suffering will disappear from the face of the earth, irretrievable, without ever being used... We are aware of a number of cases involving Hartwell's work -- where higher-appointed authorities within the NCI, acting in concert with friends in the pharmaceutical industry, would squash a project that showed real promise in the area of cancer research. One of these was an herbal project called " ammatosin, " developed over a twenty year period by a phytopharmacologist who has been reported to be the original inspiration behind the movie, Medicine Man (1992), Dr. Wilburn H. Ferguson. [The fictional story, however, takes place in neighboring Brazil.] As the story is told by Ferguson family members, Wilburn went to the Amazonian jungles of eastern Equador in the 1950's to research a herbal product that was reported to cure cancer in all but the rarest of cases. He spent about twenty years reducing the formula, which was part of the oral ethnobotanical pharmacopaeia of the Jivaro indians, from 35 herbs down to 7 -- in other words, he left in the formula only those herbal components which were shown to make a contribution to the cancerolytic process. A series of clinical human studies were initiated, all of which demonstrated that the product worked as well as any control pharmaceutical to which it was compared. (One set of clinicals were conducted in Pama Valley, California - 1959-1960; to be followed by other clinicals that produced similar results). Dr. Hartwell was first notified of these results by Professor in a letter dated April 6, 1971 -- upon which Hartwell began investigations of his own. Ferguson attempted to get funding from Zimmer (owner of Men's Warehouse in Houston), but was unsuccessful. Hartwell was asked to drop the investigation, funding was never obtained as a result of a lack of any " official " approval, and today, the product is made privately by members of the Ferguson family -- who refuse to do anything further to bring the formula to the public for fear of reprisal from regulatory agencies. Such is the legacy of the best minds in natural, alternative botanical solutions to cancer treatment in the modern age. And no such list could be properly compiled without including the name of Hartwell. Footnotes & Relevant Links --------------------------------- * --- Plants Used Against Cancer was published in hardbound in 1982 by Quarterman Publications, Inc. (last address of record: 5 South Union Street, Lawrence, Massachusetts 01843). We went to great lengths to contact any remnants of Quarterman in early 1993 -- to no avail. Their last phone number was (508) 689-0207, and the offices were in a structure known as the " Ere Mill Building. " We could find no one who would admit knowing anything about the company in Lawrence. For the record, the book copyright page reads, " This work is a facsimile compilation of the serialization entitled, " Plants Used Against Cancer. A Survey " by L. Hartwell which appeared in Lloydia in eleven installments between 1967 and 1971. The original text has been reproduced chronologically with the pages renumbered consecutively. A forward has been added to this edition. " [by Jim Duke, dated January, 1982] Plants Used Against Cancer was part of a two volume " Bioactive Plants " series published by Quarterman. The first volume was called Medicinal Uses of Plants by Indian Tribes of Nevada by Percy Train, R. Hendrich, and W. Archer. Additional identifying information on Plants Used Against Cancer includes the following: Library of Congress Catalog Number: 81-85230 International Standard Book Number: 0-88000-130-5 Printed in the United States of America Herbalgram article on Hartwell Chinese Tree Extract -- a valuable cancer-fighting botanical source, the discovery of which was a Hartwell contribution Hartwell and the Yew Tree discovery Comments on his work in uncovering plant-based cancerolytics Comments on Hartwell by Ralph W. Moss The Hoxsey Formula -- Hartwell founded cancer-fighting properties in virtually all the herbs used in the much maligned internal Hoxsey formula. CountryGirl <ruthful@...> wrote: I'm thinking reference number one might give more info. I'm sure it is researchable. You could google N Podell and see if he would share the recipe. Donna Re: Nutritional Cancer Soup Interesting. I wonder what the actual recipe is as the website does not state. N. Podell, M.D., M.P.H., is director of the Podell Medical Center in New Providence, N.J. References 1. Hartwell JL. Plants used against cancer: a survey. (Lloydia; 1971. p 30:379-416; 31:71-170, 32: 70-107, 153-205, 247-96�1969. 33:97-194, 288-92�1970. 34:103-60, 204-55, 301-60, 368-438�1971. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.