Re: ? for Saul about ozone flow rates etc

[Guest guest]

I am so glad that I did not have a sauna more powerful than Saul's Alpha unit.

It produced healing/cleansing reactions in the beginning that were as powerful

as I could handle. I therefore assume that it will do the trick long term. I

am still getting sufficient cleansing rashes for me to not want a more powerful

unit.

Best wishes and much love, Ken

Ken Gullan

Institute for Research Integration (IRI), San Diego, CA 92106-2424

IRI is a 501C(3) non-profit corporation established to help children with

developmental difficulties.

To contact me off-list use kengullan@... or call 619-222-1104

? for Saul about ozone flow rates etc

Also, this is from lyme and rife list, is this true? Seems to me like

the sauna is already very powerful.

Hi........most of the German practitioners who use ozone will tell

you that 60 ug at less than .5 litres per minute isn't even close to

being strong enough for a sauna. I no longer have links since this

was from reading over a year ago. There are alot of articles from

doctors who say you must have super high concentrations and a flow

rate of more than 1 lpm. Reading these articles is what forced me to

find something stronger..........and it is indeed stronger....Robb

[Guest guest]

Dear Jill,

There aren't any comparable studies for insufflation or

transdermal that I am aware of. AHT has had the lion's share of

research, since it deals with blood, which is where research

scientists like to focus.

German doctors are not using ozone saunas as far as I know. It wouldn't

be sanctioned by their ozone association, which is locked into AHT

and rectal insufflation and occasional limb bagging. So this looks like

bogus

information. Notice that no doctor's name is associated with the 'info'.

We get excellent results with our equipment. Higher concentrations are not

going to improve our results, reversal of terminal cancer. It is well known

from

Prof. Bocci's work that higher concentrations are immune suppressive.

Further, excessively high flow rates are not going to be contained within a

sauna, and that will just put a lot of ozone in the air, exactly where you

don't want it.

So this whole line of 'info' is invalid.

Best of Health!

Dr. Saul Pressman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\

-------------------------------

----Original Message Follows----

From: " jill1313 " <jill1313@...>

Reply-oxyplus

oxyplus

Subject: ? for Saul about ozone flow rates etc

Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:43:50 -0000

Saul, in regards to Bocci's article about the appropriate amount (not

too little not too much in AhT) are there any comparable studies so

we know what that is with insufflation and sauna, besides

anecdotal/clinical response?

Also, this is from lyme and rife list, is this true? Seems to me like

the sauna is already very powerful.

Hi........most of the German practitioners who use ozone will tell

you that 60 ug at less than .5 litres per minute isn't even close to

being strong enough for a sauna. I no longer have links since this

was from reading over a year ago. There are alot of articles from

doctors who say you must have super high concentrations and a flow

rate of more than 1 lpm. Reading these articles is what forced me to

find something stronger..........and it is indeed stronger....Robb

Harmony4life

www.highpowermagneticpulser.com

[Lyme-and-rife] Re: Ozone Generator

WHere have you read this? What kind of results were you looking for

from ozone and what did you get with a more powerful generator? His

alpha is pretty strong.

> I've read many many places that say the flow should be far greater

and far stronger than what Saul Pressman recommends. I wasn't

getting any results until I came up with the more powerful

generator. Robb

> Harmony4life

> www.highpowermagneticpulser.com

[Guest guest]

Thx, I'm going to post this over on the lyme & rife group where the

original discussion came up. For me, it is already very powerful, I

certainly would not want *more*!

> > I've read many many places that say the flow should be far

greater

> and far stronger than what Saul Pressman recommends. I wasn't

> getting any results until I came up with the more powerful

> generator. Robb

> > Harmony4life

> > www.highpowermagneticpulser.com