Guest guest Posted February 6, 2008 Report Share Posted February 6, 2008 I am not a medical doctor by any means, but when you read articles, you have to go beyond what is in the printed word and do further research. Patient 1: <<took medications for hypertension, anemia, and mild renal insufficiency>> She could have been suffering from renal insufficiency, which may have been the reason for the metabolic acidosis. Metabolic acidosis is caused by a DISEASE process. <<an inability of the kidneys to excrete the dietary hydrogen (H+) load, and an increase in the generation of H+ that is due to the addition of H+(lactic acid or ketoacids) or to the loss of bicarbonate (HCO 3-) due to inappropriate wasting by the kidney or the gastrointestinal tract.>> The autopsy report found: <<peritonitis with fecal contamination of the peritoneal cavity, but no perforation was identified>> Again, it is important to read the actual words. Because no perforation was identified does not mean there wasn't a perforation -- only that they were unable to identify where it was. A bowel perforation, diagnosed or not, can be fatal. That they found fecal matter in her peritoneal cavity, where it should never be found, is suggestive there was some kind of leakage somewhere. It doesn't just get there by osmosis. http://www.emedicine.com/emerg/topic312.htm Patient 2. They really do not give enough history on this woman for the average reader to make any conclusion as to what caused her problems. Toxicology reports were negative, although they don't say in the article what meds she was taking. No sepsis was found. Although she was found to have acute pulmonary edema, there are many other reasons for pulmonary edema that, IMO, have nothing to do with KT. The patient fully recovered and was discharged. http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic1955.htm Finally, the article stated: <<Although the investigation described in this report did not establish a causal link between the illness of the two women and their consumption of Kombucha tea, reasons for the occurrence and severity of the lactic acidosis in both cases have not been determined.>> So, regardless of what caused the illness in these two women, a causal link with drinking KT was never established. I have been drinking KT for almost a year now. I brew mine 12-14 days, sometimes longer as I like a much more tart tea than most. I drink at least 16 ounces a day, sometimes more. I give my body what it craves. If I have 16 ounces and I want more later, I have more. After reading this article and just doing 15 minutes of research on it, I find it odd that they write it trying to put a connection with these two ladies' illnesses and KT consumption as that is the only thing they have in common. There were over 100 other folks in the same town that had KT from the same " family " of mushrooms and they experienced no ill effects. I would suspect it was the health history of the individuals that caused their problems and not the KT. Oh, and this article is 12 years old. I would think if KT was toxic, there would be more reported studies, so that is something else you have to take into consideration. That's my $0.02 worth. -- April The Lotus rises from the mud and dirt Sweet Lotus Creations www.sweetlotuscreations.com Heartland Soapmakers Association www.heartlandsoapmakers.com On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Heinz <luv2scrap@...> wrote: > I know that there will always be naysayers... but this article scared me > a bit and I wanted to know what you all thought of it. > > http://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/preview/mmwrhtml/00039742.htm > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.