Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:07:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, drumthis2001@... writes: NT's let their passions rule and end up with pre-nuptial agreement situations and, Aspies are passionate about "narrow interests". That makes me think the psychologists hate us because they call us narrow minded and in other articles the same thing, "conservative". Narrow minded is not a compliment and the labelers think that they can ruin us, but they can't because we're above their passion for making us look stupid. Their passions rule them only to destroy them. With Aspies are passions make us & cannot break us. A pre-nup isn't just an NT thing, its a good idea for everyone. I think too many people have a too romantic notion of marriage which is based on the emotions of the moment. When said marriage fails, those emotion can turn 180 degrees and cause a lot of trouble. This is when that pre-nup helps. Everything was decided when the couple was on better terms. I've seen a lot of couples tear into each other and even use their children as weapons against the each other, because they didn't have a pre-nup. It just makes sense to have one. Quote
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:07:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, drumthis2001@... writes: NT's let their passions rule and end up with pre-nuptial agreement situations and, Aspies are passionate about "narrow interests". That makes me think the psychologists hate us because they call us narrow minded and in other articles the same thing, "conservative". Narrow minded is not a compliment and the labelers think that they can ruin us, but they can't because we're above their passion for making us look stupid. Their passions rule them only to destroy them. With Aspies are passions make us & cannot break us. A pre-nup isn't just an NT thing, its a good idea for everyone. I think too many people have a too romantic notion of marriage which is based on the emotions of the moment. When said marriage fails, those emotion can turn 180 degrees and cause a lot of trouble. This is when that pre-nup helps. Everything was decided when the couple was on better terms. I've seen a lot of couples tear into each other and even use their children as weapons against the each other, because they didn't have a pre-nup. It just makes sense to have one. Quote
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 Ah, I see. So if an engineer (me, for example) married an engineer, my child would be more likely to be autistic. Someone needs to get their facts straight-esp. with that last sentence. Asperger's Syndrome people hardly have average intelligence. Far above it. environmental1st2003 <no_reply > wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/01/30/naut30.xml & sSheet=/news/2006/01/30/ixhome.htmlParents' marriage choice may lead to autismThe recent rise in autism may have been driven by the tendency of like-minded engineers, physicists, mathematicians and other "systemizers" to marry each other, according to a Cambridge University professor.Around one child in every 100 - mostly males - has autism and the number of cases seems to be on the increase, though some argue that it is due to greater awareness and changes in diagnosis.In a new study, Prof Simon Baron-Cohen believes the impaired ability of people with autism to communicate, recognise emotions and socialise is linked with the same genes that enable a person to systemize - find the laws that govern how a system works.This is more often a male trait and present among scientists.He has uncovered clues that suggest that when systemizers marry they have a higher risk of having children with autism. And he believes that systemizers are also more attracted to each other than one would expect by chance, due to what he calls "assortative mating".Systemizers feel more comfortable in the company of each other rather than that of what he calls empathizers. "We have found clues in a range of studies we have conducted since 1997 that assortative mating is going on."In the journal Archives of Diseases of Childhood this month, Prof Baron-Cohen reports various suggestive clues to link systemizing with autism.According to a survey of 1,000 members of the National Autistic Society, fathers and grandfathers of children with autistic spectrum conditions are twice as likely to work in a systemizing profession such as engineering.Students in the natural sciences have a higher number of relatives with autism than do students in the humanities, and mathematicians have a higher rate of autistic spectrum conditions compared with the general population.The theory that both parents of children with autism are strong systemizers is also evident from a study that shows both mothers and fathers score above average on a questionnaire that measures autistic traits.The parents are also faster at "visual search tasks" - in effect they have an unusually sharp eye for detail, just as their child with autism does - compared with the parents of unaffected children.Brain scan studies of mothers and fathers of children with autism have shown that the mothers have a masculinised pattern of brain activity, again suggesting they are strong systemizers.When all the evidence is taken together it suggests a genetic cause of autism, with both parents contributing genes that ultimately relate to a similar kind of mind: one with an affinity for thinking systematically. Prof Baron-Cohen says the rise in autism could be driven because assortative mating is becoming easier: recent years have seen a rise in mobility, an increase in the employment prospects of systemizers -notably in the computer industry - and a rise in the numbers of women studying mathematics, engineering and other systemizing subjects at university, where they are more likely to come into contact with systemizing men.He points out that the parents of children with autism may not have strong skills in such subjects, but that does not mean they are not strong systemizers. The parents may for example have a remarkable memory for the names of songs in their CD collection, or for dates or telephone numbers.He thinks the key characteristic is "exactness" in their style of thinking.In the spectrum of conditions that count as autism, the largest groups are classic autism and Asperger syndrome. Both share features: a difficulty in developing social relationships, a difficulty in communication, the presence of unusually strong, narrow interests, and a strong adherence to routines.They differ in that in classic autism, the person might have an IQ at any point on the scale, even in the learning disabled range, and the person invariably had a language delay as a toddler.In Asperger syndrome, the person is always at least average in IQ, and may be well above average, and talked on time as a toddler.rhighfield@...If you love something, set it free! So it is with books. See what I mean atwww.bookcrossing.com/friend/nheckoblogcritics.orghttp://notesfromnancy.blogspot.com Heckofreelance proofreadernancygailus@... Bring words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with . Quote
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 NT's let their passions rule and end up with pre-nuptial agreement situations and, Aspies are passionate about "narrow interests". That makes me think the psychologists hate us because they call us narrow minded and in other articles the same thing, "conservative". Narrow minded is not a compliment and the labelers think that they can ruin us, but they can't because we're above their passion for making us look stupid. Their passions rule them only to destroy them. With Aspies are passions make us & cannot break us. Hecko <nancygailus@...> wrote: Ah, I see. So if an engineer (me, for example) married an engineer, my child would be more likely to be autistic. Someone needs to get their facts straight-esp. with that last sentence. Asperger's Syndrome people hardly have average intelligence. Far above it. environmental1st2003 <no_reply > wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/01/30/naut30.xml & sSheet=/news/2006/01/30/ixhome.htmlParents' marriage choice may lead to autismThe recent rise in autism may have been driven by the tendency of like-minded engineers, physicists, mathematicians and other "systemizers" to marry each other, according to a Cambridge University professor.Around one child in every 100 - mostly males - has autism and the number of cases seems to be on the increase, though some argue that it is due to greater awareness and changes in diagnosis.In a new study, Prof Simon Baron-Cohen believes the impaired ability of people with autism to communicate, recognise emotions and socialise is linked with the same genes that enable a person to systemize - find the laws that govern how a system works.This is more often a male trait and present among scientists.He has uncovered clues that suggest that when systemizers marry they have a higher risk of having children with autism. And he believes that systemizers are also more attracted to each other than one would expect by chance, due to what he calls "assortative mating".Systemizers feel more comfortable in the company of each other rather than that of what he calls empathizers. "We have found clues in a range of studies we have conducted since 1997 that assortative mating is going on."In the journal Archives of Diseases of Childhood this month, Prof Baron-Cohen reports various suggestive clues to link systemizing with autism.According to a survey of 1,000 members of the National Autistic Society, fathers and grandfathers of children with autistic spectrum conditions are twice as likely to work in a systemizing profession such as engineering.Students in the natural sciences have a higher number of relatives with autism than do students in the humanities, and mathematicians have a higher rate of autistic spectrum conditions compared with the general population.The theory that both parents of children with autism are strong systemizers is also evident from a study that shows both mothers and fathers score above average on a questionnaire that measures autistic traits.The parents are also faster at "visual search tasks" - in effect they have an unusually sharp eye for detail, just as their child with autism does - compared with the parents of unaffected children.Brain scan studies of mothers and fathers of children with autism have shown that the mothers have a masculinised pattern of brain activity, again suggesting they are strong systemizers.When all the evidence is taken together it suggests a genetic cause of autism, with both parents contributing genes that ultimately relate to a similar kind of mind: one with an affinity for thinking systematically. Prof Baron-Cohen says the rise in autism could be driven because assortative mating is becoming easier: recent years have seen a rise in mobility, an increase in the employment prospects of systemizers -notably in the computer industry - and a rise in the numbers of women studying mathematics, engineering and other systemizing subjects at university, where they are more likely to come into contact with systemizing men.He points out that the parents of children with autism may not have strong skills in such subjects, but that does not mean they are not strong systemizers. The parents may for example have a remarkable memory for the names of songs in their CD collection, or for dates or telephone numbers.He thinks the key characteristic is "exactness" in their style of thinking.In the spectrum of conditions that count as autism, the largest groups are classic autism and Asperger syndrome. Both share features: a difficulty in developing social relationships, a difficulty in communication, the presence of unusually strong, narrow interests, and a strong adherence to routines.They differ in that in classic autism, the person might have an IQ at any point on the scale, even in the learning disabled range, and the person invariably had a language delay as a toddler.In Asperger syndrome, the person is always at least average in IQ, and may be well above average, and talked on time as a toddler.rhighfield@...If you love something, set it free! So it is with books. See what I mean atwww.bookcrossing.com/friend/nheckoblogcritics.orghttp://notesfromnancy.blogspot.com Heckofreelance proofreadernancygailus@... Bring words and photos together (easily) withPhotoMail - it's free and works with . Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, more on new and used cars. Quote
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 NT's let their passions rule and end up with pre-nuptial agreement situations and, Aspies are passionate about "narrow interests". That makes me think the psychologists hate us because they call us narrow minded and in other articles the same thing, "conservative". Narrow minded is not a compliment and the labelers think that they can ruin us, but they can't because we're above their passion for making us look stupid. Their passions rule them only to destroy them. With Aspies are passions make us & cannot break us. Hecko <nancygailus@...> wrote: Ah, I see. So if an engineer (me, for example) married an engineer, my child would be more likely to be autistic. Someone needs to get their facts straight-esp. with that last sentence. Asperger's Syndrome people hardly have average intelligence. Far above it. environmental1st2003 <no_reply > wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/01/30/naut30.xml & sSheet=/news/2006/01/30/ixhome.htmlParents' marriage choice may lead to autismThe recent rise in autism may have been driven by the tendency of like-minded engineers, physicists, mathematicians and other "systemizers" to marry each other, according to a Cambridge University professor.Around one child in every 100 - mostly males - has autism and the number of cases seems to be on the increase, though some argue that it is due to greater awareness and changes in diagnosis.In a new study, Prof Simon Baron-Cohen believes the impaired ability of people with autism to communicate, recognise emotions and socialise is linked with the same genes that enable a person to systemize - find the laws that govern how a system works.This is more often a male trait and present among scientists.He has uncovered clues that suggest that when systemizers marry they have a higher risk of having children with autism. And he believes that systemizers are also more attracted to each other than one would expect by chance, due to what he calls "assortative mating".Systemizers feel more comfortable in the company of each other rather than that of what he calls empathizers. "We have found clues in a range of studies we have conducted since 1997 that assortative mating is going on."In the journal Archives of Diseases of Childhood this month, Prof Baron-Cohen reports various suggestive clues to link systemizing with autism.According to a survey of 1,000 members of the National Autistic Society, fathers and grandfathers of children with autistic spectrum conditions are twice as likely to work in a systemizing profession such as engineering.Students in the natural sciences have a higher number of relatives with autism than do students in the humanities, and mathematicians have a higher rate of autistic spectrum conditions compared with the general population.The theory that both parents of children with autism are strong systemizers is also evident from a study that shows both mothers and fathers score above average on a questionnaire that measures autistic traits.The parents are also faster at "visual search tasks" - in effect they have an unusually sharp eye for detail, just as their child with autism does - compared with the parents of unaffected children.Brain scan studies of mothers and fathers of children with autism have shown that the mothers have a masculinised pattern of brain activity, again suggesting they are strong systemizers.When all the evidence is taken together it suggests a genetic cause of autism, with both parents contributing genes that ultimately relate to a similar kind of mind: one with an affinity for thinking systematically. Prof Baron-Cohen says the rise in autism could be driven because assortative mating is becoming easier: recent years have seen a rise in mobility, an increase in the employment prospects of systemizers -notably in the computer industry - and a rise in the numbers of women studying mathematics, engineering and other systemizing subjects at university, where they are more likely to come into contact with systemizing men.He points out that the parents of children with autism may not have strong skills in such subjects, but that does not mean they are not strong systemizers. The parents may for example have a remarkable memory for the names of songs in their CD collection, or for dates or telephone numbers.He thinks the key characteristic is "exactness" in their style of thinking.In the spectrum of conditions that count as autism, the largest groups are classic autism and Asperger syndrome. Both share features: a difficulty in developing social relationships, a difficulty in communication, the presence of unusually strong, narrow interests, and a strong adherence to routines.They differ in that in classic autism, the person might have an IQ at any point on the scale, even in the learning disabled range, and the person invariably had a language delay as a toddler.In Asperger syndrome, the person is always at least average in IQ, and may be well above average, and talked on time as a toddler.rhighfield@...If you love something, set it free! So it is with books. See what I mean atwww.bookcrossing.com/friend/nheckoblogcritics.orghttp://notesfromnancy.blogspot.com Heckofreelance proofreadernancygailus@... Bring words and photos together (easily) withPhotoMail - it's free and works with . Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, more on new and used cars. Quote
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 I guess it's just another theory to throw on the pile. First come ideas, then the ideas are taken by others to find proofs. Maybe someday we'll put all the theories together or scap them for the answer! I read another article somewhere that said Silicon Valley is becoming a gathering place for Aspies who marry another Aspie with the hopes of getting an Aspie child, but that two Aspies create a profoundly autistic child. So are they saying two engineers = an Aspie and two Aspies = a profoundly autistic child? I'd like to see some examples or proof of this. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml? > xml=/news/2006/01/30/naut30.xml & sSheet=/news/2006/01/30/ixhome.html > > Parents' marriage choice may lead to autism > > The recent rise in autism may have been driven by the tendency of > like-minded engineers, physicists, mathematicians and > other " systemizers " to marry each other, according to a Cambridge > University professor. > > Around one child in every 100 - mostly males - has autism and the > number of cases seems to be on the increase, though some argue that > it is due to greater awareness and changes in diagnosis. > > In a new study, Prof Simon Baron-Cohen believes the impaired ability > of people with autism to communicate, recognise emotions and > socialise is linked with the same genes that enable a person to > systemize - find the laws that govern how a system works. > > This is more often a male trait and present among scientists. > > He has uncovered clues that suggest that when systemizers marry they > have a higher risk of having children with autism. And he believes > that systemizers are also more attracted to each other than one > would expect by chance, due to what he calls " assortative mating " . > > Systemizers feel more comfortable in the company of each other > rather than that of what he calls empathizers. " We have found clues > in a range of studies we have conducted since 1997 that assortative > mating is going on. " > > In the journal Archives of Diseases of Childhood this month, Prof > Baron-Cohen reports various suggestive clues to link systemizing > with autism. > > According to a survey of 1,000 members of the National Autistic > Society, fathers and grandfathers of children with autistic spectrum > conditions are twice as likely to work in a systemizing profession > such as engineering. > > Students in the natural sciences have a higher number of relatives > with autism than do students in the humanities, and mathematicians > have a higher rate of autistic spectrum conditions compared with the > general population. > > The theory that both parents of children with autism are strong > systemizers is also evident from a study that shows both mothers and > fathers score above average on a questionnaire that measures > autistic traits. > > The parents are also faster at " visual search tasks " - in effect > they have an unusually sharp eye for detail, just as their child > with autism does - compared with the parents of unaffected children. > > Brain scan studies of mothers and fathers of children with autism > have shown that the mothers have a masculinised pattern of brain > activity, again suggesting they are strong systemizers. > > When all the evidence is taken together it suggests a genetic cause > of autism, with both parents contributing genes that ultimately > relate to a similar kind of mind: one with an affinity for thinking > systematically. > > Prof Baron-Cohen says the rise in autism could be driven because > assortative mating is becoming easier: recent years have seen a rise > in mobility, an increase in the employment prospects of systemizers - > notably in the computer industry - and a rise in the numbers of > women studying mathematics, engineering and other systemizing > subjects at university, where they are more likely to come into > contact with systemizing men. > > He points out that the parents of children with autism may not have > strong skills in such subjects, but that does not mean they are not > strong systemizers. > > The parents may for example have a remarkable memory for the names > of songs in their CD collection, or for dates or telephone numbers. > > He thinks the key characteristic is " exactness " in their style of > thinking. > > In the spectrum of conditions that count as autism, the largest > groups are classic autism and Asperger syndrome. Both share > features: a difficulty in developing social relationships, a > difficulty in communication, the presence of unusually strong, > narrow interests, and a strong adherence to routines. > > They differ in that in classic autism, the person might have an IQ > at any point on the scale, even in the learning disabled range, and > the person invariably had a language delay as a toddler. > > In Asperger syndrome, the person is always at least average in IQ, > and may be well above average, and talked on time as a toddler. > > rhighfield@t... > > > > > > > > FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. > > Don't forget, there are links to other FAM sites on the Links page in the folder marked " Other FAM Sites. " > > > > Quote
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 That was my whole point. I mentioned the pre-nup because if one spouse makes all the money and signs a pre-nup that gives his wife half of what he owns when they get a divorce, how is that fair? Not to mention the fact that the court system favors women in a disgusting majority of cases for custody of the child. More women have jobs than men. The tables have tilted. VISIGOTH@... wrote: In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:07:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, drumthis2001@... writes: NT's let their passions rule and end up with pre-nuptial agreement situations and, Aspies are passionate about "narrow interests". That makes me think the psychologists hate us because they call us narrow minded and in other articles the same thing, "conservative". Narrow minded is not a compliment and the labelers think that they can ruin us, but they can't because we're above their passion for making us look stupid. Their passions rule them only to destroy them. With Aspies are passions make us & cannot break us. A pre-nup isn't just an NT thing, its a good idea for everyone. I think too many people have a too romantic notion of marriage which is based on the emotions of the moment. When said marriage fails, those emotion can turn 180 degrees and cause a lot of trouble. This is when that pre-nup helps. Everything was decided when the couple was on better terms. I've seen a lot of couples tear into each other and even use their children as weapons against the each other, because they didn't have a pre-nup. It just makes sense to have one. Bring words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with . Quote
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Posted January 30, 2006 That was my whole point. I mentioned the pre-nup because if one spouse makes all the money and signs a pre-nup that gives his wife half of what he owns when they get a divorce, how is that fair? Not to mention the fact that the court system favors women in a disgusting majority of cases for custody of the child. More women have jobs than men. The tables have tilted. VISIGOTH@... wrote: In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:07:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, drumthis2001@... writes: NT's let their passions rule and end up with pre-nuptial agreement situations and, Aspies are passionate about "narrow interests". That makes me think the psychologists hate us because they call us narrow minded and in other articles the same thing, "conservative". Narrow minded is not a compliment and the labelers think that they can ruin us, but they can't because we're above their passion for making us look stupid. Their passions rule them only to destroy them. With Aspies are passions make us & cannot break us. A pre-nup isn't just an NT thing, its a good idea for everyone. I think too many people have a too romantic notion of marriage which is based on the emotions of the moment. When said marriage fails, those emotion can turn 180 degrees and cause a lot of trouble. This is when that pre-nup helps. Everything was decided when the couple was on better terms. I've seen a lot of couples tear into each other and even use their children as weapons against the each other, because they didn't have a pre-nup. It just makes sense to have one. Bring words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with . Quote
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Posted January 31, 2006 Actually, as much as your logic makes sense, I have seen examples of 2 Aspies getting EITHER AS children or severely autistic children, or a few of each. In one of the cases, the mother was a very bright and unusual building engineer, in the other case, a highly sensitive music therapist. Both got several severely autistic children + one child that became a high judge and a highly skilled doctor, respectively. The young doctor is a crystal clear Aspie. The judge could be, but I'm not sure. I personally suspect the severe autism is due to the Aspling having inherited a dramatically more sensitive nervous system and immune system, so that even a very moderate amount of pathogens, allergens, toxins or stress from conception to early childhood is more likely to affect the Aspie baby adversely and cause cognitive and/or neurological impairment. Inger Re: Re: Parents' marriage choice may lead to autism In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:18:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, mikecarrie01@... writes: I read another article somewhere that said Silicon Valley is becoming a gathering place for Aspies who marry another Aspie with the hopes of getting an Aspie child, but that two Aspies create a profoundly autistic child. So are they saying two engineers = an Aspie and two Aspies = a profoundly autistic child? I'd like to see some examples or proof of this. I think all you would have to do is find a chart or report showing the prevalence of autism in Silicon Valley compared to years prior. I don't see any reason why this would not be happening. If Aspies are drawn to technical fields and Silicon Valley is a highly technical area, then it stands to reason that Aspies would congregate there. It also stands to reason that if AS is a rare trait, like say blue eyes, that if two people with AS marry their children will have a greater likelihood of being AS too, just like having a parent with blue eyes increases the odds of having children with blue eyes. Also, if two mildly autistic people had children, that there is an increased chance that their children may be profoundly autistic could also be true for the same reason. Quote
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Posted January 31, 2006 The doctor is a heart- & internal medicine specialist. He choose the same profession as his Aspie father. The judge isn't exactly like an ordinary judge, it's more of an office job. I don't know the exact title in English so I picked the closest word I could think of. Inger Re: Re: Parents' marriage choice may lead to autism > > > In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:18:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, mikecarrie01@y... writes: > I read another article somewhere that said Silicon Valley is becoming > a gathering place for Aspies who marry another Aspie with the hopes > of getting an Aspie child, but that two Aspies create a profoundly > autistic child. So are they saying two engineers = an Aspie and two > Aspies = a profoundly autistic child? I'd like to see some examples > or proof of this. > > I think all you would have to do is find a chart or report showing the prevalence of autism in Silicon Valley compared to years prior. > > I don't see any reason why this would not be happening. If Aspies are drawn to technical fields and Silicon Valley is a highly technical area, then it stands to reason that Aspies would congregate there. It also stands to reason that if AS is a rare trait, like say blue eyes, that if two people with AS marry their children will have a greater likelihood of being AS too, just like having a parent with blue eyes increases the odds of having children with blue eyes. Also, if two mildly autistic people had children, that there is an increased chance that their children may be profoundly autistic could also be true for the same reason. > > > > > FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. > > Don't forget, there are links to other FAM sites on the Links page in the folder marked " Other FAM Sites. " > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ > ! GROUPS LINKS > > a.. Visit your group " " on the web. > > b.. Quote
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Posted January 31, 2006 Yeah, it did seem too simplistic to me. I do wonder about the idea that AS occurs more in males. I wonder if it's just easier to spot in males. Quote
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2006 Report Posted January 31, 2006 " It's the off-duty " schmoozing " and " politicking " often associated with these professional roles that might be more problematic. " Ahhhhhhhhh you've hit the nail on the head here so to speak. Surprisinly enough I can do sales jobs and am good at them - although I will not knowingly lie - honesty can actually sell :-) I can't however sell myself or my own things very well :-( and when I was doing sales jobs I could not stand the fact that they expected me to also socialise with those that I worked with - to me it was just a job - not a social life. Also done office jobs in the past and loved the work - but the office politics I just didn't get involved in and didn't understand it either, although it appeared to be going on all around me (I think people tried to drag me into it, but I was a bit clueless) - it was obvious I could not stay in a job like that for too long - I was just interested in working. > > > A really social job like a judge or a doctor is a strange job > choice > > for an Aspie. > > Yes, but I think many such jobs have scripted roles, in a sense, that would make the actual job-function social interaction tolerable in a lot of cases. It's the off-duty " schmoozing " and " politicking " often associated with these professional roles that might be more problematic. > > Amy > Quote
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2006 Report Posted February 2, 2006 My friend Anne Marie (who is a member here but too busy IRL to participate right now) is an attorney. She's very good at it and is becoming very successful now. She has a combination of AS/ADHD. Inger Re: Re: Parents' marriage choice may > lead to autism > > > > > > In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:18:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > mikecarrie01@y... writes: > > I read another article somewhere that said Silicon Valley is > becoming > > a gathering place for Aspies who marry another Aspie with the > hopes > > of getting an Aspie child, but that two Aspies create a > profoundly > > autistic child. So are they saying two engineers = an Aspie and > two > > Aspies = a profoundly autistic child? I'd like to see some > examples > > or proof of this. > > > > I think all you would have to do is find a chart or report showing > the prevalence of autism in Silicon Valley compared to years prior. > > > > I don't see any reason why this would not be happening. If Aspies > are drawn to technical fields and Silicon Valley is a highly > technical area, then it stands to reason that Aspies would congregate > there. It also stands to reason that if AS is a rare trait, like say > blue eyes, that if two people with AS marry their children will have > a greater likelihood of being AS too, just like having a parent with > blue eyes increases the odds of having children with blue eyes. Also, > if two mildly autistic people had children, that there is an > increased chance that their children may be profoundly autistic could > also be true for the same reason. > > > > > > > > > > FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, > support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. > > > > Don't forget, there are links to other FAM sites on the Links page > in the folder marked " Other FAM Sites. " > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > ------------ > > ! GROUPS LINKS > > > > a.. Visit your group " " on the web. > > > > b.. Quote
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2006 Report Posted February 5, 2006 There are some attorney positions that do not require arguing before a court. An AS attorney would be good at the legal reasearch and legal writing aspects. I use to work for the IRS, working with tax attroneys. Our people very rarely went to court, mostly we gave advice and wrote legal documents. Everyone seems to look down on our agency, but most of the people I worked with were good people. Many attorneys said our agency was more ethical than most private law firms, because we never asked our people to bend our break the law for our behalf. I did not know anything about AS at the time, but looking back I see AS traits in many of the people I worked with. Two of the attorneys were mostly non-verbal, and one of them would always wait till I was away from my desk before leaving work for me. The head of our front office was disliked by many - she didn't smile, she did not have a pleasant voice, and she was very detail oriented (concidered to micro-mange by some), but she also had a toy train set up and some oversized stuffed animals in her office, overall this seems to suggest an aspie personality. There was another lady who was single and lived with lots of cats and often made remarks that seemed a bit rude (such as " is that your real hair? " ). There were a couple of employees who did things that could have been called stimming - one rocked back and forth in his chair almost constantly and one liked to drum his pencil on the desk. In general such aspie traits as low " social skills " and HSP were fairly common. And of course D.C. is almost notorious for the lack of fashion of it's government employees (people make jokes about it). Ilah > > > > > > Actually, as much as your logic makes sense, I have seen examples > > of 2 Aspies getting EITHER AS children or severely autistic > children, > > or a few of each. In one of the cases, the mother was a very bright > > and unusual building engineer, in the other case, a highly > sensitive > > music therapist. Both got several severely autistic children + one > > child that became a high judge and a highly skilled doctor, > > respectively. The young doctor is a crystal clear Aspie. The judge > > could be, but I'm not sure. > > > > > > I personally suspect the severe autism is due to the Aspling > having > > inherited a dramatically more sensitive nervous system and immune > > system, so that even a very moderate amount of pathogens, > allergens, > > toxins or stress from conception to early childhood is more likely > to > > affect the Aspie baby adversely and cause cognitive and/or > > neurological impairment. > > > > > > Inger > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Parents' marriage choice may > > lead to autism > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:18:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > > mikecarrie01@y... writes: > > > I read another article somewhere that said Silicon Valley is > > becoming > > > a gathering place for Aspies who marry another Aspie with the > > hopes > > > of getting an Aspie child, but that two Aspies create a > > profoundly > > > autistic child. So are they saying two engineers = an Aspie and > > two > > > Aspies = a profoundly autistic child? I'd like to see some > > examples > > > or proof of this. > > > > > > I think all you would have to do is find a chart or report > showing > > the prevalence of autism in Silicon Valley compared to years prior. > > > > > > I don't see any reason why this would not be happening. If Aspies > > are drawn to technical fields and Silicon Valley is a highly > > technical area, then it stands to reason that Aspies would > congregate > > there. It also stands to reason that if AS is a rare trait, like > say > > blue eyes, that if two people with AS marry their children will > have > > a greater likelihood of being AS too, just like having a parent > with > > blue eyes increases the odds of having children with blue eyes. > Also, > > if two mildly autistic people had children, that there is an > > increased chance that their children may be profoundly autistic > could > > also be true for the same reason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, > > support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. > > > > > > Don't forget, there are links to other FAM sites on the Links > page > > in the folder marked " Other FAM Sites. " > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- --- > -- > > ------------ > > > ! GROUPS LINKS > > > > > > a.. Visit your group " " on the web. > > > > > > b.. Quote
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2006 Report Posted February 5, 2006 There are some attorney positions that do not require arguing before a court. An AS attorney would be good at the legal reasearch and legal writing aspects. I use to work for the IRS, working with tax attroneys. Our people very rarely went to court, mostly we gave advice and wrote legal documents. Everyone seems to look down on our agency, but most of the people I worked with were good people. Many attorneys said our agency was more ethical than most private law firms, because we never asked our people to bend our break the law for our behalf. I did not know anything about AS at the time, but looking back I see AS traits in many of the people I worked with. Two of the attorneys were mostly non-verbal, and one of them would always wait till I was away from my desk before leaving work for me. The head of our front office was disliked by many - she didn't smile, she did not have a pleasant voice, and she was very detail oriented (concidered to micro-mange by some), but she also had a toy train set up and some oversized stuffed animals in her office, overall this seems to suggest an aspie personality. There was another lady who was single and lived with lots of cats and often made remarks that seemed a bit rude (such as " is that your real hair? " ). There were a couple of employees who did things that could have been called stimming - one rocked back and forth in his chair almost constantly and one liked to drum his pencil on the desk. In general such aspie traits as low " social skills " and HSP were fairly common. And of course D.C. is almost notorious for the lack of fashion of it's government employees (people make jokes about it). Ilah > > > > > > Actually, as much as your logic makes sense, I have seen examples > > of 2 Aspies getting EITHER AS children or severely autistic > children, > > or a few of each. In one of the cases, the mother was a very bright > > and unusual building engineer, in the other case, a highly > sensitive > > music therapist. Both got several severely autistic children + one > > child that became a high judge and a highly skilled doctor, > > respectively. The young doctor is a crystal clear Aspie. The judge > > could be, but I'm not sure. > > > > > > I personally suspect the severe autism is due to the Aspling > having > > inherited a dramatically more sensitive nervous system and immune > > system, so that even a very moderate amount of pathogens, > allergens, > > toxins or stress from conception to early childhood is more likely > to > > affect the Aspie baby adversely and cause cognitive and/or > > neurological impairment. > > > > > > Inger > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Parents' marriage choice may > > lead to autism > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 1/30/2006 3:18:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > > mikecarrie01@y... writes: > > > I read another article somewhere that said Silicon Valley is > > becoming > > > a gathering place for Aspies who marry another Aspie with the > > hopes > > > of getting an Aspie child, but that two Aspies create a > > profoundly > > > autistic child. So are they saying two engineers = an Aspie and > > two > > > Aspies = a profoundly autistic child? I'd like to see some > > examples > > > or proof of this. > > > > > > I think all you would have to do is find a chart or report > showing > > the prevalence of autism in Silicon Valley compared to years prior. > > > > > > I don't see any reason why this would not be happening. If Aspies > > are drawn to technical fields and Silicon Valley is a highly > > technical area, then it stands to reason that Aspies would > congregate > > there. It also stands to reason that if AS is a rare trait, like > say > > blue eyes, that if two people with AS marry their children will > have > > a greater likelihood of being AS too, just like having a parent > with > > blue eyes increases the odds of having children with blue eyes. > Also, > > if two mildly autistic people had children, that there is an > > increased chance that their children may be profoundly autistic > could > > also be true for the same reason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, > > support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. > > > > > > Don't forget, there are links to other FAM sites on the Links > page > > in the folder marked " Other FAM Sites. " > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- --- > -- > > ------------ > > > ! GROUPS LINKS > > > > > > a.. Visit your group " " on the web. > > > > > > b.. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.