Guest guest Posted October 1, 2004 Report Share Posted October 1, 2004 I wanted to say hi to all the new members and welcome you. We've got a great group of parents here with a wide range of PID's (Primary Immune Deficiency). My daughter is Macey and she's 9 and has CVID, my husband is Les, he's also got CVID and then we have who is going to be 12 next month and just putting up with us all. Macey was diagnosed at 2 1/2 and has been on IVIG pretty much since (with one break off to retest her antibody function). She started out doing IVIG for the first 7 years and has recently switched to a subcutaneous method. It's going great and this weekend will be the first time we do it on the road (going to a wedding in another city and staying in a hotel). PID diagnosis is not the easiest to pin down, might and might not be lifelong and sure is its own beast of burden. My thoughts on are that at any point anyone can get better. Some docs think that it might be transient if the child is under 5 yrs old. Supposedly that's when the body's immune system " fully matures " . Then some docs also think that it might start functioning around puberty. Something about the hormones being released " jump-starting " the immune system. But I believe we have some PID families that start dealing with PID at puberty so it might wreck it too. Since my husband has CVID and we're pretty sure his mom has it (but she won't be tested) then we're kindof resigned to the fact that Macey might have this for the rest of her life. But I won't let any doctor tell her that and I sure won't take it to heart. There is a wealth of knowledge in the group archives so go there and look at the subject lines and read up. I want to remind new and old about one or two things. 1. Please sign all posts. It helps to read better, plus include your childs name and any PID possible or confirmed diagnosis. 2. If you're heading in a new direction with a reply to a post then change the subject line. It makes it easier to read the digest and the archives. Plus it makes the " search " function in the archives worthwhile. Love from Georgia, Ursula Holleman mom to (11 yrs old) and Macey (9 yr. old with CVID, Diabetes Insipidus, colonic inertia) http://members.cox.net/maceyh Immune Deficiency Foundation - Peer Contact for GA http://www.primaryimmune.org IDF Patient/Family Handbook http://www.primaryimmune.org/pubs/book_pats/book_pats.htm / Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2004 Report Share Posted October 2, 2004 Ursula, It is perfectly fine to sign anyway you want to. We all have ways of coping with the issues we deal with and if it helps to not sign there name and condition all the time it makes perfect sense and good for you!! Pam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2004 Report Share Posted October 3, 2004 In a message dated 10/1/2004 8:40:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, SNAKpackmomma@... writes: Our children are certainly not their diagnosis, I view the siggy more along the lines of an introduction, kind of a " this is who we are " thing. I don't like writing it down all the time either, I use the signature set up on my email (I'm sure yours has one too) that automatically puts the siggy on the bottom of my emails. I have different siggy's set up, one for groups such as this one, and then one for family and friends etc. It's easy to do. I also view it this way. And I use the auto siggy. Hope this helps you. Janet, mom to Brittany, CVID, age 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2004 Report Share Posted October 4, 2004 I kind of like that people put the diagnosis on the signature because, being new, it lets me know if that person's child has the same diagnosis as mine and if I have questions or specific to my or my child's experience with treatment, etc., I know who in the group might have suggestions or information for me with regard to that particular immunodeficiency. Of course we know our kids aren't defined by their disease, that is part of what everyone here, I would think, struggles with -- to have their kids get help so they can live life as much like other kids as possible, and be a kid and be seen as a human being instead of just another number on a medical insurance sheet or a list of lab results, etc. And of course if people don't want to give their child's name and age and diagnosis that is their choice, and for many reasons, some of which (for me at least) have nothing to do with whether the child is ill or not. This is an internet group and although everyone here you never know who's gathering or reading information, I would hate my child's business to be " out there " for a sick person to perhaps take advantage of, which is why I don't put up photos, names or too many specifics online about my child. It is parental discretion and I respect it, even when I don't agree or fully understand, I feel have to respect people's choices about their kids and their families. That is what I'd like people to do for me. (Of course if it is really a clear situation where a kid is being hurt or endangered that might be different but in my personal opinion a few medical terms on a signature line qualifies.) At the same time, I am not going to push someone to START or to STOP putting those designators on their signature lines just 'cause I do, or don't, choose to do things that way. I have had too many situations already where people question my love for my child, my parenting, etc. vis a vis my child's illness and so I am not going to tell (or imply towards) anyone that it is ethical or unethical, correct or incorrect, good approach or bad approach to put their child's diagnosis or other information on their posts. My ethics aren't the only or necessarily the best ethics out there, they are just mine, so I don't like to make others feel they might have to defend decisions that they make about how they get the suppport they need to be there for their children. I am here to get and to give support and information not pass judgment on whether parents are thinking in " proper " or " improper " contexts about their child(ren)'s illness(es). I often sarcastically comment that no one listens to me at the doctor's office when I mention what works for my child because I am not a doctor. Well I am not a psychiatrist either and I feel I go into some dangerous waters when I try to analyze other people's motives or decisions (especially people I don't know except from some words on a screen), or when I confuse giving support and sharing my experience and resources with playing doctor to someone else's kid with giving unlicensed medical advice to someone on a child I have never even had a 5 minute face-to-face chat with. I hope no one is offended by what I've posted. I think the question about the signature lines was a good question and I'm new here and that is just my 2 cents. I also know that as people go through their different experiences, opinions and viewpoints change, so perhaps a year from now I will have a whole different 2 cents on this question. /Dayann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.