Post #s and other stuff: Re: Dr Amy Yasko virus explanation

[Guest guest]

I'm glad a few people found my thoughts on this helpful, or at least

people were kind enough to say that :-) even if it might not be true.

As promised, here are a few of the post numbers from

/ that people

might find helpful.

# 91906, 91931, 92078, and 91647

What I found most interesting about the information posted was

about enveloped VS unenveloped (or nonenveloped) viruses, and how VS

seems to be able to work against both. This is particularly

interesting because nonenveloped viruses are apparently very hardy,

can live in bad conditions quite well for longer periods than

enveloped viruses. sackie virus is an example. This makes me

think that, at least for some of our kids, nonenveloped viruses might

be a part of the problem (that is, they could be exposed to these

quite easily, particularly if exposure was after their initial

regression, when the immune system was already compromised).

In one of the posts is the link to 's write-up on her study of

VS. This should be required reading for anyone considering using VS--

extrememly helpful.

Also, I wanted to mention about the measles virus. I did a high dose

vitamin A protocol on my son with no effect. He has had enough

Vitamin A poured into him over the last year to last 10 lifetimes but

he still had very pronounced peripheral/stimming issues and extremely

poor eye contact. We're using lauricidin, VS, OLE, and Sambucol.

Lauricidin works on the measles virus. VS would also work on the

measles virus envelope. In the last few days, we've seen a marked

improvement in my son's eye contact. We've been on the antiviral

protocol for about 5 weeks. My son had his MMR very shortly after a

truly brutal case of chicken pox. Both the measles and chicken pox

viruses deplete Vitamin A but it would seem, at least for my son, that

restoring vitamin A levels was not possible without first dealing with

the viruses themselves.

Anita