Guest guest Posted October 1, 2004 Report Share Posted October 1, 2004 Greetings to all! My neighbor is running for state sentate and sent me the information below, asking what my take is on this. It is for a Candidate form and I would like him to have some good input on this. Who he's running against doesn't vote on A LOT of things and needs to be out of office. Thanks, Michele Disability Questions For Cobb Candidate Forum 1. Currently there are more than 5,180 Georgians who have disabilities that have been placed on waiting lists for home and community-based services. They are waiting for help that includes respite, supported employment, housing supports, and family supports. How would you support these 5,180 Georgians with disabilities who qualify for Medicaid to be able to live safely in the community? Georgians with significant disabilities need essential services to remain with their families and in their communities. Services have not been adequately funded by the state, and families are placed on waiting lists. The Department of Human Resources and the Department of Community Health keep lists with the names of those people who have asked for help. They represent young children, young and middle aged adults, and older people with mental retardation, severe physical disabilities, and those who are medically fragile. These lists continue to grow yearly with the addition of over 500 high school students who transition out of the school system. The Unlock the Waiting List campaign is a targeted effort by disability organizations to educate the public and advocate for additional funding to make services available to those most in need. 2. In addition to the 5,180 individuals in the community waiting for help, there are currently over 5,000 individuals with disabilities living in hospitals and nursing homes throughout Georgia. Given the recent Olmstead Supreme Court case decision, what are some solutions that you could bring to the General Assembly to support people's ability to prevent unneeded institutionalization, but rather to promote their choice to live in their own communities? The United States Supreme Court issued the Olmstead v. L.C. decision on June 22, 1999 holding that unnecessary segregation of individuals in institutions may constitute discrimination based on disability. The Olmstead v. L.C. case involved two Georgia citizens with disabilities residing in a state institution, and it held that " undue institutionalization qualifies as discrimination " under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The decision suggested that a state could establish compliance with ADA if it demonstrated that it has a comprehensive, effectively working plan for placing eligible persons with disabilities in less restrictive settings, and a waiting list that moves at a reasonable pace given the resources available and not controlled by trying to keep the State's institutions fully populated. 3. The most important paid staff in the lives of people with disabilities are their direct support staff or personal assistants. Personal assistance support people with their basic activities of daily living and work responsibilities. Low wages for direct support staff lead to high staff turnover, resulting in interruptions in relationships and continuity of support, seriously impacting the quality of life for the person with a disability and his or her family. Developmental disability providers have not received a rate increase in over a decade. How would you support an annual cost-of-living increase to the provider rate? Since the 1970's community-based providers in Georgia have supported people with developmental disabilities from residential to respite and from job skills to competitive employment. In the late 1980's Georgia implemented the Medicaid Waiver (MRWP – Mental Retardation Waiver Program) to serve individuals and in the late 1990's added the CHSS or Community Habilitation and Support Services Waiver. Both waivers have had only one rate increase (4% in FY 2002) over the last 12 years. For the past decade NO other industry (public, private, state or local government) has gone without rate or price increase. 4. The Department of Community Health has proposed making cuts to the Beckett Waiver program by adding a premium for families to access these supports. How do you feel this change will impact the special needs children using this program, and what priority should they be given in the state's budget due to their age and medical need for service? Families who are eligible for the Beckett Waiver have a child or children who qualify for institutional level of care due to complex medical needs or disability. Their income is too high for them to qualify for Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Therefore, they make too much money to qualify for Medicaid coverage, but not enough to cover the extraordinary expenses that result from having a special needs child. The Beckett Waiver covers services and supports that are not covered by private insurance, and enables families to receive this coverage without reducing their income to a point where it is impossible to provide for other children, or for their own support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.