Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: OT: Justice

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

just about 100% bunk

Sincerely yours,

Dominic M. Pedulla MD, FACC, CNFPMC, ABVM, ACPh

Interventional Cardiologist, Endovascular Diplomate, Varicose Vein Specialist, Noncontraceptive Family Planning Consultant, Family Planning Researcher

Medical Director, The Oklahoma Vein and Endovascular Center (www.noveinok.com, veininfo@...)

Executive Director, The Edith Stein Foundation (www.theedithsteinfoundation.com)

405-947-2228 (office)

405-834-7506 (cell)

405-947-2307 (FAX)

pedullad@...

"...the priestly ministry is not just a pastoral service; it ensures the continuity of the functions entrusted by Christ to the Apostles and the continuity of the powers related to those functions. Adaptation to civilizations and times therefore cannot abolish, on essential points, the sacramental reference to constitutive events of Christianity and to Christ himself." (Inter Insignores)

OT: Justice

Why Chief Justice Made the Right

Long-Term Decision With ObamaCare

Bert Atkinson Jr. June 28, 2012 3:59 pm

Before you look to do harm to Chief Justice or his family,

it’s important that you think carefully about the meaning – the

true nature — of his ruling on Obama-care. The Left will shout that they

won, that Obama-care was upheld and all the rest. Let them.

It will be a short-lived celebration.

Here’s what really occurred — payback. Yes, payback

for Obama’s numerous, ill-advised and childish insults directed toward

SCOTUS.

Chief Justice actually ruled the mandate, relative to the

commerce clause, was unconstitutional. That’s how the Democrats got

Obama-care going in the first place. This is critical. His ruling means

Congress can’t compel American citizens to purchase anything. Ever. The

notion is now officially and forever, unconstitutional. As it should be.

Next, he stated that, because Congress doesn’t have the

ability to mandate, it must, to fund Obama-care, rely on its power to tax.

Therefore, the mechanism that funds Obama-care is a tax. This is also critical.

Recall back during the initial Obama-care battles, the Democrats called it a

penalty, Republicans called it a tax. Democrats consistently soft sold it as a

penalty. It went to vote as a penalty. Obama declared endlessly, that it was

not a tax, it was a penalty. But when the Democrats argued in front of the

Supreme Court, they said ‘hey, a penalty or a tax, either way’. So,

gave them a tax. It is now the official law of the land — beyond

word-play and silly shenanigans. Obama-care is funded by tax dollars. Democrats

now must defend a tax increase to justify the Obama-care law.

Finally, he struck down as unconstitutional, the Obama-care idea

that the federal government can bully states into complying by yanking their

existing medicaid funding. Liberals, through Obama-care, basically said to the

states — ‘comply with Obama-care or we will stop existing

funding.’ ruled that is a no-no. If a state takes the money,

fine, the Feds can tell the state how to run a program, but if the state

refuses money, the federal government can’t penalize the state by yanking

other funding. Therefore, a state can decline to participate in Obama-care

without penalty. This is obviously a serious problem. Are we going to have 10,

12, 25 states not participating in “national†health-care? Suddenly,

it’s not national, is it?

Ultimately, supported states rights by limiting the

federal government’s coercive abilities. He ruled that the government can

not force the people to purchase products or services under the commerce clause

and he forced liberals to have to come clean and admit that Obama-care is

funded by tax increases.

Although he didn’t guarantee Romney a win, he certainly did

more than his part and should be applauded.

And he did this without creating a civil war or having bricks thrown

threw his windshield. Oh, and he’ll be home in time for dinner.

Brilliant.

SHARE this interesting piece with your friends by clicking the

buttons below!

This article, written by I.M. Citizen, gives a much different

perspective of Justice ’s decision. Comment below and let us know

what you think. Also check out I.M. Citizen’s blog -

quite interesting.

=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...