To each his own but I don't agree.

[Guest guest]

>

> If it were not for the brave people in this group experimenting like this

> others would never know what works and what doesn't. You should thank these

> people for being the pioneers that they are. Better to experiment on

> yourself than on animals, IMO.

>

>

I absolutely LOVE and adore animals but if my FRIEND were doing this, this is

what I would

tell them. I don't want anyone risking their health for me. If this were an

herb, a plant, a

food or something like that I wouldn't comment, but a chemical - in it's true

form is

different. I don't want anyone damaging their nose or their eyes so I can learn

anything

ESPECIALLY when it's already been determined to work by the way it's been

described by

Jim. It has clearly been demonstrated that it works internally with a certain

protocol. It

has already been demonstrated that it works a particular, safe way on the skin.

WHY WHY

WHY not just take as directed since it's already been working via Jim's

protocol?

If, when grapefruit seed extract first came out - and I was one of the first to

buy it - I put

it in my eyes or my nose- straight out of the bottle, despite how it was

instructed for use

to get results, I would have PERMANENTLY damaged my nasal passages. I did take

it

internally as directed in a higher dose but there were no warnings through the

company

that indicated that would be damaging. That was pioneering but that wasn't

ill-informed

or as risky as what is being done here.

[Guest guest]

BTW, I have used grapefruit seed extract in my ears for an ear infection and it worked great!--

-- [ ] To each his own but I don't agree.

>

> If it were not for the brave people in this group experimenting like this

> others would never know what works and what doesn't. You should thank these

> people for being the pioneers that they are. Better to experiment on

> yourself than on animals, IMO.

>

>

I absolutely LOVE and adore animals but if my FRIEND were doing this, this is what I would

tell them. I don't want anyone risking their health for me. If this were an herb, a plant, a

food or something like that I wouldn't comment, but a chemical - in it's true form is

different. I don't want anyone damaging their nose or their eyes so I can learn anything

ESPECIALLY when it's already been determined to work by the way it's been described by

Jim. It has clearly been demonstrated that it works internally with a certain protocol. It

has already been demonstrated that it works a particular, safe way on the skin. WHY WHY

WHY not just take as directed since it's already been working via Jim's protocol?

If, when grapefruit seed extract first came out - and I was one of the first to buy it - I put

it in my eyes or my nose- straight out of the bottle, despite how it was instructed for use

to get results, I would have PERMANENTLY damaged my nasal passages. I did take it

internally as directed in a higher dose but there were no warnings through the company

that indicated that would be damaging. That was pioneering but that wasn't ill-informed

or as risky as what is being done here.

------------------------------------