Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will never see office, unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All the republicans need is one really good candidate (which I don't think they have). It seems like all the Dems have is clinton and Obama... neither of which stand much chance in the conservative south. > > If Clinton gets in you can bet the DSS/CPS will be removing > every kid from parents wou refuse vaccines. There will be more psych > drugs being forced down their throats. The only candidate to clean up > this mess is Ron . > > Peggy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 , Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in the polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is trying very hard to keep this quiet. Peggy > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will never see office, > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All the republicans need is one > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Ron is the only candidate who is for legitimate health freedom and open govt. He's my guy, and those of you with vaccine damaged kids should consider supporting him also. www.ronpaul2008.com Americans are justifiably concerned over the government's escalating intervention into their freedom to choose what they eat and how they take care of their health. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in order to comply with standards dictated by supra-national organizations such as the UN`s World Food Code (CODEX), NAFTA, and CAFTA, has been assuming greater control over nutrients, vitamins and natural health care providers to restrict your right to choose the manner in which you manage your health and nutritional needs. I have been the national leader in preserving Health Freedom. I have introduced the Health Freedom Protection Act, HR 2117, to ensure Americans can receive truthful health information about supplements and natural remedies. I support the Access to Medical Treatment Act, H.R. 2717, which expands the ability of Americans to use alternative medicine and new treatments. I oppose legislation that increases the FDA`s legal powers. FDA has consistently failed to protect the public from dangerous drugs, genetically modified foods, dangerous pesticides and other chemicals in the food supply. Meanwhile they waste public funds attacking safe, healthy foods and dietary supplements I also opposed the Homeland Security Bill, H.R. 5005, which, in section 304, authorizes the forced vaccination of American citizens against small pox. The government should never have the power to require immunizations or vaccinations. > > , > > Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in the > polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is trying > very hard to keep this quiet. > > Peggy > > > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will never see > office, > > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All the > republicans need is one > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 I'm not sure if really has a shot, but I look forward to seeing him liven up the debates if he isn't banished from them. > > > > , > > > > Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in the > > polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is trying > > very hard to keep this quiet. > > > > Peggy > > > > > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will never > see > > office, > > > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All the > > republicans need is one > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 I sincerely hope we can be spared partisan bickering on this list, but I do have a couple of comments: - Ron is definitely the dark horse in this race, so I wouldn't count him out, and I'm always glad for any candidate who has the courage to look at issues with a fresh and honest perspective - I don't think any mainstream candidate can afford to go up against the AMA, insurance companies, pharma interests, and the public health establishment, but I was at least encouraged to see that H Clinton *acknowledge* the size of the problem. The number she's throwing around is not what will happen. It will be much more or much less. - Our job should be to get more candidates to recognize that this is an enormous public health problem, and to promise that they'll give it more than token attention once they're in office. On 11/26/07, anacat_11 <anacat_11@...> wrote: > I'm not sure if really has a shot, but I look forward to seeing > him liven up the debates if he isn't banished from them. > > > > > > > > , > > > > > > Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in > the > > > polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is > trying > > > very hard to keep this quiet. > > > > > > Peggy > > > > > > > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will > never > > see > > > office, > > > > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All > the > > > republicans need is one > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Leif Knutsen (also responds to vyerllc@... and leif@...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 I like Ron , but if you're going to vote for him you should be aware of some of his viewpoints. He does vote " from the pulpit, " which is fine for most of the anti-vaccine folk as he will definitely work to keep the religious exemption around for a while. Wikipedia has a post on him that is linked below that will give more details. He is pro-life, but also believes in state's rights so would leave the decision on abortion to each state individually. (a paraphrase of his own words, not mine.) He is at least opposed to Big Pharma and corporate subsidies, which resonates with my own libertarian leanings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_ Ray > > > > > > > > , > > > > > > > > Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in > > the > > > > polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is > > trying > > > > very hard to keep this quiet. > > > > > > > > Peggy > > > > > > > > > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will > > never > > > see > > > > office, > > > > > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All > > the > > > > republicans need is one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Leif Knutsen > (also responds to vyerllc@... and leif@...) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 They will ALL have to acknowledge the size of the problem! I usually vote democratic but never in a million years will vote for Clinton after all I've seen of her in the last few years. Ron is the only hope and all need to rally round him instead of worrying their vote will be thrown away I hope he survives Sheri At 09:32 AM 11/26/2007 -0500, you wrote: >I sincerely hope we can be spared partisan bickering on this list, but >I do have a couple of comments: > >- Ron is definitely the dark horse in this race, so I wouldn't >count him out, and I'm always glad for any candidate who has the >courage to look at issues with a fresh and honest perspective >- I don't think any mainstream candidate can afford to go up against >the AMA, insurance companies, pharma interests, and the public health >establishment, but I was at least encouraged to see that H Clinton >*acknowledge* the size of the problem. The number she's throwing >around is not what will happen. It will be much more or much less. >- Our job should be to get more candidates to recognize that this is >an enormous public health problem, and to promise that they'll give it >more than token attention once they're in office. > >On 11/26/07, anacat_11 <anacat_11@...> wrote: >> I'm not sure if really has a shot, but I look forward to seeing >> him liven up the debates if he isn't banished from them. >> >> >> > > >> > > , >> > > >> > > Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in >> the >> > > polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is >> trying >> > > very hard to keep this quiet. >> > > >> > > Peggy >> > > >> > > > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will >> never >> > see >> > > office, >> > > > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All >> the >> > > republicans need is one >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >-- >Leif Knutsen >(also responds to vyerllc@... and leif@...) > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 I heard he was running with a third party... libertarian? > > , > > Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in the > polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is trying > very hard to keep this quiet. > > Peggy > > > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will never see > office, > > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All the > republicans need is one > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 Ron is a Libertarian regardless of what he calls himself. I'm all for voting who you believe in and not trying to pick a potential winner, but Ron getting the Republican nomination is complete fantasy. Go ahead and vote for him, but place your " hope " elsewhere. > > > > , > > > > Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in the > > polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is trying > > very hard to keep this quiet. > > > > Peggy > > > > > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will never see > > office, > > > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All the > > republicans need is one > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 26, 2007 Report Share Posted November 26, 2007 If Ron would have a different stance regarding war I think he'd be the no 1 candidate. That's gonna keep him from getting it. JMHO, Debi > > I'm not sure if really has a shot, but I look forward to seeing > him liven up the debates if he isn't banished from them. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2007 Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 The problem is there is no hope. Not with either the dems, or the republicans. I have thought in the past Ron was a bit radical. We are at the point in this country that only radical change will make a difference. He is also for personal choice in medicine. That means no forced vacccine mandates. Compared to all the other candidates he is the only one that will bring any real change. > > > > > > , > > > > > > Ron is running on the Rebulican ticket. He is gaining in the > > > polls, and raising phenominal amounts of money. The media is > trying > > > very hard to keep this quiet. > > > > > > Peggy > > > > > > > Then we have no candidate to clean this mess. Ron will > never see > > > office, > > > > unfortunately...unless he ran on the republican ticket. All the > > > republicans need is one > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2007 Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 Debi, Its his stance on the war that is pushing him up in the polls. He is also the candidiate that the military families are behind. > > > > I'm not sure if really has a shot, but I look forward to seeing > > him liven up the debates if he isn't banished from them. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 27, 2007 Report Share Posted November 27, 2007 I think that's questionable. I can't speak for military families, I'm not from one but the military families I do know are not supporting . I think a lot of his ideas, other than war, would be very marketable to the majority of Republican voters but his views about war are very unpopular with the majority of Republicans. By majority I mean more than 50%. He's no where near that high in polls. Of course, polls are known to be wrong. BTW, I got a call for a poll the other day. She asked, " What do you consider the no 1 issue in America today " then rattled off several issues. I said, " None of them, autism is the no 1 issue. " She was stumped for a minute, then listed it, then told me her mother, who is a sped teacher, would certainly agree with me. Debi > > Debi, > Its his stance on the war that is pushing him up in the polls. He is > also the candidiate that the military families are behind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.