NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007

[Guest guest]

I don't know what that means, exactly--'over the top'.

It's not a bad thing is it?

--- Re: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:19:32 -0400

She did look uncomfortable. Maybe she doesn’t like public

speaking- who knows?

Honestly, it didn’t matter to me what she said. Anything she

had to say won’t help my son.

We’ve got 2 hearings in Suffolk Co this week about thimerosal in

vaccines, I’ve got a luncheon

with Gov. Spitzer’s wife on Friday, we might have to reschedule my

son’s chelation appt. this week,

I’ve got to get 200 packets out for the LIAC tomorrow (got 40 done

so far)------ my priority is not what thinks.

And the more we obsess over her- the more importance her comments get.

Yes- I know she speaks for AS.

But when my son recovers it’s not going to be because of AS or

NAAR.

Again- the videos will get done when I can get them done. Not mad

at you Sally. Just have a lot to do....On 3/11/07 7:09 PM, "S Colletti" <rainmanmama > wrote:

,

Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there

was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she

read her testimony, which she was asked not to do before she got up

there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit

balls at

her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention

at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with

this in her written testimony:

"With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become

the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the

appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to

know what interventions are likely to work with students with

specific profiles.

Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed

right towards the biomed treatment!!! *******"The opportunists that

are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these

families' "hopes" for quick answers or cures."******

My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children.

As

Imus said, have a backbone here! Again, it's not in

particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable

being there. It's AS as a whole.

[Guest guest]

Robin, IMO, you're over the top is good. Love the photo also. MaurineRobin@... wrote: I don't know what that means, exactly--'over the top'. It's not a bad thing is it? --- Re: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:19:32 -0400 She did look uncomfortable. Maybe she doesn’t like public speaking- who knows?Honestly, it didn’t matter to me what she said. Anything she had to say won’t help my son.We’ve got 2 hearings in Suffolk Co this week about thimerosal in vaccines, I’ve got a

luncheonwith Gov. Spitzer’s wife on Friday, we might have to reschedule my son’s chelation appt. this week,I’ve got to get 200 packets out for the LIAC tomorrow (got 40 done so far)------ my priority is not what thinks.And the more we obsess over her- the more importance her comments get. Yes- I know she speaks for AS.But when my son recovers it’s not going to be because of AS or NAAR.Again- the videos will get done when I can get them done. Not mad at you Sally. Just have a lot to do....On 3/11/07 7:09 PM, "S Colletti" <rainmanmama > wrote: , Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she read her testimony, which she

was asked not to do before she got up there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit balls at her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with this in her written testimony:"With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely to work with students with specific profiles. Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed right towards the biomed treatment!!! *******"The opportunists that are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' "hopes" for quick answers or cures."******My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children. As Imus said, have a

backbone here! Again, it's not in particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable being there. It's AS as a whole.

Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Search weather shortcut.

[Guest guest]

Robin, IMO, you're over the top is good. Love the photo also. MaurineRobin@... wrote: I don't know what that means, exactly--'over the top'. It's not a bad thing is it? --- Re: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:19:32 -0400 She did look uncomfortable. Maybe she doesn’t like public speaking- who knows?Honestly, it didn’t matter to me what she said. Anything she had to say won’t help my son.We’ve got 2 hearings in Suffolk Co this week about thimerosal in vaccines, I’ve got a

luncheonwith Gov. Spitzer’s wife on Friday, we might have to reschedule my son’s chelation appt. this week,I’ve got to get 200 packets out for the LIAC tomorrow (got 40 done so far)------ my priority is not what thinks.And the more we obsess over her- the more importance her comments get. Yes- I know she speaks for AS.But when my son recovers it’s not going to be because of AS or NAAR.Again- the videos will get done when I can get them done. Not mad at you Sally. Just have a lot to do....On 3/11/07 7:09 PM, "S Colletti" <rainmanmama > wrote: , Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she read her testimony, which she

was asked not to do before she got up there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit balls at her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with this in her written testimony:"With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely to work with students with specific profiles. Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed right towards the biomed treatment!!! *******"The opportunists that are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' "hopes" for quick answers or cures."******My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children. As Imus said, have a

backbone here! Again, it's not in particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable being there. It's AS as a whole.

Don't get soaked. Take a quick peek at the forecast with the Search weather shortcut.

[Guest guest]

"Over the top" means you went a little farther in your letter to Alison than I would have. I agree with you that the focus of AS needs to be changed, I would not have attacked her personally for having different view points than we do. I don't make the leap that she is helping the govt agencies and Pharma maintain the coverup. I think Pharma and govt agencies don't need her help, they are doing a great job on coverup all by themselves. AS is operating in the mainstream and is afraid to open the organization up to alternative because they are protecting their credibility. I understand your anger, I have my moments too, believe me. The goal would be to make our position so credible that AS HAS to open up to this model of autism.

Heidi

From: Robin@...Reply-EOHarm To: EOHarm Subject: RE: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:04:26 -0700

I don't know what that means, exactly--'over the top'.

It's not a bad thing is it?

--- Re: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:19:32 -0400

She did look uncomfortable. Maybe she doesn’t like public speaking- who knows?Honestly, it didn’t matter to me what she said. Anything she had to say won’t help my son.We’ve got 2 hearings in Suffolk Co this week about thimerosal in vaccines, I’ve got a luncheonwith Gov. Spitzer’s wife on Friday, we might have to reschedule my son’s chelation appt. this week,I’ve got to get 200 packets out for the LIAC tomorrow (got 40 done so far)------ my priority is not what thinks.And the more we obsess over her- the more importance her comments get. Yes- I know she speaks for AS.But when my son recovers it’s not going to be because of AS or NAAR.Again- the videos will get done when I can get them done. Not mad at you Sally. Just have a lot to do....On 3/11/07 7:09 PM, "S Colletti" <rainmanmama > wrote:

, Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she read her testimony, which she was asked not to do before she got up there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit balls at her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with this in her written testimony:"With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely to work with students with specific profiles. Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed right towards the biomed treatment!!! *******"The opportunists that are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' "hopes" for quick answers or cures."******My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children. As Imus said, have a backbone here! Again, it's not in particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable being there. It's AS as a whole.

[Guest guest]

Sometimes it is hard to distinguish….is

that the CDC talking or Autism Speaks talking….they all must attend the

same PR trainings.

From: EOHarm [mailto:EOHarm ] On Behalf Of elevatordance

Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 12:09

PM

EOHarm

Subject: RE: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007

" Over

the top " means you went a little farther in your letter to Alison

than I would have. I agree with you that the focus of AS needs to

be changed, I would not have attacked her personally for having different

view points than we do. I don't make the leap that she is helping the

govt agencies and Pharma maintain the coverup. I think Pharma and govt

agencies don't need her help, they are doing a great job on coverup all by

themselves. AS is operating in the mainstream and is afraid to open

the organization up to alternative because they are protecting their

credibility. I understand your anger, I have my moments too, believe

me. The goal would be to make our position so credible that AS HAS to

open up to this model of autism.

Heidi

From: RobinNemeths (DOT) info

Reply-EOHarm

EOHarm

Subject: RE: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:04:26 -0700

I don't know what that means, exactly--'over the top'.

It's not a bad thing is it?

--- Re: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007

Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:19:32 -0400

She did look uncomfortable.

Maybe she doesn’t like public speaking- who knows?

Honestly, it didn’t matter to me what she said. Anything she had to

say won’t help my son.

We’ve got 2 hearings in Suffolk Co this week about thimerosal in

vaccines, I’ve got a luncheon

with Gov. Spitzer’s wife on Friday, we might have to reschedule my

son’s chelation appt. this week,

I’ve got to get 200 packets out for the LIAC tomorrow (got 40 done so

far)------ my priority is not what thinks.

And the more we obsess over her- the more importance her comments get.

Yes- I know she speaks for AS.

But when my son recovers it’s not going to be because of AS or NAAR.

Again- the videos will get done when I can get them done. Not mad at you

Sally. Just have a lot to do....

On 3/11/07 7:09 PM, " S Colletti "

<rainmanmama > wrote:

,

Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there

was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she

read her testimony, which she was asked not to do before she got up

there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit balls

at

her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention

at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with

this in her written testimony:

" With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become

the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the

appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to

know what interventions are likely to work with students with

specific profiles.

Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed

right towards the biomed treatment!!! ******* " The opportunists that

are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these

families' " hopes " for quick answers or cures. " ******

My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children. As

Imus said, have a backbone here! Again, it's not in

particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable

being there. It's AS as a whole.

[Guest guest]

I used to love Charlie McCarthy and Edgar Bergin.

Don't in its present form.

Re: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:19:32 -0400

She did look uncomfortable. Maybe she doesn’t like public speaking- who knows?Honestly, it didn’t matter to me what she said. Anything she had to say won’t help my son.We’ve got 2 hearings in Suffolk Co this week about thimerosal in vaccines, I’ve got a luncheonwith Gov. Spitzer’s wife on Friday, we might have to reschedule my son’s chelation appt. this week,I’ve got to get 200 packets out for the LIAC tomorrow (got 40 done so far)------ my priority is not what thinks.And the more we obsess over her- the more importance her comments get. Yes- I know she speaks for AS.But when my son recovers it’s not going to be because of AS or NAAR.Again- the videos will get done when I can get them done. Not mad at you Sally. Just have a lot to do....On 3/11/07 7:09 PM, "S Colletti" <rainmanmama > wrote:

, Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she read her testimony, which she was asked not to do before she got up there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit balls at her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with this in her written testimony:"With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely to work with students with specific profiles. Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed right towards the biomed treatment!!! *******"The opportunists that are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' "hopes" for quick answers or cures."******My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children. As Imus said, have a backbone here! Again, it's not in particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable being there. It's AS as a whole.

[Guest guest]

Perhaps it would be most credible for AS to close its doors...

>

>

>

>

>

> ,

> Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the

meantime there

> was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured

after she

> read her testimony, which she was asked not to do before

she got up

> there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit

balls at

> her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any

attention

> at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the

WSJ with

> this in her written testimony:

> " With good marketing strategies, any method or approach

can become

> the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with

the

> appropriation of limited resources and expending public

funds need to

> know what interventions are likely to work with students

with

> specific profiles.

> Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's

directed

> right towards the biomed treatment!!! ******* " The

opportunists that

> are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on

these

> families' " hopes " for quick answers or cures. " ******

>

> My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your

children. As

> Imus said, have a backbone here! Again, it's not

in

> particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright

uncomfortable

> being there. It's AS as a whole.

>

[Guest guest]

They could go on that new show- "Are you smarter than a fifth grader"

A person form AS can explain how prevalent the autism epidemic, but they don't really know its cause and they can then stand there like a friggin' dunce scratching their ass and/or their scalp and then ask the fifth graders what the cause of the autism epidemic is.

All of the fifth graders can then raise their hand at once and shout out the real cause.

It would make for good TV.

Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007

Perhaps it would be most credible for AS to close its doors...> > > > > > , > Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there > was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she > read her testimony, which she was asked not to do before she got up > there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit balls at > her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention > at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with > this in her written testimony:> "With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become > the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the > appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to > know what interventions are likely to work with students with > specific profiles. > Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed > right towards the biomed treatment!!! *******"The opportunists that > are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these > families' "hopes" for quick answers or cures."******> > My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children. As > Imus said, have a backbone here! Again, it's not in > particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable > being there. It's AS as a whole.>

[Guest guest]

Bob, you make an excellent point in questioning Ms. Singers reason for bringing up the CAA, and the evidence based bullshit at a state hearing. I believe it's from fear.

Yes, the war was declared a long time ago, but honestly, from where we sit (my wife and I were drafted into this conflict eight years ago), the AS/CAN types are feeling a lot of heat. In speaking to some of the people I know who are adamant in their defense of the genetic/too much TV/old daddies basis for the epidemic, I sense a cracking of their self assured defenses. I simply challenge them to SHOW ME (I used to live in Missouri and picked up a bad case of their attitude) the toxicology data on the safety of thimerosal and aluminum, and the safety studies on the ridiculous number of vaccines the pediatric Mafia injected into my son. I remind them all the time that selective epidemiology studies do not show the damage done to human brain cells like a microscope does. That usually makes people stop and think.

Let's be honest. The front page autism stories are getting sillier, and a hellova lot less respectable. Putting a stupid theory about kids watching too much TV as the cause for autism on the front page of anything but a supermarket tabloid is a sign of desperation by the fools at CDC and Pharma. Giving an anthropologist/epidemiologist the headline over solid toxicology work by Boyd Haley, or Mike Wagnitz, is pathetic. Our adversaries continue to throw crap against the wall hoping something will stick, while avoiding the reality. If this is all they can throw up against the truth, they are in trouble.

Harry H.

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.

[Guest guest]

AMEN, Harry!

>> Bob, you make an excellent point in questioning Ms. Singers reason for > bringing up the CAA, and the evidence based bullshit at a state hearing. I believe > it's from fear. > > Yes, the war was declared a long time ago, but honestly, from where we sit > (my wife and I were drafted into this conflict eight years ago), the AS/CAN > types are feeling a lot of heat. In speaking to some of the people I know who > are adamant in their defense of the genetic/too much TV/old daddies basis for > the epidemic, I sense a cracking of their self assured defenses. I simply > challenge them to SHOW ME (I used to live in Missouri and picked up a bad case > of their attitude) the toxicology data on the safety of thimerosal and > aluminum, and the safety studies on the ridiculous number of vaccines the pediatric > Mafia injected into my son. I remind them all the time that selective > epidemiology studies do not show the damage done to human brain cells like a > microscope does. That usually makes people stop and think. > > Let's be honest. The front page autism stories are getting sillier, and a > hellova lot less respectable. Putting a stupid theory about kids watching too > much TV as the cause for autism on the front page of anything but a > supermarket tabloid is a sign of desperation by the fools at CDC and Pharma. Giving an > anthropologist/epidemiologist the headline over solid toxicology work by Boyd > Haley, or Mike Wagnitz, is pathetic. Our adversaries continue to throw crap > against the wall hoping something will stick, while avoiding the reality. If > this is all they can throw up against the truth, they are in trouble.> > Harry H.> > > > > > <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free > email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at > http://www.aol.com.>