Guest guest Posted March 11, 2007 Report Share Posted March 11, 2007 What were the comments that evidence a " disconnect " ? On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:10 PM, martinx2us wrote: Below is the testimony of Alison Tepper Singer before The Assembly Standing Committee On Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Development Disabilities and the Senate Standing Committee On Mental Health And Developmental Disabilities on March 8, 2007.  I have seen the many comments related thereto and apparently there seems to be a disconnect on what was said.  On a related note I can add that the school Alison's daughter attends is on the NYS list of approved private schools. Consequently, it is a district paid programs for children who need an out of district placement as a result of the CSE's determination that the needs of the child cannot be served in the local district or BOCES program.  MARCH 8, 2007   TESTIMONY OF ALISON TEPPER SINGER SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT COMMUNICATIONS AND STRATEGY AUTISM SPEAKS  BEFORE  THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES  AND  THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   MARCH 8, 2007            Chairman and Chairman Morahan, thank you for recognizing me and for holding this very important hearing today.           My name is Alison Singer. I am a resident of Westchester County and the Senior Vice President for Communications and Strategy at Autism Speaks. Autism Speaks, the largest single organization devoted to autism in the country, was founded in February 2005 by Bob and Suzanne of New York City who have a grandson affected by this disorder. Over the last two years, we have joined forces with the National Alliance for Autism Research and, very recently, Cure Autism Now. I am here on behalf of tens of thousands of parents and their children who belong to our organization.           I am also here on behalf of Jodie Singer, my nine year-old daughter, who suffers from autism, and Tepper, my 42 year old brother with autism. Jodie truly is the sunshine in my life. She was diagnosed at age 2 ½ and received early intervention services through the New York State Department of Health. She attended a special education preschool and then received special education services in public school. However, her needs simply could not be met by the public school system and she is currently enrolled in a private school for children with autism, where she is making good progress, because there is staff trained to meet her unique learning needs. My brother , a former victim of Willowbrook, is currently living in a group home in Rockland County, where he participates in a day program delivering meals on wheels to home-bound citizens. In the last few years he has learned to swim and became toilet trained in his thirties, proving that it is never too late to offer services to persons with autism across their lifespan.           As you know, Chairmen, my family is not alone in the struggle with autism spectrum disorder. Every twenty minutes, another child is diagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Protection, 1 in 150 children are diagnosed with autism. That means that in every grade in every public school in New York there is likely to be at least one child diagnosed with autism.           Because of this epidemic, Autism Speaks pushed very hard for passage of the Federal Combating Autism Act, which the President signed into law in December. The CAA authorizes nearly one billion dollars to fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. It is our fervent hope that the CAA will help change that, and we urge the New York legislature to act on a companion bill. Given the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in the state, there is no reason that New York should not be a research leader and respond to the huge demand for evidence-based information regarding the education of individuals with autism. We are in desperate need of evidence-based educational treatments. What we have now are collections of consensus-based best practices. But without a research foundation, " best practices " often amount to an exchange of testimonials and fads. With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy.  School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely to work with students with specific profiles. The opportunists that are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' " hopes " for quick answers or cures.  The No Child Left Behind Act and other such legislation require schools to attend to and sufficiently fund programs that will promote academic skills. On the other hand, programs and opportunities that allow for the development of life skills are being reduced. Traditional " shop " programs seen at the high school level, for example, have become " technologized " to the point that an understanding of computer technology and physics is required. Hence, as school districts ratchet up their education programs, young adults with autism and other related disabilities are being further disadvantaged.  Research based programs are needed to help guide school districts in program development and implementation, as well as in program design. Funding needs to be earmarked to help establish centers that will develop basic competencies in those individuals for whom college is not in the future but who have the capability to be functional members in our communities. Such centers need to include career counselors and placement services. Finally, with the number of children with autism rising and more and more of those children being educated in mainstream public school classes, teacher training for all mainstream teachers regarding how to work appropriately with students with autism is necessary.           But funding educational research is just a first step. Please allow me to suggest several other areas that your committees may want to consider:  ·       First, families that are affected by autism need insurance coverage. By and large, insurance companies do not reimburse parents for the diagnosis, treatment, and services associated with spectrum disorders. At Autism Speaks, we do not believe in competition in human misery. But while health plans cover the broken legs and broken arms of healthy kids, they do not cover the costs of treating a child with autism. That's just plain wrong. You have the opportunity to change that by mandating insurance coverage for evidence based treatments of autism.  ·       Second, New York should become a leader in providing services to families who live with autism. One of Autism Speaks' highest priorities in Washington this year will be a follow-on to the Combating Autism Act in the form of a state grant program to fund services and treatment programs. We urge you to get ahead of Congress and pass legislation that will allocate resources to ensure that people suffering from ASD can be meaningful members of their communities.  ·       Third, although not necessarily in the purview of your committees, we strongly recommend revisions to the tax code that would benefit families with autistic children. Mothers and fathers will not be around forever, and without a cure, autism will stay with someone for life. We can use the tax laws to fund pre-tax accounts that allow parents to provide for their kids, just as mothers and fathers can save for college educations.  ·       Finally, there is great concern among families of children with autism that New York State Ed's interpretation of the Individuals with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA) will mean that children whose school districts cannot provide appropriate placements within the district and who have to attend school outside of their home district will no longer be the responsibility of the school district in which their parents reside and pay taxes, but rather the school district in which the new school the child attends is physically located. For example, if I live in Scarsdale and my daughter attends an autism program at a school in Eastchester, responsibility for reviewing her annual progress and evaluating her ongoing needs is transferred to Eastchester, which may or may not decide that Eastchester is even appropriate. While I understand that this provision was implemented as part of the Child Find program, it will have devastating consequences for families and children, and will result in decreased accountability for the education of the most fragile of children. It also places an undue burden on the districts that have stepped up and created appropriate programs for children with autism. I urge you to recommend that State Education not implement this change.  Chairman and Chairman Morahan, Members of both Committees, thank you again for the opportunity to testify today. All of us at Autism Speaks look forward to working with you on responding to the urgent health crisis in autism. We stand ready to help you in all of your efforts. Thank you.          Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2007 Report Share Posted March 11, 2007 Unless I misread or confused some prior posts, I was under the impression that some said Alison stated at the hearing that autism is genetic. Perhpas I confused this with the WSJ posts. Do you recall this? Marty > > Below is the testimony of Alison Tepper Singer before The Assembly > Standing Committee On Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Development > Disabilities and the Senate Standing Committee On Mental Health And > Developmental Disabilities on March 8, 2007. > >  > > I have seen the many comments related thereto and apparently there > seems to be a disconnect on what was said. > >  > > On a related note I can add that the school Alison's daughter attends > is on the NYS list of approved private schools. Consequently, it is a > district paid programs for children who need an out of district > placement as a result of the CSE's determination that the needs of the > child cannot be served in the local district or BOCES program. > >  MARCH 8, 2007 > >  > >  > > TESTIMONY OF ALISON TEPPER SINGER > > SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT > > COMMUNICATIONS AND STRATEGY > > AUTISM SPEAKS > >  > > BEFORE > >  > > THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION > AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES > >  > > AND > >  > > THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL > DISABILITIES > >  > >  > > MARCH 8, 2007 > >  > >  > >          Chairman and Chairman Morahan, thank you for > recognizing me and for holding this very important hearing today. > >  > >          My name is Alison Singer. I am a resident of Westchester > County and the Senior Vice President for Communications and Strategy at > Autism Speaks. Autism Speaks, the largest single organization devoted > to autism in the country, was founded in February 2005 by Bob and > Suzanne of New York City who have a grandson affected by this > disorder. Over the last two years, we have joined forces with the > National Alliance for Autism Research and, very recently, Cure Autism > Now. I am here on behalf of tens of thousands of parents and their > children who belong to our organization. > >  > >          I am also here on behalf of Jodie Singer, my nine year-old > daughter, who suffers from autism, and Tepper, my 42 year old > brother with autism. Jodie truly is the sunshine in my life. She was > diagnosed at age 2 ½ and received early intervention services through > the New York State Department of Health. She attended a special > education preschool and then received special education services in > public school. However, her needs simply could not be met by the > public school system and she is currently enrolled in a private school > for children with autism, where she is making good progress, because > there is staff trained to meet her unique learning needs. My brother > , a former victim of Willowbrook, is currently living in a group > home in Rockland County, where he participates in a day program > delivering meals on wheels to home-bound citizens. In the last few > years he has learned to swim and became toilet trained in his thirties, > proving that it is never too late to offer services to persons with > autism across their lifespan. > >  > >          As you know, Chairmen, my family is not alone in the struggle > with autism spectrum disorder. Every twenty minutes, another child is > diagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and > Protection, 1 in 150 children are diagnosed with autism. That means > that in every grade in every public school in New York there is likely > to be at least one child diagnosed with autism. > >  > >          Because of this epidemic, Autism Speaks pushed very hard for > passage of the Federal Combating Autism Act, which the President signed > into law in December. The CAA authorizes nearly one billion dollars to > fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services > Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes > of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based > treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. It is our fervent hope > that the CAA will help change that, and we urge the New York > legislature to act on a companion bill. Given the prevalence of autism > spectrum disorders in the state, there is no reason that New York > should not be a research leader and respond to the huge demand for > evidence-based information regarding the education of individuals with > autism. We are in desperate need of evidence-based educational > treatments. What we have now are collections of consensus-based best > practices. But without a research foundation, " best practices " often > amount to an exchange of testimonials and fads. With good marketing > strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. >  School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources > and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely > to work with students with specific profiles. The opportunists that > are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' > " hopes " for quick answers or cures. > >  > > The No Child Left Behind Act and other such legislation require schools > to attend to and sufficiently fund programs that will promote academic > skills. On the other hand, programs and opportunities that allow for > the development of life skills are being reduced. Traditional " shop " > programs seen at the high school level, for example, have become > " technologized " to the point that an understanding of computer > technology and physics is required. Hence, as school districts ratchet > up their education programs, young adults with autism and other related > disabilities are being further disadvantaged. > >  > > Research based programs are needed to help guide school districts in > program development and implementation, as well as in program design. > Funding needs to be earmarked to help establish centers that will > develop basic competencies in those individuals for whom college is not > in the future but who have the capability to be functional members in > our communities. Such centers need to include career counselors and > placement services. Finally, with the number of children with autism > rising and more and more of those children being educated in mainstream > public school classes, teacher training for all mainstream teachers > regarding how to work appropriately with students with autism is > necessary. > >  > >          But funding educational research is just a first step. > Please allow me to suggest several other areas that your committees may > want to consider: > >  > > ·       First, families that are affected by autism need insurance > coverage. By and large, insurance companies do not reimburse parents > for the diagnosis, treatment, and services associated with spectrum > disorders. At Autism Speaks, we do not believe in competition in human > misery. But while health plans cover the broken legs and broken arms > of healthy kids, they do not cover the costs of treating a child with > autism. That's just plain wrong. You have the opportunity to change > that by mandating insurance coverage for evidence based treatments of > autism. > >  > > ·       Second, New York should become a leader in providing services > to families who live with autism. One of Autism Speaks' highest > priorities in Washington this year will be a follow-on to the Combating > Autism Act in the form of a state grant program to fund services and > treatment programs. We urge you to get ahead of Congress and pass > legislation that will allocate resources to ensure that people > suffering from ASD can be meaningful members of their communities. > >  > > ·       Third, although not necessarily in the purview of your > committees, we strongly recommend revisions to the tax code that would > benefit families with autistic children. Mothers and fathers will not > be around forever, and without a cure, autism will stay with someone > for life. We can use the tax laws to fund pre-tax accounts that allow > parents to provide for their kids, just as mothers and fathers can save > for college educations. > >  > > ·       Finally, there is great concern among families of children > with autism that New York State Ed's interpretation of the Individuals > with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA) will mean that > children whose school districts cannot provide appropriate placements > within the district and who have to attend school outside of their home > district will no longer be the responsibility of the school district in > which their parents reside and pay taxes, but rather the school > district in which the new school the child attends is physically > located. For example, if I live in Scarsdale and my daughter attends > an autism program at a school in Eastchester, responsibility for > reviewing her annual progress and evaluating her ongoing needs is > transferred to Eastchester, which may or may not decide that > Eastchester is even appropriate. While I understand that this provision > was implemented as part of the Child Find program, it will have > devastating consequences for families and children, and will result in > decreased accountability for the education of the most fragile of > children. It also places an undue burden on the districts that have > stepped up and created appropriate programs for children with autism. I > urge you to recommend that State Education not implement this change. > >  > > Chairman and Chairman Morahan, Members of both Committees, thank > you again for the opportunity to testify today. All of us at Autism > Speaks look forward to working with you on responding to the urgent > health crisis in autism. We stand ready to help you in all of your > efforts. Thank you. > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2007 Report Share Posted March 11, 2007 Marty, Yes. Thanks for clarifying this. Some did comment that a statement was made at the NYS hearing that " autism is genetic. " And I posed a question as to whether such a statement was actually made and have not commented further, pending review of a transcript or video. Now, what you have posted below appears to be the submitted written testimony. Perhaps there was a statement uttered that went outside the submitted written testimony. I submitted written testimony but my oral remarks were completely different. Thanks for posting the written testimony. I have read it with interest. Bob On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:21 PM, martinx2us wrote: Unless I misread or confused some prior posts, I was under the impression that some said Alison stated at the hearing that autism is genetic. Perhpas I confused this with the WSJ posts. Do you recall this? Marty > > Below is the testimony of Alison Tepper Singer before The Assembly > Standing Committee On Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Development > Disabilities and the Senate Standing Committee On Mental Health And > Developmental Disabilities on March 8, 2007. > >  > > I have seen the many comments related thereto and apparently there > seems to be a disconnect on what was said. > >  > > On a related note I can add that the school Alison's daughter attends > is on the NYS list of approved private schools. Consequently, it is a > district paid programs for children who need an out of district > placement as a result of the CSE's determination that the needs of the > child cannot be served in the local district or BOCES program. > >  MARCH 8, 2007 > >  > >  > > TESTIMONY OF ALISON TEPPER SINGER > > SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT > > COMMUNICATIONS AND STRATEGY > > AUTISM SPEAKS > >  > > BEFORE > >  > > THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION > AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES > >  > > AND > >  > > THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL > DISABILITIES > >  > >  > > MARCH 8, 2007 > >  > >  > >          Chairman and Chairman Morahan, thank you for > recognizing me and for holding this very important hearing today. > >  > >          My name is Alison Singer. I am a resident of Westchester > County and the Senior Vice President for Communications and Strategy at > Autism Speaks. Autism Speaks, the largest single organization devoted > to autism in the country, was founded in February 2005 by Bob and > Suzanne of New York City who have a grandson affected by this > disorder. Over the last two years, we have joined forces with the > National Alliance for Autism Research and, very recently, Cure Autism > Now. I am here on behalf of tens of thousands of parents and their > children who belong to our organization. > >  > >          I am also here on behalf of Jodie Singer, my nine year-old > daughter, who suffers from autism, and Tepper, my 42 year old > brother with autism. Jodie truly is the sunshine in my life. She was > diagnosed at age 2 ½ and received early intervention services through > the New York State Department of Health. She attended a special > education preschool and then received special education services in > public school. However, her needs simply could not be met by the > public school system and she is currently enrolled in a private school > for children with autism, where she is making good progress, because > there is staff trained to meet her unique learning needs. My brother > , a former victim of Willowbrook, is currently living in a group > home in Rockland County, where he participates in a day program > delivering meals on wheels to home-bound citizens. In the last few > years he has learned to swim and became toilet trained in his thirties, > proving that it is never too late to offer services to persons with > autism across their lifespan. > >  > >          As you know, Chairmen, my family is not alone in the struggle > with autism spectrum disorder. Every twenty minutes, another child is > diagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and > Protection, 1 in 150 children are diagnosed with autism. That means > that in every grade in every public school in New York there is likely > to be at least one child diagnosed with autism. > >  > >          Because of this epidemic, Autism Speaks pushed very hard for > passage of the Federal Combating Autism Act, which the President signed > into law in December. The CAA authorizes nearly one billion dollars to > fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services > Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes > of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based > treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. It is our fervent hope > that the CAA will help change that, and we urge the New York > legislature to act on a companion bill. Given the prevalence of autism > spectrum disorders in the state, there is no reason that New York > should not be a research leader and respond to the huge demand for > evidence-based information regarding the education of individuals with > autism. We are in desperate need of evidence-based educational > treatments. What we have now are collections of consensus-based best > practices. But without a research foundation, " best practices " often > amount to an exchange of testimonials and fads. With good marketing > strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. >  School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources > and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely > to work with students with specific profiles. The opportunists that > are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' > " hopes " for quick answers or cures. > >  > > The No Child Left Behind Act and other such legislation require schools > to attend to and sufficiently fund programs that will promote academic > skills. On the other hand, programs and opportunities that allow for > the development of life skills are being reduced. Traditional " shop " > programs seen at the high school level, for example, have become > " technologized " to the point that an understanding of computer > technology and physics is required. Hence, as school districts ratchet > up their education programs, young adults with autism and other related > disabilities are being further disadvantaged. > >  > > Research based programs are needed to help guide school districts in > program development and implementation, as well as in program design. > Funding needs to be earmarked to help establish centers that will > develop basic competencies in those individuals for whom college is not > in the future but who have the capability to be functional members in > our communities. Such centers need to include career counselors and > placement services. Finally, with the number of children with autism > rising and more and more of those children being educated in mainstream > public school classes, teacher training for all mainstream teachers > regarding how to work appropriately with students with autism is > necessary. > >  > >          But funding educational research is just a first step. > Please allow me to suggest several other areas that your committees may > want to consider: > >  > > ·       First, families that are affected by autism need insurance > coverage. By and large, insurance companies do not reimburse parents > for the diagnosis, treatment, and services associated with spectrum > disorders. At Autism Speaks, we do not believe in competition in human > misery. But while health plans cover the broken legs and broken arms > of healthy kids, they do not cover the costs of treating a child with > autism. That's just plain wrong. You have the opportunity to change > that by mandating insurance coverage for evidence based treatments of > autism. > >  > > ·       Second, New York should become a leader in providing services > to families who live with autism. One of Autism Speaks' highest > priorities in Washington this year will be a follow-on to the Combating > Autism Act in the form of a state grant program to fund services and > treatment programs. We urge you to get ahead of Congress and pass > legislation that will allocate resources to ensure that people > suffering from ASD can be meaningful members of their communities. > >  > > ·       Third, although not necessarily in the purview of your > committees, we strongly recommend revisions to the tax code that would > benefit families with autistic children. Mothers and fathers will not > be around forever, and without a cure, autism will stay with someone > for life. We can use the tax laws to fund pre-tax accounts that allow > parents to provide for their kids, just as mothers and fathers can save > for college educations. > >  > > ·       Finally, there is great concern among families of children > with autism that New York State Ed's interpretation of the Individuals > with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA) will mean that > children whose school districts cannot provide appropriate placements > within the district and who have to attend school outside of their home > district will no longer be the responsibility of the school district in > which their parents reside and pay taxes, but rather the school > district in which the new school the child attends is physically > located. For example, if I live in Scarsdale and my daughter attends > an autism program at a school in Eastchester, responsibility for > reviewing her annual progress and evaluating her ongoing needs is > transferred to Eastchester, which may or may not decide that > Eastchester is even appropriate. While I understand that this provision > was implemented as part of the Child Find program, it will have > devastating consequences for families and children, and will result in > decreased accountability for the education of the most fragile of > children. It also places an undue burden on the districts that have > stepped up and created appropriate programs for children with autism. I > urge you to recommend that State Education not implement this change. > >  > > Chairman and Chairman Morahan, Members of both Committees, thank > you again for the opportunity to testify today. All of us at Autism > Speaks look forward to working with you on responding to the urgent > health crisis in autism. We stand ready to help you in all of your > efforts. Thank you. > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2007 Report Share Posted March 11, 2007 Just a follow-up. I used the expression " disconnect " in reference to the following comments: On Mar 10, 2007, at 4:25 PM, S Colletti wrote: " Bob - Singer did indeed say that it was genetic, then went on to talk about her brother and then her daugther...` " I was not there so I am in no position to comment on any remarks outside the written testimony. As an aside and for what it is worth, I wrote to her without mentioning any specific person to ask her is she said autism is genetic after reading Sally's comment and she told me that she never said such a thing at the hearing. Sally perhaps you can calrify this. No disrespect was intended for you for my use of the word disconnect. Marty > > > > Below is the testimony of Alison Tepper Singer before The Assembly > > Standing Committee On Mental Health, Mental Retardation and > Development > > Disabilities and the Senate Standing Committee On Mental Health And > > Developmental Disabilities on March 8, 2007. > > > >  > > > > I have seen the many comments related thereto and apparently there > > seems to be a disconnect on what was said. > > > >  > > > > On a related note I can add that the school Alison's daughter attends > > is on the NYS list of approved private schools. Consequently, it > is a > > district paid programs for children who need an out of district > > placement as a result of the CSE's determination that the needs of the > > child cannot be served in the local district or BOCES program. > > > >  MARCH 8, 2007 > > > >  > > > >  > > > > TESTIMONY OF ALISON TEPPER SINGER > > > > SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT > > > > COMMUNICATIONS AND STRATEGY > > > > AUTISM SPEAKS > > > >  > > > > BEFORE > > > >  > > > > THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION > > AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES > > > >  > > > > AND > > > >  > > > > THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL > > DISABILITIES > > > >  > > > >  > > > > MARCH 8, 2007 > > > >  > > > >  > > > >          Chairman and > Chairman Morahan, thank you for > > recognizing me and for holding this very important hearing today. > > > >  > > > >          My name is Alison > Singer. I am a resident of Westchester > > County and the Senior Vice President for Communications and Strategy > at > > Autism Speaks. Autism Speaks, the largest single organization > devoted > > to autism in the country, was founded in February 2005 by Bob and > > Suzanne of New York City who have a grandson affected by this > > disorder. Over the last two years, we have joined forces with the > > National Alliance for Autism Research and, very recently, Cure Autism > > Now. I am here on behalf of tens of thousands of parents and > their > > children who belong to our organization. > > > >  > > > >          I am also here on behalf > of Jodie Singer, my nine year-old > > daughter, who suffers from autism, and Tepper, my 42 year old > > brother with autism. Jodie truly is the sunshine in my life. She > was > > diagnosed at age 2 ½ and received early intervention services > through > > the New York State Department of Health. She attended a special > > education preschool and then received special education services in > > public school. However, her needs simply could not be met by the > > public school system and she is currently enrolled in a private school > > for children with autism, where she is making good progress, because > > there is staff trained to meet her unique learning needs. My brother > > , a former victim of Willowbrook, is currently living in a group > > home in Rockland County, where he participates in a day program > > delivering meals on wheels to home-bound citizens. In the last > few > > years he has learned to swim and became toilet trained in his > thirties, > > proving that it is never too late to offer services to persons with > > autism across their lifespan. > > > >  > > > >          As you know, Chairmen, > my family is not alone in the struggle > > with autism spectrum disorder. Every twenty minutes, another > child is > > diagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and > > Protection, 1 in 150 children are diagnosed with autism. That means > > that in every grade in every public school in New York there is likely > > to be at least one child diagnosed with autism. > > > >  > > > >          Because of this > epidemic, Autism Speaks pushed very hard for > > passage of the Federal Combating Autism Act, which the President > signed > > into law in December. The CAA authorizes nearly one billion > dollars to > > fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services > > Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes > > of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based > > treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to > > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except > > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. It is our fervent > hope > > that the CAA will help change that, and we urge the New York > > legislature to act on a companion bill. Given the prevalence of autism > > spectrum disorders in the state, there is no reason that New York > > should not be a research leader and respond to the huge demand for > > evidence-based information regarding the education of individuals with > > autism. We are in desperate need of evidence-based educational > > treatments. What we have now are collections of consensus-based > best > > practices. But without a research foundation, " best > practices " often > > amount to an exchange of testimonials and fads. With good > marketing > > strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot > therapy. > >  School officials charged with the appropriation of limited > resources > > and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely > > to work with students with specific profiles. The opportunists > that > > are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' > > " hopes " for quick answers or cures. > > > >  > > > > The No Child Left Behind Act and other such legislation require > schools > > to attend to and sufficiently fund programs that will promote > academic > > skills. On the other hand, programs and opportunities that allow > for > > the development of life skills are being reduced. > Traditional " shop " > > programs seen at the high school level, for example, have become > > " technologized " to the point that an understanding of computer > > technology and physics is required. Hence, as school > districts ratchet > > up their education programs, young adults with autism and other > related > > disabilities are being further disadvantaged. > > > >  > > > > Research based programs are needed to help guide school districts in > > program development and implementation, as well as in program > design. > > Funding needs to be earmarked to help establish centers that will > > develop basic competencies in those individuals for whom college is > not > > in the future but who have the capability to be functional members > in > > our communities. Such centers need to include career counselors > and > > placement services. Finally, with the number of children with > autism > > rising and more and more of those children being educated in > mainstream > > public school classes, teacher training for all mainstream teachers > > regarding how to work appropriately with students with autism is > > necessary. > > > >  > > > >          But funding educational > research is just a first step. > > Please allow me to suggest several other areas that your committees > may > > want to consider: > > > >  > > > > ·       First, families that are > affected by autism need insurance > > coverage. By and large, insurance companies do not reimburse > parents > > for the diagnosis, treatment, and services associated with spectrum > > disorders. At Autism Speaks, we do not believe in competition in > human > > misery. But while health plans cover the broken legs and broken > arms > > of healthy kids, they do not cover the costs of treating a child with > > autism. That's just plain wrong. You have the opportunity to > change > > that by mandating insurance coverage for evidence based treatments of > > autism. > > > >  > > > > ·       Second, New York should become a > leader in providing services > > to families who live with autism. One of Autism Speaks' highest > > priorities in Washington this year will be a follow-on to the > Combating > > Autism Act in the form of a state grant program to fund services and > > treatment programs. We urge you to get ahead of Congress and pass > > legislation that will allocate resources to ensure that people > > suffering from ASD can be meaningful members of their communities. > > > >  > > > > ·       Third, although not necessarily > in the purview of your > > committees, we strongly recommend revisions to the tax code that would > > benefit families with autistic children. Mothers and fathers will > not > > be around forever, and without a cure, autism will stay with someone > > for life. We can use the tax laws to fund pre-tax accounts that > allow > > parents to provide for their kids, just as mothers and fathers can > save > > for college educations. > > > >  > > > > ·       Finally, there is great concern > among families of children > > with autism that New York State Ed's interpretation of the Individuals > > with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA) will mean that > > children whose school districts cannot provide appropriate placements > > within the district and who have to attend school outside of their > home > > district will no longer be the responsibility of the school district > in > > which their parents reside and pay taxes, but rather the school > > district in which the new school the child attends is physically > > located. For example, if I live in Scarsdale and my daughter > attends > > an autism program at a school in Eastchester, responsibility for > > reviewing her annual progress and evaluating her ongoing needs is > > transferred to Eastchester, which may or may not decide that > > Eastchester is even appropriate. While I understand that this > provision > > was implemented as part of the Child Find program, it will have > > devastating consequences for families and children, and will result in > > decreased accountability for the education of the most fragile of > > children. It also places an undue burden on the districts that have > > stepped up and created appropriate programs for children with autism. > I > > urge you to recommend that State Education not implement this change. > > > >  > > > > Chairman and Chairman Morahan, Members of both Committees, > thank > > you again for the opportunity to testify today. All of us at > Autism > > Speaks look forward to working with you on responding to the urgent > > health crisis in autism. We stand ready to help you in all of > your > > efforts. Thank you. > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2007 Report Share Posted March 11, 2007 I heard her testimony. I don’t remember her talking about genetics. I have a video- but right now too busy with Conference stuff to work on it- it’s going to be a few days, if not next week before I can post it. Many people talked in addition to what was written down. On 3/11/07 6:37 PM, " Krakow " <rkrakow@...> wrote: Marty, Yes. Thanks for clarifying this. Some did comment that a statement was made at the NYS hearing that " autism is genetic. " And I posed a question as to whether such a statement was actually made and have not commented further, pending review of a transcript or video. Now, what you have posted below appears to be the submitted written testimony. Perhaps there was a statement uttered that went outside the submitted written testimony. I submitted written testimony but my oral remarks were completely different. Thanks for posting the written testimony. I have read it with interest. Bob On Mar 11, 2007, at 6:21 PM, martinx2us wrote: Unless I misread or confused some prior posts, I was under the impression that some said Alison stated at the hearing that autism is genetic. Perhpas I confused this with the WSJ posts. Do you recall this? Marty > > Below is the testimony of Alison Tepper Singer before The Assembly > Standing Committee On Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Development > Disabilities and the Senate Standing Committee On Mental Health And > Developmental Disabilities on March 8, 2007. > >  > > I have seen the many comments related thereto and apparently there > seems to be a disconnect on what was said. > >  > > On a related note I can add that the school Alison's daughter attends > is on the NYS list of approved private schools. Consequently, it is a > district paid programs for children who need an out of district > placement as a result of the CSE's determination that the needs of the > child cannot be served in the local district or BOCES program. > >  MARCH 8, 2007 > >  > >  > > TESTIMONY OF ALISON TEPPER SINGER > > SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT > > COMMUNICATIONS AND STRATEGY > > AUTISM SPEAKS > >  > > BEFORE > >  > > THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION > AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES > >  > > AND > >  > > THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL > DISABILITIES > >  > >  > > MARCH 8, 2007 > >  > >  > >          Chairman and Chairman Morahan, thank you for > recognizing me and for holding this very important hearing today. > >  > >          My name is Alison Singer. I am a resident of Westchester > County and the Senior Vice President for Communications and Strategy at > Autism Speaks. Autism Speaks, the largest single organization devoted > to autism in the country, was founded in February 2005 by Bob and > Suzanne of New York City who have a grandson affected by this > disorder. Over the last two years, we have joined forces with the > National Alliance for Autism Research and, very recently, Cure Autism > Now. I am here on behalf of tens of thousands of parents and their > children who belong to our organization. > >  > >          I am also here on behalf of Jodie Singer, my nine year-old > daughter, who suffers from autism, and Tepper, my 42 year old > brother with autism. Jodie truly is the sunshine in my life. She was > diagnosed at age 2 ½ and received early intervention services through > the New York State Department of Health. She attended a special > education preschool and then received special education services in > public school. However, her needs simply could not be met by the > public school system and she is currently enrolled in a private school > for children with autism, where she is making good progress, because > there is staff trained to meet her unique learning needs. My brother > , a former victim of Willowbrook, is currently living in a group > home in Rockland County, where he participates in a day program > delivering meals on wheels to home-bound citizens. In the last few > years he has learned to swim and became toilet trained in his thirties, > proving that it is never too late to offer services to persons with > autism across their lifespan. > >  > >          As you know, Chairmen, my family is not alone in the struggle > with autism spectrum disorder. Every twenty minutes, another child is > diagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and > Protection, 1 in 150 children are diagnosed with autism. That means > that in every grade in every public school in New York there is likely > to be at least one child diagnosed with autism. > >  > >          Because of this epidemic, Autism Speaks pushed very hard for > passage of the Federal Combating Autism Act, which the President signed > into law in December. The CAA authorizes nearly one billion dollars to > fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services > Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes > of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based > treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. It is our fervent hope > that the CAA will help change that, and we urge the New York > legislature to act on a companion bill. Given the prevalence of autism > spectrum disorders in the state, there is no reason that New York > should not be a research leader and respond to the huge demand for > evidence-based information regarding the education of individuals with > autism. We are in desperate need of evidence-based educational > treatments. What we have now are collections of consensus-based best > practices. But without a research foundation, " best practices " often > amount to an exchange of testimonials and fads. With good marketing > strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. >  School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources > and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely > to work with students with specific profiles. The opportunists that > are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' > " hopes " for quick answers or cures. > >  > > The No Child Left Behind Act and other such legislation require schools > to attend to and sufficiently fund programs that will promote academic > skills. On the other hand, programs and opportunities that allow for > the development of life skills are being reduced. Traditional " shop " > programs seen at the high school level, for example, have become > " technologized " to the point that an understanding of computer > technology and physics is required. Hence, as school districts ratchet > up their education programs, young adults with autism and other related > disabilities are being further disadvantaged. > >  > > Research based programs are needed to help guide school districts in > program development and implementation, as well as in program design. > Funding needs to be earmarked to help establish centers that will > develop basic competencies in those individuals for whom college is not > in the future but who have the capability to be functional members in > our communities. Such centers need to include career counselors and > placement services. Finally, with the number of children with autism > rising and more and more of those children being educated in mainstream > public school classes, teacher training for all mainstream teachers > regarding how to work appropriately with students with autism is > necessary. > >  > >          But funding educational research is just a first step. > Please allow me to suggest several other areas that your committees may > want to consider: > >  > > ·       First, families that are affected by autism need insurance > coverage. By and large, insurance companies do not reimburse parents > for the diagnosis, treatment, and services associated with spectrum > disorders. At Autism Speaks, we do not believe in competition in human > misery. But while health plans cover the broken legs and broken arms > of healthy kids, they do not cover the costs of treating a child with > autism. That's just plain wrong. You have the opportunity to change > that by mandating insurance coverage for evidence based treatments of > autism. > >  > > ·       Second, New York should become a leader in providing services > to families who live with autism. One of Autism Speaks' highest > priorities in Washington this year will be a follow-on to the Combating > Autism Act in the form of a state grant program to fund services and > treatment programs. We urge you to get ahead of Congress and pass > legislation that will allocate resources to ensure that people > suffering from ASD can be meaningful members of their communities. > >  > > ·       Third, although not necessarily in the purview of your > committees, we strongly recommend revisions to the tax code that would > benefit families with autistic children. Mothers and fathers will not > be around forever, and without a cure, autism will stay with someone > for life. We can use the tax laws to fund pre-tax accounts that allow > parents to provide for their kids, just as mothers and fathers can save > for college educations. > >  > > ·       Finally, there is great concern among families of children > with autism that New York State Ed's interpretation of the Individuals > with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA) will mean that > children whose school districts cannot provide appropriate placements > within the district and who have to attend school outside of their home > district will no longer be the responsibility of the school district in > which their parents reside and pay taxes, but rather the school > district in which the new school the child attends is physically > located. For example, if I live in Scarsdale and my daughter attends > an autism program at a school in Eastchester, responsibility for > reviewing her annual progress and evaluating her ongoing needs is > transferred to Eastchester, which may or may not decide that > Eastchester is even appropriate. While I understand that this provision > was implemented as part of the Child Find program, it will have > devastating consequences for families and children, and will result in > decreased accountability for the education of the most fragile of > children. It also places an undue burden on the districts that have > stepped up and created appropriate programs for children with autism. I > urge you to recommend that State Education not implement this change. > >  > > Chairman and Chairman Morahan, Members of both Committees, thank > you again for the opportunity to testify today. All of us at Autism > Speaks look forward to working with you on responding to the urgent > health crisis in autism. We stand ready to help you in all of your > efforts. Thank you. > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > >  > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 This is her written testimony, not exactly what she said.... > > > > Below is the testimony of Alison Tepper Singer before The Assembly > > Standing Committee On Mental Health, Mental Retardation and > Development > > Disabilities and the Senate Standing Committee On Mental Health And > > Developmental Disabilities on March 8, 2007. > > > >  > > > > I have seen the many comments related thereto and apparently there > > seems to be a disconnect on what was said. > > > >  > > > > On a related note I can add that the school Alison's daughter attends > > is on the NYS list of approved private schools. Consequently, it > is a > > district paid programs for children who need an out of district > > placement as a result of the CSE's determination that the needs of > the > > child cannot be served in the local district or BOCES program. > > > >  MARCH 8, 2007 > > > >  > > > >  > > > > TESTIMONY OF ALISON TEPPER SINGER > > > > SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT > > > > COMMUNICATIONS AND STRATEGY > > > > AUTISM SPEAKS > > > >  > > > > BEFORE > > > >  > > > > THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION > > AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES > > > >  > > > > AND > > > >  > > > > THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL > > DISABILITIES > > > >  > > > >  > > > > MARCH 8, 2007 > > > >  > > > >  > > > >          Chairman and > Chairman Morahan, thank you for > > recognizing me and for holding this very important hearing today. > > > >  > > > >          My name is Alison > Singer. I am a resident of Westchester > > County and the Senior Vice President for Communications and Strategy > at > > Autism Speaks. Autism Speaks, the largest single organization > devoted > > to autism in the country, was founded in February 2005 by Bob and > > Suzanne of New York City who have a grandson affected by this > > disorder. Over the last two years, we have joined forces with the > > National Alliance for Autism Research and, very recently, Cure Autism > > Now. I am here on behalf of tens of thousands of parents and > their > > children who belong to our organization. > > > >  > > > >          I am also here on behalf > of Jodie Singer, my nine year-old > > daughter, who suffers from autism, and Tepper, my 42 year old > > brother with autism. Jodie truly is the sunshine in my life. She > was > > diagnosed at age 2 ½ and received early intervention services > through > > the New York State Department of Health. She attended a special > > education preschool and then received special education services in > > public school. However, her needs simply could not be met by the > > public school system and she is currently enrolled in a private > school > > for children with autism, where she is making good progress, because > > there is staff trained to meet her unique learning needs. My brother > > , a former victim of Willowbrook, is currently living in a > group > > home in Rockland County, where he participates in a day program > > delivering meals on wheels to home-bound citizens. In the last > few > > years he has learned to swim and became toilet trained in his > thirties, > > proving that it is never too late to offer services to persons with > > autism across their lifespan. > > > >  > > > >          As you know, Chairmen, > my family is not alone in the struggle > > with autism spectrum disorder. Every twenty minutes, another > child is > > diagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control and > > Protection, 1 in 150 children are diagnosed with autism. That means > > that in every grade in every public school in New York there is > likely > > to be at least one child diagnosed with autism. > > > >  > > > >          Because of this > epidemic, Autism Speaks pushed very hard for > > passage of the Federal Combating Autism Act, which the President > signed > > into law in December. The CAA authorizes nearly one billion > dollars to > > fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services > > Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes > > of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based > > treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to > > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except > > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. It is our fervent > hope > > that the CAA will help change that, and we urge the New York > > legislature to act on a companion bill. Given the prevalence of > autism > > spectrum disorders in the state, there is no reason that New York > > should not be a research leader and respond to the huge demand for > > evidence-based information regarding the education of individuals > with > > autism. We are in desperate need of evidence-based educational > > treatments. What we have now are collections of consensus- based > best > > practices. But without a research foundation, " best > practices " often > > amount to an exchange of testimonials and fads. With good > marketing > > strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot > therapy. > >  School officials charged with the appropriation of limited > resources > > and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely > > to work with students with specific profiles. The opportunists > that > > are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these > families' > > " hopes " for quick answers or cures. > > > >  > > > > The No Child Left Behind Act and other such legislation require > schools > > to attend to and sufficiently fund programs that will promote > academic > > skills. On the other hand, programs and opportunities that allow > for > > the development of life skills are being reduced. > Traditional " shop " > > programs seen at the high school level, for example, have become > > " technologized " to the point that an understanding of computer > > technology and physics is required. Hence, as school > districts ratchet > > up their education programs, young adults with autism and other > related > > disabilities are being further disadvantaged. > > > >  > > > > Research based programs are needed to help guide school districts in > > program development and implementation, as well as in program > design. > > Funding needs to be earmarked to help establish centers that will > > develop basic competencies in those individuals for whom college is > not > > in the future but who have the capability to be functional members > in > > our communities. Such centers need to include career counselors > and > > placement services. Finally, with the number of children with > autism > > rising and more and more of those children being educated in > mainstream > > public school classes, teacher training for all mainstream teachers > > regarding how to work appropriately with students with autism is > > necessary. > > > >  > > > >          But funding educational > research is just a first step. > > Please allow me to suggest several other areas that your committees > may > > want to consider: > > > >  > > > > ·       First, families that are > affected by autism need insurance > > coverage. By and large, insurance companies do not reimburse > parents > > for the diagnosis, treatment, and services associated with spectrum > > disorders. At Autism Speaks, we do not believe in competition in > human > > misery. But while health plans cover the broken legs and broken > arms > > of healthy kids, they do not cover the costs of treating a child with > > autism. That's just plain wrong. You have the opportunity to > change > > that by mandating insurance coverage for evidence based treatments of > > autism. > > > >  > > > > ·       Second, New York should become a > leader in providing services > > to families who live with autism. One of Autism Speaks' highest > > priorities in Washington this year will be a follow-on to the > Combating > > Autism Act in the form of a state grant program to fund services and > > treatment programs. We urge you to get ahead of Congress and pass > > legislation that will allocate resources to ensure that people > > suffering from ASD can be meaningful members of their communities. > > > >  > > > > ·       Third, although not necessarily > in the purview of your > > committees, we strongly recommend revisions to the tax code that > would > > benefit families with autistic children. Mothers and fathers will > not > > be around forever, and without a cure, autism will stay with someone > > for life. We can use the tax laws to fund pre-tax accounts that > allow > > parents to provide for their kids, just as mothers and fathers can > save > > for college educations. > > > >  > > > > ·       Finally, there is great concern > among families of children > > with autism that New York State Ed's interpretation of the > Individuals > > with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA) will mean that > > children whose school districts cannot provide appropriate placements > > within the district and who have to attend school outside of their > home > > district will no longer be the responsibility of the school district > in > > which their parents reside and pay taxes, but rather the school > > district in which the new school the child attends is physically > > located. For example, if I live in Scarsdale and my daughter > attends > > an autism program at a school in Eastchester, responsibility for > > reviewing her annual progress and evaluating her ongoing needs is > > transferred to Eastchester, which may or may not decide that > > Eastchester is even appropriate. While I understand that this > provision > > was implemented as part of the Child Find program, it will have > > devastating consequences for families and children, and will result > in > > decreased accountability for the education of the most fragile of > > children. It also places an undue burden on the districts that have > > stepped up and created appropriate programs for children with autism. > I > > urge you to recommend that State Education not implement this change. > > > >  > > > > Chairman and Chairman Morahan, Members of both Committees, > thank > > you again for the opportunity to testify today. All of us at > Autism > > Speaks look forward to working with you on responding to the urgent > > health crisis in autism. We stand ready to help you in all of > your > > efforts. Thank you. > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > >  > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 , Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she read her testimony, which she was asked not to do before she got up there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit balls at her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with this in her written testimony: " With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely to work with students with specific profiles. Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed right towards the biomed treatment!!! ******* " The opportunists that are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' " hopes " for quick answers or cures. " ****** My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children. As Imus said, have a backbone here! Again, it's not in particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable being there. It's AS as a whole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 She did look uncomfortable. Maybe she doesn’t like public speaking- who knows? Honestly, it didn’t matter to me what she said. Anything she had to say won’t help my son. We’ve got 2 hearings in Suffolk Co this week about thimerosal in vaccines, I’ve got a luncheon with Gov. Spitzer’s wife on Friday, we might have to reschedule my son’s chelation appt. this week, I’ve got to get 200 packets out for the LIAC tomorrow (got 40 done so far)------ my priority is not what thinks. And the more we obsess over her- the more importance her comments get. Yes- I know she speaks for AS. But when my son recovers it’s not going to be because of AS or NAAR. Again- the videos will get done when I can get them done. Not mad at you Sally. Just have a lot to do.... On 3/11/07 7:09 PM, " S Colletti " <rainmanmama@...> wrote: , Whenever you get a chance check through it, but in the meantime there was discussion while she was sitting there. This occured after she read her testimony, which she was asked not to do before she got up there. Maybe I was too busy with wanting to shoot spit balls at her for her wallstreet journal editorial to really pay any attention at all! She continues on with the same garbage from the WSJ with this in her written testimony: " With good marketing strategies, any method or approach can become the next new hot therapy. School officials charged with the appropriation of limited resources and expending public funds need to know what interventions are likely to work with students with specific profiles. Don't any of you have a problem with this statement? It's directed right towards the biomed treatment!!! ******* " The opportunists that are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on these families' " hopes " for quick answers or cures. " ****** My god, if anything stand up for what you've with your children. As Imus said, have a backbone here! Again, it's not in particular, she is just a pawn and she looked downright uncomfortable being there. It's AS as a whole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Hey it's cool and I totally agree with you. The only reason I asked you about it was to verify what someone is questioning me about, when those questions should not be directed at me. I was just sitting and listening and again, maybe I heard wrong, if I did no big deal. Like you said, who cares? Just remember to take some breaks for yourself so you don't get too run-down. You never took a break on Thursday...amazing. Family is always first! Have a good week! > > She did look uncomfortable. Maybe she doesn¹t like public speaking- who > knows? > > Honestly, it didn¹t matter to me what she said. Anything she had to say > won¹t help my son. > > We¹ve got 2 hearings in Suffolk Co this week about thimerosal in vaccines, > I¹ve got a luncheon > with Gov. Spitzer¹s wife on Friday, we might have to reschedule my son¹s > chelation appt. this week, > I¹ve got to get 200 packets out for the LIAC tomorrow (got 40 done so > far)------ my priority is not what thinks. > And the more we obsess over her- the more importance her comments get. Yes- > I know she speaks for AS. > But when my son recovers it¹s not going to be because of AS or NAAR. > > Again- the videos will get done when I can get them done. Not mad at you > Sally. Just have a lot to do.... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Has anyone seen him and Chen of the CDC at the same place at the same time?... Hmmm..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below is the testimony of Alison Tepper Singer before The > > > > Assembly > > > > > > > Standing Committee On Mental Health, Mental Retardation and > > > > > > Development > > > > > > > Disabilities and the Senate Standing Committee On Mental > > Health > > > > And > > > > > > > Developmental Disabilities on March 8, 2007. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have seen the many comments related thereto and > > apparently > > > > there > > > > > > > seems to be a disconnect on what was said. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On a related note I can add that the school Alison's > > daughter > > > > > attends > > > > > > > is on the NYS list of approved private schools. > > > Consequently, > > > > it > > > > > > is a > > > > > > > district paid programs for children who need an out of > > district > > > > > > > placement as a result of the CSE's determination that the > > needs > > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > child cannot be served in the local district or BOCES > > > program. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  MARCH 8, 2007 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TESTIMONY OF ALISON TEPPER SINGER > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > COMMUNICATIONS AND STRATEGY > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AUTISM SPEAKS > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BEFORE > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL > > > > RETARDATION > > > > > > > AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AND > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND > > DEVELOPMENTAL > > > > > > > DISABILITIES > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MARCH 8, 2007 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          Chairman and > > > > > > Chairman Morahan, thank you for > > > > > > > recognizing me and for holding this very important hearing > > > > today. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          My name is Alison > > > > > > Singer. I am a resident of Westchester > > > > > > > County and the Senior Vice President for Communications and > > > > Strategy > > > > > > at > > > > > > > Autism Speaks. Autism Speaks, the largest single > > > organization > > > > > > devoted > > > > > > > to autism in the country, was founded in February 2005 by > > Bob > > > > and > > > > > > > Suzanne of New York City who have a grandson > > affected by > > > > this > > > > > > > disorder. Over the last two years, we have joined forces > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > National Alliance for Autism Research and, very recently, > > Cure > > > > > Autism > > > > > > > Now. I am here on behalf of tens of thousands of parents > > and > > > > > > their > > > > > > > children who belong to our organization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          I am also here on > > > > > behalf > > > > > > of Jodie Singer, my nine year-old > > > > > > > daughter, who suffers from autism, and Tepper, my 42 > > > > year old > > > > > > > brother with autism. Jodie truly is the sunshine in my > > life. > > > > She > > > > > > was > > > > > > > diagnosed at age 2 ½ and received early intervention > > > services > > > > > > through > > > > > > > the New York State Department of Health. She attended a > > > special > > > > > > > education preschool and then received special education > > > > services in > > > > > > > public school. However, her needs simply could not be met > > by > > > > the > > > > > > > public school system and she is currently enrolled in a > > private > > > > > school > > > > > > > for children with autism, where she is making good > > progress, > > > > because > > > > > > > there is staff trained to meet her unique learning needs. > > My > > > > brother > > > > > > > , a former victim of Willowbrook, is currently > > living in a > > > > > group > > > > > > > home in Rockland County, where he participates in a day > > program > > > > > > > delivering meals on wheels to home-bound citizens. In the > > > last > > > > > > few > > > > > > > years he has learned to swim and became toilet trained in > > his > > > > > > thirties, > > > > > > > proving that it is never too late to offer services to > > persons > > > > with > > > > > > > autism across their lifespan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          As you know, > > > Chairmen, > > > > > > my family is not alone in the struggle > > > > > > > with autism spectrum disorder. Every twenty minutes, > > another > > > > > > child is > > > > > > > diagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control > > and > > > > > > > Protection, 1 in 150 children are diagnosed with autism. > > That > > > > means > > > > > > > that in every grade in every public school in New York > > there is > > > > > likely > > > > > > > to be at least one child diagnosed with autism. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          Because of this > > > > > > epidemic, Autism Speaks pushed very hard for > > > > > > > passage of the Federal Combating Autism Act, which the > > President > > > > > > signed > > > > > > > into law in December. The CAA authorizes nearly one > > billion > > > > > > dollars to > > > > > > > fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services > > > > > > > Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into > > the > > > > > causes > > > > > > > of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence > > based > > > > > > > treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective > > > means > > > > > to > > > > > > > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based > > treatments > > > > except > > > > > > > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. It is our > > > fervent > > > > > > hope > > > > > > > that the CAA will help change that, and we urge the New > > York > > > > > > > legislature to act on a companion bill. Given the > > prevalence of > > > > > autism > > > > > > > spectrum disorders in the state, there is no reason that > > New > > > > York > > > > > > > should not be a research leader and respond to the huge > > demand > > > > for > > > > > > > evidence-based information regarding the education of > > > > individuals > > > > > with > > > > > > > autism. We are in desperate need of evidence-based > > > educational > > > > > > > treatments. What we have now are collections of > > > consensus-based > > > > > > best > > > > > > > practices. But without a research foundation, " best > > > > > > practices " often > > > > > > > amount to an exchange of testimonials and fads. With good > > > > > > marketing > > > > > > > strategies, any method or approach can become the next new > > hot > > > > > > therapy. > > > > > > >  School officials charged with the appropriation of > > limited > > > > > > resources > > > > > > > and expending public funds need to know what interventions > > are > > > > > likely > > > > > > > to work with students with specific profiles. The > > > opportunists > > > > > > that > > > > > > > are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on > > these > > > > > families' > > > > > > > " hopes " for quick answers or cures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The No Child Left Behind Act and other such legislation > > > require > > > > > > schools > > > > > > > to attend to and sufficiently fund programs that will > > > > > promote > > > > > > academic > > > > > > > skills. On the other hand, programs and opportunities that > > > > allow > > > > > > for > > > > > > > the development of life skills are being > > > reduced. > > > > > > Traditional " shop " > > > > > > > programs seen at the high school level, for example, have > > become > > > > > > > " technologized " to the point that an understanding of > > computer > > > > > > > technology and physics is required. Hence, as school > > > > > > districts ratchet > > > > > > > up their education programs, young adults with autism and > > other > > > > > > related > > > > > > > disabilities are being further disadvantaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Research based programs are needed to help guide school > > > > districts in > > > > > > > program development and implementation, as well as in > > program > > > > > > design. > > > > > > > Funding needs to be earmarked to help establish centers > > that > > > > will > > > > > > > develop basic competencies in those individuals for whom > > > > college is > > > > > > not > > > > > > > in the future but who have the capability to be functional > > > > > members > > > > > > in > > > > > > > our communities. Such centers need to include career > > > counselors > > > > > > and > > > > > > > placement services. Finally, with the number of children > > > with > > > > > > autism > > > > > > > rising and more and more of those children being educated > > in > > > > > > mainstream > > > > > > > public school classes, teacher training for all mainstream > > > > teachers > > > > > > > regarding how to work appropriately with students with > > autism is > > > > > > > necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          But funding > > > educational > > > > > > research is just a first step. > > > > > > > Please allow me to suggest several other areas that your > > > > committees > > > > > > may > > > > > > > want to consider: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ·       First, families that are > > > > > > affected by autism need insurance > > > > > > > coverage. By and large, insurance companies do not > > reimburse > > > > > > parents > > > > > > > for the diagnosis, treatment, and services associated with > > > > spectrum > > > > > > > disorders. At Autism Speaks, we do not believe in > > > competition > > > > in > > > > > > human > > > > > > > misery. But while health plans cover the broken legs and > > > broken > > > > > > arms > > > > > > > of healthy kids, they do not cover the costs of treating a > > child > > > > > with > > > > > > > autism. That's just plain wrong. You have the > > > opportunity to > > > > > > change > > > > > > > that by mandating insurance coverage for evidence based > > > > treatments > > > > > of > > > > > > > autism. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ·       Second, New York should > > > become > > > > > a > > > > > > leader in providing services > > > > > > > to families who live with autism. One of Autism Speaks' > > > highest > > > > > > > priorities in Washington this year will be a follow-on to > > the > > > > > > Combating > > > > > > > Autism Act in the form of a state grant program to fund > > > > services and > > > > > > > treatment programs. We urge you to get ahead of Congress > > and > > > > > pass > > > > > > > legislation that will allocate resources to ensure that > > people > > > > > > > suffering from ASD can be meaningful members of their > > > > communities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ·       Third, although not > > > necessarily > > > > > > in the purview of your > > > > > > > committees, we strongly recommend revisions to the tax > > code that > > > > > would > > > > > > > benefit families with autistic children. Mothers and > > fathers > > > > > will > > > > > > not > > > > > > > be around forever, and without a cure, autism will stay > > with > > > > someone > > > > > > > for life. We can use the tax laws to fund pre-tax accounts > > > that > > > > > > allow > > > > > > > parents to provide for their kids, just as mothers and > > fathers > > > > can > > > > > > save > > > > > > > for college educations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ·       Finally, there is great > > > concern > > > > > > among families of children > > > > > > > with autism that New York State Ed's interpretation of the > > > > > Individuals > > > > > > > with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA) will > > mean > > > > that > > > > > > > children whose school districts cannot provide appropriate > > > > > placements > > > > > > > within the district and who have to attend school outside > > of > > > > their > > > > > > home > > > > > > > district will no longer be the responsibility of the school > > > > district > > > > > > in > > > > > > > which their parents reside and pay taxes, but rather the > > school > > > > > > > district in which the new school the child attends is > > physically > > > > > > > located. For example, if I live in Scarsdale and my > > daughter > > > > > > attends > > > > > > > an autism program at a school in Eastchester, > > responsibility for > > > > > > > reviewing her annual progress and evaluating her ongoing > > needs > > > > is > > > > > > > transferred to Eastchester, which may or may not decide > > that > > > > > > > Eastchester is even appropriate. While I understand that > > this > > > > > > provision > > > > > > > was implemented as part of the Child Find program, it will > > have > > > > > > > devastating consequences for families and children, and > > will > > > > result > > > > > in > > > > > > > decreased accountability for the education of the most > > fragile > > > > of > > > > > > > children. It also places an undue burden on the districts > > that > > > > have > > > > > > > stepped up and created appropriate programs for children > > with > > > > > autism. > > > > > > I > > > > > > > urge you to recommend that State Education not implement > > this > > > > > change. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chairman and Chairman Morahan, Members of both > > > > Committees, > > > > > > thank > > > > > > > you again for the opportunity to testify today. All of us > > at > > > > > > Autism > > > > > > > Speaks look forward to working with you on responding to > > the > > > > urgent > > > > > > > health crisis in autism. We stand ready to help you in all > > > of > > > > > > your > > > > > > > efforts. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 My involvement with the Long Island Group of AS is zero. I still go to the walks but no longer have any meaningful participation. On a National Level I maintain a dialogue with Alison and others and fully express my views on many issues. AS has some very talented individuals but also some horrific carry-over staff from NAAR. So essentially I try to contribute where I can on a national level and stay away from the local politics. Marty > > > > > > > > > > > Heidi, you are absolutely correct in that AS can't be all things to everyone.> > But for sake of fairness, I think some of her comments are taken a bit out of> > context.> > You state "She points out that there are no treatments for autism and then she> > asks for insurance coverage for treatments for autism. "> > What she said is there "Currently, there are no effective means to prevent> > autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except Applied Behavior> > Analysis (ABA), and no cure." I am not arguing the validity of the statement> > and of course anyone is free to disagree but stating there are no fully> > effective treatments is not the same as no treatments.> > As for the insurance issue, she argues for "mandating insurance coverage for> > evidence based treatments of autism." What I see here is possibly getting> > hung up on semantics. I read it as her arguing for covering all evidence> > based treatments whether or not is fully effective as is common in many> > medical treatments.> > I guess the million dollar question is what evidence based treatments would> > be argued for in a mandate. That is very worthy of further discussion and is> > something to be considered as discussions are held with legislators in variou> > states regarding future autism bills.> > Marty> > > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Since she didn't give us examples we can only guess what she means. I wish that someone in her position would focus on the difference between educational and medical interventions. From: "martinx2us" <martyx2@...>Reply-EOHarm To: EOHarm Subject: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:26:18 -0000 Heidi, you are absolutely correct in that AS can't be all things to everyone. But for sake of fairness, I think some of her comments are taken a bit out of context. You state "She points out that there are no treatments for autism and then she asks for insurance coverage for treatments for autism. " What she said is there "Currently, there are no effective means to prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure." I am not arguing the validity of the statement and of course anyone is free to disagree but stating there are no fully effective treatments is not the same as no treatments. As for the insurance issue, she argues for "mandating insurance coverage for evidence based treatments of autism." What I see here is possibly getting hung up on semantics. I read it as her arguing for covering all evidence based treatments whether or not is fully effective as is common in many medical treatments. I guess the million dollar question is what evidence based treatments would be argued for in a mandate. That is very worthy of further discussion and is something to be considered as discussions are held with legislators in variou states regarding future autism bills. Marty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 do the "cured" children still require any medical interventions? From: " Hooker" <brian@...>Reply-EOHarm To: EOHarm Subject: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:33:00 -0000 BTW - I think it would be best for Autism Speaks to be no things to no one... Their inability to fund relevant research means in essence they have a negative effect on the community - Sort of like the CDC using tax dollars to "prove" the hypothesis that there is no autism epidemic.> >> > > > Heidi, you are absolutely correct in that AS can't be all things to> > everyone. But for sake of fairness, I think some of her comments > are> > taken a bit out of context.> > > > You state "She points out that there are no treatments for autism> > and then she asks for insurance coverage for treatments for autism.> > "> > > > What she said is there "Currently, there are no effective means > to> > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except> > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure." I am not arguing > the> > validity of the statement and of course anyone is free to disagree > but> > stating there are no fully effective treatments is not the same as > no> > treatments.> > > > As for the insurance issue, she argues for "mandating insurance> > coverage for evidence based treatments of autism." What I see here> > is possibly getting hung up on semantics. I read it as her > arguing for> > covering all evidence based treatments whether or not is fully > effective> > as is common in many medical treatments.> > > > I guess the million dollar question is what evidence based > treatments> > would be argued for in a mandate. That is very worthy of further> > discussion and is something to be considered as discussions are > held> > with legislators in variou states regarding future autism bills.> > > > Marty> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Karyn Seroussi says, last I heard anyway, that her son is cured but still has to be gfcf. Debi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below is the testimony of Alison Tepper Singer before The > > > > Assembly > > > > > > > Standing Committee On Mental Health, Mental Retardation and > > > > > > Development > > > > > > > Disabilities and the Senate Standing Committee On Mental > > Health > > > > And > > > > > > > Developmental Disabilities on March 8, 2007. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have seen the many comments related thereto and > > apparently > > > > there > > > > > > > seems to be a disconnect on what was said. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On a related note I can add that the school Alison's > > daughter > > > > > attends > > > > > > > is on the NYS list of approved private schools. > > > Consequently, > > > > it > > > > > > is a > > > > > > > district paid programs for children who need an out of > > district > > > > > > > placement as a result of the CSE's determination that the > > needs > > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > child cannot be served in the local district or BOCES > > > program. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  MARCH 8, 2007 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TESTIMONY OF ALISON TEPPER SINGER > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > COMMUNICATIONS AND STRATEGY > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AUTISM SPEAKS > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BEFORE > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > THE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL > > > > RETARDATION > > > > > > > AND DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AND > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON MENTAL HEALTH AND > > DEVELOPMENTAL > > > > > > > DISABILITIES > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MARCH 8, 2007 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          Chairman and > > > > > > Chairman Morahan, thank you for > > > > > > > recognizing me and for holding this very important hearing > > > > today. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          My name is Alison > > > > > > Singer. I am a resident of Westchester > > > > > > > County and the Senior Vice President for Communications and > > > > Strategy > > > > > > at > > > > > > > Autism Speaks. Autism Speaks, the largest single > > > organization > > > > > > devoted > > > > > > > to autism in the country, was founded in February 2005 by > > Bob > > > > and > > > > > > > Suzanne of New York City who have a grandson > > affected by > > > > this > > > > > > > disorder. Over the last two years, we have joined forces > > > with > > > > > the > > > > > > > National Alliance for Autism Research and, very recently, > > Cure > > > > > Autism > > > > > > > Now. I am here on behalf of tens of thousands of parents > > and > > > > > > their > > > > > > > children who belong to our organization. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          I am also here on > > > > > behalf > > > > > > of Jodie Singer, my nine year-old > > > > > > > daughter, who suffers from autism, and Tepper, my 42 > > > > year old > > > > > > > brother with autism. Jodie truly is the sunshine in my > > life. > > > > She > > > > > > was > > > > > > > diagnosed at age 2 ½ and received early intervention > > > services > > > > > > through > > > > > > > the New York State Department of Health. She attended a > > > special > > > > > > > education preschool and then received special education > > > > services in > > > > > > > public school. However, her needs simply could not be met > > by > > > > the > > > > > > > public school system and she is currently enrolled in a > > private > > > > > school > > > > > > > for children with autism, where she is making good > > progress, > > > > because > > > > > > > there is staff trained to meet her unique learning needs. > > My > > > > brother > > > > > > > , a former victim of Willowbrook, is currently > > living in a > > > > > group > > > > > > > home in Rockland County, where he participates in a day > > program > > > > > > > delivering meals on wheels to home-bound citizens. In the > > > last > > > > > > few > > > > > > > years he has learned to swim and became toilet trained in > > his > > > > > > thirties, > > > > > > > proving that it is never too late to offer services to > > persons > > > > with > > > > > > > autism across their lifespan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          As you know, > > > Chairmen, > > > > > > my family is not alone in the struggle > > > > > > > with autism spectrum disorder. Every twenty minutes, > > another > > > > > > child is > > > > > > > diagnosed. According to the Centers for Disease Control > > and > > > > > > > Protection, 1 in 150 children are diagnosed with autism. > > That > > > > means > > > > > > > that in every grade in every public school in New York > > there is > > > > > likely > > > > > > > to be at least one child diagnosed with autism. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          Because of this > > > > > > epidemic, Autism Speaks pushed very hard for > > > > > > > passage of the Federal Combating Autism Act, which the > > President > > > > > > signed > > > > > > > into law in December. The CAA authorizes nearly one > > billion > > > > > > dollars to > > > > > > > fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services > > > > > > > Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into > > the > > > > > causes > > > > > > > of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence > > based > > > > > > > treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective > > > means > > > > > to > > > > > > > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based > > treatments > > > > except > > > > > > > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. It is our > > > fervent > > > > > > hope > > > > > > > that the CAA will help change that, and we urge the New > > York > > > > > > > legislature to act on a companion bill. Given the > > prevalence of > > > > > autism > > > > > > > spectrum disorders in the state, there is no reason that > > New > > > > York > > > > > > > should not be a research leader and respond to the huge > > demand > > > > for > > > > > > > evidence-based information regarding the education of > > > > individuals > > > > > with > > > > > > > autism. We are in desperate need of evidence-based > > > educational > > > > > > > treatments. What we have now are collections of > > > consensus-based > > > > > > best > > > > > > > practices. But without a research foundation, " best > > > > > > practices " often > > > > > > > amount to an exchange of testimonials and fads. With good > > > > > > marketing > > > > > > > strategies, any method or approach can become the next new > > hot > > > > > > therapy. > > > > > > >  School officials charged with the appropriation of > > limited > > > > > > resources > > > > > > > and expending public funds need to know what interventions > > are > > > > > likely > > > > > > > to work with students with specific profiles. The > > > opportunists > > > > > > that > > > > > > > are looking for a quick buck abound and are feeding on > > these > > > > > families' > > > > > > > " hopes " for quick answers or cures. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The No Child Left Behind Act and other such legislation > > > require > > > > > > schools > > > > > > > to attend to and sufficiently fund programs that will > > > > > promote > > > > > > academic > > > > > > > skills. On the other hand, programs and opportunities that > > > > allow > > > > > > for > > > > > > > the development of life skills are being > > > reduced. > > > > > > Traditional " shop " > > > > > > > programs seen at the high school level, for example, have > > become > > > > > > > " technologized " to the point that an understanding of > > computer > > > > > > > technology and physics is required. Hence, as school > > > > > > districts ratchet > > > > > > > up their education programs, young adults with autism and > > other > > > > > > related > > > > > > > disabilities are being further disadvantaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Research based programs are needed to help guide school > > > > districts in > > > > > > > program development and implementation, as well as in > > program > > > > > > design. > > > > > > > Funding needs to be earmarked to help establish centers > > that > > > > will > > > > > > > develop basic competencies in those individuals for whom > > > > college is > > > > > > not > > > > > > > in the future but who have the capability to be functional > > > > > members > > > > > > in > > > > > > > our communities. Such centers need to include career > > > counselors > > > > > > and > > > > > > > placement services. Finally, with the number of children > > > with > > > > > > autism > > > > > > > rising and more and more of those children being educated > > in > > > > > > mainstream > > > > > > > public school classes, teacher training for all mainstream > > > > teachers > > > > > > > regarding how to work appropriately with students with > > autism is > > > > > > > necessary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >          But funding > > > educational > > > > > > research is just a first step. > > > > > > > Please allow me to suggest several other areas that your > > > > committees > > > > > > may > > > > > > > want to consider: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ·       First, families that are > > > > > > affected by autism need insurance > > > > > > > coverage. By and large, insurance companies do not > > reimburse > > > > > > parents > > > > > > > for the diagnosis, treatment, and services associated with > > > > spectrum > > > > > > > disorders. At Autism Speaks, we do not believe in > > > competition > > > > in > > > > > > human > > > > > > > misery. But while health plans cover the broken legs and > > > broken > > > > > > arms > > > > > > > of healthy kids, they do not cover the costs of treating a > > child > > > > > with > > > > > > > autism. That's just plain wrong. You have the > > > opportunity to > > > > > > change > > > > > > > that by mandating insurance coverage for evidence based > > > > treatments > > > > > of > > > > > > > autism. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ·       Second, New York should > > > become > > > > > a > > > > > > leader in providing services > > > > > > > to families who live with autism. One of Autism Speaks' > > > highest > > > > > > > priorities in Washington this year will be a follow-on to > > the > > > > > > Combating > > > > > > > Autism Act in the form of a state grant program to fund > > > > services and > > > > > > > treatment programs. We urge you to get ahead of Congress > > and > > > > > pass > > > > > > > legislation that will allocate resources to ensure that > > people > > > > > > > suffering from ASD can be meaningful members of their > > > > communities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ·       Third, although not > > > necessarily > > > > > > in the purview of your > > > > > > > committees, we strongly recommend revisions to the tax > > code that > > > > > would > > > > > > > benefit families with autistic children. Mothers and > > fathers > > > > > will > > > > > > not > > > > > > > be around forever, and without a cure, autism will stay > > with > > > > someone > > > > > > > for life. We can use the tax laws to fund pre-tax accounts > > > that > > > > > > allow > > > > > > > parents to provide for their kids, just as mothers and > > fathers > > > > can > > > > > > save > > > > > > > for college educations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ·       Finally, there is great > > > concern > > > > > > among families of children > > > > > > > with autism that New York State Ed's interpretation of the > > > > > Individuals > > > > > > > with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA) will > > mean > > > > that > > > > > > > children whose school districts cannot provide appropriate > > > > > placements > > > > > > > within the district and who have to attend school outside > > of > > > > their > > > > > > home > > > > > > > district will no longer be the responsibility of the school > > > > district > > > > > > in > > > > > > > which their parents reside and pay taxes, but rather the > > school > > > > > > > district in which the new school the child attends is > > physically > > > > > > > located. For example, if I live in Scarsdale and my > > daughter > > > > > > attends > > > > > > > an autism program at a school in Eastchester, > > responsibility for > > > > > > > reviewing her annual progress and evaluating her ongoing > > needs > > > > is > > > > > > > transferred to Eastchester, which may or may not decide > > that > > > > > > > Eastchester is even appropriate. While I understand that > > this > > > > > > provision > > > > > > > was implemented as part of the Child Find program, it will > > have > > > > > > > devastating consequences for families and children, and > > will > > > > result > > > > > in > > > > > > > decreased accountability for the education of the most > > fragile > > > > of > > > > > > > children. It also places an undue burden on the districts > > that > > > > have > > > > > > > stepped up and created appropriate programs for children > > with > > > > > autism. > > > > > > I > > > > > > > urge you to recommend that State Education not implement > > this > > > > > change. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chairman and Chairman Morahan, Members of both > > > > Committees, > > > > > > thank > > > > > > > you again for the opportunity to testify today. All of us > > at > > > > > > Autism > > > > > > > Speaks look forward to working with you on responding to > > the > > > > urgent > > > > > > > health crisis in autism. We stand ready to help you in all > > > of > > > > > > your > > > > > > > efforts. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 > > Has anyone seen him and Chen of the CDC at the same place at > the same time?... Hmmm..... > These racial stereotypes really makes my Polish blood boil. Lenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 While some may argue about IF she said anything about genetics, In her written testimony, Ms. Singer states: The CAA authorizes nearly one billion dollars to fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. I personally think these two statements are a declaration of war against anyone who believes in the mercury/vaccine linkage, as well as anyone who adheres to a biomedical approach to helping their children. If this is where AS/CAN stands, then there are a lot of parents and caregivers in their sights. Harry Hofherr AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Don't let it boil too long Lenny. I'm not really a fan of Polish blood sausage... > > > > Has anyone seen him and Chen of the CDC at the same place at > > the same time?... Hmmm..... > > > > These racial stereotypes really makes my Polish blood boil. > > Lenny > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Autism Speaks should continue to show/educate people on how many autistic children there are. After that, if they can't speak without corrupting the research and issues- they should just say nothing. Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007 BTW - I think it would be best for Autism Speaks to be no things to no one... Their inability to fund relevant research means in essence they have a negative effect on the community - Sort of like the CDC using tax dollars to "prove" the hypothesis that there is no autism epidemic.> >> > > > Heidi, you are absolutely correct in that AS can't be all things to> > everyone. But for sake of fairness, I think some of her comments > are> > taken a bit out of context.> > > > You state "She points out that there are no treatments for autism> > and then she asks for insurance coverage for treatments for autism.> > "> > > > What she said is there "Currently, there are no effective means > to> > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except> > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure." I am not arguing > the> > validity of the statement and of course anyone is free to disagree > but> > stating there are no fully effective treatments is not the same as > no> > treatments.> > > > As for the insurance issue, she argues for "mandating insurance> > coverage for evidence based treatments of autism." What I see here> > is possibly getting hung up on semantics. I read it as her > arguing for> > covering all evidence based treatments whether or not is fully > effective> > as is common in many medical treatments.> > > > I guess the million dollar question is what evidence based > treatments> > would be argued for in a mandate. That is very worthy of further> > discussion and is something to be considered as discussions are > held> > with legislators in variou states regarding future autism bills.> > > > Marty> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Yup - that should require about $100. What to do with their remaining $11 million annual operating budget? Disburse it to parents who can't make ends meet? > > > > > > > > > Heidi, you are absolutely correct in that AS can't be all things > to > > > everyone. But for sake of fairness, I think some of her > comments > > are > > > taken a bit out of context. > > > > > > You state " She points out that there are no treatments for autism > > > and then she asks for insurance coverage for treatments for > autism. > > > " > > > > > > What she said is there " Currently, there are no effective > means > > to > > > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments > except > > > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. " I am not arguing > > the > > > validity of the statement and of course anyone is free to > disagree > > but > > > stating there are no fully effective treatments is not the same > as > > no > > > treatments. > > > > > > As for the insurance issue, she argues for " mandating insurance > > > coverage for evidence based treatments of autism. " What I see > here > > > is possibly getting hung up on semantics. I read it as her > > arguing for > > > covering all evidence based treatments whether or not is fully > > effective > > > as is common in many medical treatments. > > > > > > I guess the million dollar question is what evidence based > > treatments > > > would be argued for in a mandate. That is very worthy of further > > > discussion and is something to be considered as discussions are > > held > > > with legislators in variou states regarding future autism bills. > > > > > > Marty > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 I thought it was an allusion to Austin Powers and mini-me. Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007 >> Has anyone seen him and Chen of the CDC at the same place at > the same time?... Hmmm.....> These racial stereotypes really makes my Polish blood boil.Lenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Absolutely. At least it will be used for something useful. I guess the same advice applies to both Congress and Autism Speaks. Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007 Yup - that should require about $100. What to do with their remaining $11 million annual operating budget? Disburse it to parents who can't make ends meet?> > >> > > > > > Heidi, you are absolutely correct in that AS can't be all things > to> > > everyone. But for sake of fairness, I think some of her > comments > > are> > > taken a bit out of context.> > > > > > You state "She points out that there are no treatments for autism> > > and then she asks for insurance coverage for treatments for > autism.> > > "> > > > > > What she said is there "Currently, there are no effective > means > > to> > > prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments > except> > > Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure." I am not arguing > > the> > > validity of the statement and of course anyone is free to > disagree > > but> > > stating there are no fully effective treatments is not the same > as > > no> > > treatments.> > > > > > As for the insurance issue, she argues for "mandating insurance> > > coverage for evidence based treatments of autism." What I see > here> > > is possibly getting hung up on semantics. I read it as her > > arguing for> > > covering all evidence based treatments whether or not is fully > > effective> > > as is common in many medical treatments.> > > > > > I guess the million dollar question is what evidence based > > treatments> > > would be argued for in a mandate. That is very worthy of further> > > discussion and is something to be considered as discussions are > > held> > > with legislators in variou states regarding future autism bills.> > > > > > Marty> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 You know, I sat there and listened to about 30-40 people speak. There were a few who kept saying “evidence based treatments” and how ABA is the only thing that works and it’s just NOT true. ABA (trials or vb) does not work with every child Some people can’t find good ABA therapists And Biomed has done more for my child then the crappy ABA he did get when he was little (a few hours a week) His school based program has worked VERY well- but it’s not true “ABA” and he definitely doesn’t do trials. (lots of d’s in that statement) I’ve said this a million times- when we took gluten, casein and soy out of my son’s diet he stopped rubbing his face on the floor slept thru the night never got another ear infection better eye contact and language But let’s not TEST these diets! It’s freggin’ child abuse to have something that MAY work and with hold that information from parents. I do my best to spread the word- but people just don’t get that you need a balance when it comes to the kids— oh ya- and the research has to be balanced too. Again- preaching to the choir here On 3/12/07 9:38 AM, " hhofher@... " <hhofher@...> wrote: While some may argue about IF she said anything about genetics, In her written testimony, Ms. Singer states: The CAA authorizes nearly one billion dollars to fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. I personally think these two statements are a declaration of war against anyone who believes in the mercury/vaccine linkage, as well as anyone who adheres to a biomedical approach to helping their children. If this is where AS/CAN stands, then there are a lot of parents and caregivers in their sights. Harry Hofherr AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000339> . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 What's TRUTH got to do with it? Re: Re: NYS Albany Hearing 3/8/2007 You know, I sat there and listened to about 30-40 people speak. There were a few who kept saying “evidence based treatments” and how ABA is the only thing that works and it’s just NOT true.ABA (trials or vb) does not work with every childSome people can’t find good ABA therapistsAnd Biomed has done more for my child then the crappy ABA he did get when he was little (a few hours a week)His school based program has worked VERY well- but it’s not true “ABA” and he definitely doesn’t do trials. (lots of d’s in that statement)I’ve said this a million times- when we took gluten, casein and soy out of my son’s diet he stopped rubbing his face on the floor slept thru the night never got another ear infection better eye contact and languageBut let’s not TEST these diets! It’s freggin’ child abuse to have something that MAY work and with hold that information from parents.I do my best to spread the word- but people just don’t get that you need a balance when it comes to the kids— oh ya- and the research has to be balanced too. Again- preaching to the choir here :)On 3/12/07 9:38 AM, "hhofheraol" <hhofheraol> wrote: While some may argue about IF she said anything about genetics, In her written testimony, Ms. Singer states: The CAA authorizes nearly one billion dollars to fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. I personally think these two statements are a declaration of war against anyone who believes in the mercury/vaccine linkage, as well as anyone who adheres to a biomedical approach to helping their children. If this is where AS/CAN stands, then there are a lot of parents and caregivers in their sights. Harry Hofherr AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000339> . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2007 Report Share Posted March 12, 2007 Harry, I fully agree, but the war was declared long ago – CAA was a battle along the way, and the assaults continue. This is a mere reiteration of the attacks on our reality and experience with our kids that are longstanding. Also, praise for the Combating Autism Act in the context of the NYS hearing was truly beside the point. The Combating Autism Act has no funding for the near future. How does it address issues like those so well presented by the Careys? The CAA's importance continues to be inflated as a means to address the problems our kids face. Also, the evidence on ABA is decidedly mixed as a treatment. If research money were dedicated to other treatments we would have more evidence, and there does exist evidence supporting other treatments. Treatments for autistic enterocolitis are helping many children. Thanks for pointing this out so clearly. Bob K. On Mar 12, 2007, at 9:38 AM, hhofher@... wrote: While some may argue about IF she said anything about genetics, In her written testimony, Ms. Singer states: The CAA authorizes nearly one billion dollars to fund research at the CDC, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the National Institutes of Health into the causes of autism, including environmental factors, and evidence based treatments for autism. Currently, there are no effective means to prevent autism, no fully effective evidence based treatments except Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), and no cure. I personally think these two statements are a declaration of war against anyone who believes in the mercury/vaccine linkage, as well as anyone who adheres to a biomedical approach to helping their children. If this is where AS/CAN stands, then there are a lot of parents and caregivers in their sights. Harry Hofherr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.