Guest guest Posted January 30, 2007 Report Share Posted January 30, 2007 "...Hallmayer, who studies the genetic causes of autism, said parents whose children have the disease would benefit from greater insights into the scientific process. "I think a better understanding of what we consider to be evidence and not evidence would help the publicunderstand what they can expect out of scientific research," he said." Maybe the researchers would benefit from greater insights into the process by watching a normally developing child, let's say at the age of 18 to 24 months, suddenly looses his ability to speak, his ability to walk or run with the other kids at the playground, his ability to digest foods without the roller coaster of constipation and diarrhea, and his ability to think without a cacophony of noise constantly pounding in his head. If researchers took the time to listen to the parents, many of whom are well educated researchers as well, and consider the evidence of harm that has been caused, they might understand why parents are realizing that the medical industry is senselessly forfeiting their scientific credibility. Researchers can begin by opening a dictionary and looking up the word, IATROGENIC. That's the best place to begin researching the causes of autism. Harry H. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.