Guest guest Posted November 13, 2006 Report Share Posted November 13, 2006 , Don't know....but do know that ASA is in support of the bill....and they recently " merged " with ARI....so IF he is, that certainly didn't stop them from merging.... Gosh....guess they can " agree to disagree " and still work together -- now THAT'S what I consider to be a prime example to be filed under the " mutual respect for differing viewpoints " category! Kelli > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating Autism Act. Is this still the case? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2006 Report Share Posted November 13, 2006 Kelli Ann, CAA has nothing to do with " mutual respect for differing viewpoints " and everything to do with critical thinking, strategy and acting in the best interests of children not organizations. I respect your right to have a different opinion if that opinion only affects you but when an organization claims to represent the " autism " community without regard to a large majority then it becomes something other than a mere difference of opinion. By the way, the merger was announced after it appeared the CAA was a dead issue because it did not get to the floor of the House. So your analysis is not quite on point. But I have to give your points for trying...it was a nice example of grasping at straws. Lujene The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating Autism Act. Is this still the case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2006 Report Share Posted November 13, 2006 Lujene, The CAA has never been a " dead issue " ....ASA has been very much involved in the negotiations and would know this.... Any issue (CAA included) is bound to have a whole host of " differing opinions " on " what should be done " ....to think otherwise, is unrealistic....and as you know, there are organizations on BOTH sides of this issue.... So, yes. Mutual respect for differing opinions has EVERYTHING to do with CAA. Kelli PS....I'm not about to get into a " debate " with you or anyone else on the merits of CAA.... Translation: End of subject for me > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating Autism > Act. Is this still the case? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 Kelli, ARI and ASA did not merge. What they have is essentially a joint marketing agreement. They are still two independent organizations that do not share any board or corporate members. Dr. Rimland has not changed his opposition to the CAA. Lenny > > > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating > Autism Act. Is this still the case? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 Kelliann, You are clearly an advocate of CAA who has had an initimate role in the negotiations. Perhaps you can answer some of the questions I have asked that no one has responded to yet. Like: What do we lose by waiting a few weeks and dealing with the democrats who are going to have to appropriate the money for this bill anyway. Especially now that I hear that ASA, AS and CAN are willing to abandon the language and funding for environmental research. And do you know if $10 million has been earmarked for ATN/CAN? I have heard this form severla differnet sources? > > > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating > Autism > > Act. Is this still the case? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 Hi , ASA, AS and CAN have all fought to keep environmental language and funding in the bill for months. Other than that, I think you'd agree it's unwise to discuss ongoing negotiations on Boards. Best, > > > > > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating > > Autism > > > Act. Is this still the case? > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 Hello , CAN never wanted the environmental language in the CAA in the first place and the ASA was the first to annouce in advance that they were would be happy with a compromise to remove it. And AS won't show it's hand -- we're supposed to trust this mix of advocates? I detest the backroom secret deal mentality that got us a malfunctional CAA in the first place. There should be no negotiations going on now until the next congress anyway. 's questions are legitimate. And why shouldn't they be discussed here, where else are we going to hear about it before it's too late, again? How dumb and trusting are we suppose to be, ? Lenny > > > > > > > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating > > > Autism > > > > Act. Is this still the case? > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 , With all due respect, why would it be unwise to discuss ongoing negotiations on CAA, when this board is full of parents that are weary that the outcome of this bill will not have our children's best interests at heart? I think that if there is a better chance of getting the environmental language in the bill by waiting, regardless of efforts and egos, then wait. > > > > > > > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating > > > Autism > > > > Act. Is this still the case? > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 Hi , No one has given me an answer, or even attempted to discuss, why taking our chances with the Democrats is a bad thing. Maybe there are some really good reasons why we get a better deal with Barton. I haven't heard anything one way or the other. And the environmental research is one of the prime reasons some people have stayed at the table all these months, and this is clearly something Barton and the GOP leadership want off the table. I don't have to tell you that there are profound differences of opinon among the various groups. There are people involved in this whose judgment and values I respect and others who I don't and I believe this is a widely shared opinon in the bio-medical autism community. This bill has been brewing for years. I don't understand the haste to pass it during this session with an overtly hostile committee chair. If CAN has a substantial financial incentive, the $10 million earmarked for ATN, that could explain some of the haste. But I don't know if that is true or not. Other people who read this list do know but they aren't saying. The proliferation of autism groups has a great deal to do with the frosty reception we received when we tried to get the issues we consider important addressed by CAN, NAAR and ASA. SO I don't think it comes as a surprise to anyone that many will be wary of negotiations lead by these groups. > > > > > > > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating > > > Autism > > > > Act. Is this still the case? > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2006 Report Share Posted November 14, 2006 What is of great concern to me, are the groups, who publicly OPPOSED the removal of Thimerosal/vaccine language (ACHAMP, NoMercury,MAM, and CoMeD), were immediately eliminated from all discussions, conference calls etc. These groups firmly held their ground on the ORIGINAL agreed upon consensus bill. Because of their allegiance to the status quo, they were made to feel like " traitors " were cast aside, penalized and completely removed from the table. Lujene and Bob K. were asking the hard " uncomfortable " questions, furious the language had been hidden in the coveted colloquy. Their voices have been stifled, just like our children. Who is driving this train? (Last time I was involved, CAN was at the controls). Who is asking the hard questions today? Exactly who is demanding answers? Why were groups eliminated because they NEVER WAIVERED on the Thimerosal/vaccine issue? > > > > > > > > > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating > > > > Autism > > > > > Act. Is this still the case? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2006 Report Share Posted November 15, 2006 To piggyback that statement from Lenny - Kelli: Not sure what your involvement with the ASA is, but it has been told to we chapter leaders that it is separate and that Dr. Edelson will continue on Dr. Rimland's place taking on more and more responsibility. Basically look at this way: Rimland started the ASA. He's getting ready to ride into the sunset and maybe have a few years of relaxation. The least the ASA could do at this point in the game, at least to save face, was to say to Bernie " Hey we'll be there to support you and all the work you've done and to say thanks for the memories " . It's nothing more than a handshake and salute to Bernie and a saving face gesture on the part of the ASA who, once all the truth gets out there to everyone about their part in the CAA, to save their membership. I for one am personally ashamed of all that has happened with this CAA and I just wish someone would shred the bill once and for all. I have been a chapter leader with the ASA for 10 years and am about to end that in January. I am now running my own business advocating for autism and being a support broker to aide families in NY state with the Medicaid Waiver. I will continue to proudly represent the 22nd district in NY state for A-Champ,with honest guys like Gilmore and Bob Krakow. Just wait and see the changes that will continue to occur in NY and how we may just become the model state for autism legislation - we're pissed off and we're not gonna take it anymore! Sally Colletti www.advocateforautism.com www.achamp.org > > > > > > The last I heard Bernie Rimland was opposed to the Combating > > Autism Act. Is this still the case? > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.