Re: Re: IMVA - Another Poison Pediatricians; aluminum question

[Guest guest]

I realize that this is getting OT, but the Prevnar vaccine label states that it "has never been tested for its impact on sterility or for its carcinogenic effects." Does anyone know if the sterility warning is due to aluminum and is it really enough to sterilize babies? Obviously I know that it is not a good idea to inject anyone in any quantity with aluminum. Can you imagine if we have sterilized almost every baby born since that vaccine was introduced in 2000? I have been wondering about that. Verarobbiev911 <robbiev911@...> wrote: -I don't really think everyone only thinks mercury is the entire problem. I think everyone feels it was the origional problem. We know that the alum heats up the

mercury making it 10x more toxic. Hep-b at birth had both mercury and alum. The testimony of Lilly reps.I viewed stated.The target areas for thimerisol were the brain and it's coverings, The liver, possible infertility. Bleezard went on to say that the purpose of the thimerisol was to prevent excetion and metabolism of the virus, thus allowing longer immunity.A tad bit incriminating I'd say. The thimerisol is holding the virus inside the cells. I think this is where most are coming from.I am glad you posted the study.Thank you,Dot-- In EOHarm , "Mark Sircus Ac., OMD" <director@...> wrote:>> What surprises me, is that this article appeared> here tonight, upon the heels of news from Dr. Shaw, in Canada,> that aluminum hydroxide may be a contributor to various neurological> disorders such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and ALS. What gives

here?> Aasa> > > Aasa, what gives is just more attention being placed on this important > vaccine subject. Some people live with the hallucination that the principle > issue is mercury and thing all our problems will be resolved with its > removal. That is simply not the truth.> > Mark>