Guest guest Posted August 7, 2006 Report Posted August 7, 2006 I read FSMA's update on their initiative to promote newborn screening for SMA. I have always been a bit puzzled by this push to get SMA on the list of diseases which are automatically offered to expecting parents. Since there is presently no treatment for SMA, what are parents supposed to do with this information except possibly consider abortion? Why would a SMA parent support group be working to reduce the incidence of SMA by promoting abortion of disabled kids? Am I the only one who noticed this? I recall that when we were getting the ultrasound and stuff for before she was born we were offered a screening for downs syndrome. Of course, at that time we had no idea would be born with SMA, but an optional screening for downs syndrome is apparently offered by law. We opted not to have that test done because we figured we'd just deal with whatever came along. A couple years later, I remember reading somewhere that the incidence of people with downs syndrome has dramatically declined since 1980 due to newborn screening. This was hailed as a triumph of modern science. Do I understand this right? Does FSMA want to reduce SMA by making sure fewer kids with SMA even get to be born? I am not necessarily an anti-abortion person, but does anyone else find this rather macabre? Why aren't the people from " Not Dead Yet " out protesting this? Just wondering, Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.