Guest guest Posted August 15, 2001 Report Share Posted August 15, 2001 Dear Group, A person sent me a thread from Saul Pressman's group (ozonetherapy) in which the person (Dave) asks Mr. Pressman a question regarding our Water Ozonator Model WOZ3. Here is that thread and Mr. Pressman's response: [Dave states: " The WOZ3... is supposed to take about 10 minutes to saturate a 10-12 oz. glass of water. " Saul Pressman's response is: " Don't believe it. It hasn't got the output. " ] My response to Mr. Pressman's response follows below. Initially Dave and another person from that group () e-mailed me with great concern about Mr. Pressman's response stating that our ozonator is essentially " worthless " . I replied to these two people (Dave and ) with my same response below. I asked them to post my reply in Mr. Pressman's group (ozonetherapy) so the rest of the group members could read my response. Neither one of those posts were accepted by Mr. Pressman and therefore did not appear on the list. I then went to Mr. Pressman's e-group (ozonetherapy) and joined the group myself. When my membership was granted, I then proceeded to post my reply. My reply did not get posted either. In addition, today I find that my membership in Mr. Pressman's group (ozonetherapy) has been revoked! It appears that Mr. Pressman has decided to censor what is posted to his group (ozonetherapy) and restrict its members to a select few. Because it was very important to me to respond to Mr. Pressman's false and misleading information about our WOZ3 ozonator, I have decided to post my reply to this e-group in the hopes that it will be read, and not censored. I am very disturbed by what has transgressed here, and I see now that chat groups that are moderated by individuals with a self-serving agenda or with a conflict of interest is a disservice to those members of the groups, and prevents the TRUTH from being brought forth. ******************************************************* Here then is my response to Mr. Pressman's statement: " I would like to respond to Saul Pressman's statement regarding our WOZ3 water ozonator. In Saul's e-mail, states " The WOZ3... is supposed to take about 10 minutes to saturate a 10-12 oz. glass of water. " Saul's response is: " Don't believe it. It hasn't got the output. " I must say that Saul is completely incorrect in his reply. In fact, he is giving out totally false and misleading information. Our WOZ3 water ozonator was tested at Ozone Service's (www.ozoneservices.com) by Den Rasplika for both ozone output in mg/Hr and for Oxidation- Reduction Potential (ORP) in mV. The mg/Hr testing was done using a GM Anceros Ozone-in-Air analyzer. Our WOZ3 outputs 108mg/Hr @ 1.5LPM. The ORP teats were done with one of Den's high performance ORP probes. The water used was steam- distilled and I added ice cubes to the water to maintain a constant 2 degrees C. Our website shows the ORP readings over time. Basically, we achieved over 1,000mV ORP in less than 5 minutes in 8 ounces of the chilled water. Now, regardless of Saul's subjective statements, science is science. With a 1,000mV ORP this proves emphatically that ozone indeed was mass transferred to the water through our WOZ3 ozonator, as there was nothing else that could raise the ORP except the ozone. Secondly, the ORP reading reached a maximum of 1,000mV and this level was sustained. Thirdly, since the 1,000mV ORP was sustained well beyond a 5 minute period, it indicates that the chilled water had indeed saturated with ozone to the highest amount that it could with the output ozone concentration of the WOZ3. In other words, I could not measure an increase in the ORP reading once the water reached the 1,000mV level even after 10 minutes. This then showed me that the highest concentration of ozone that I could put into the water with our WOZ3 unit was the equivalent of what would give me a reading of 1,000mV. Now, with a higher output (oxygen-fed) ozonator, then a higher mV ORP reading would be realized and the ozone saturation level in the water would of course be higher. Medical-grade, oxygen ozonators (those costing thousands of dollars) will indeed saturate water to a much higher concentration of ozone by virtue of the fact that they output a higher concentration of ozone in the first place. This is simple science. To go on and say that our WOZ3 unit cannot saturate the water with ozone is a ridiculous and false statement. The saturation level is a indicator of the amount of ozone that can be put into the water. And this level increases with higher and higher output ozonators. For example, ozonators are regularly used in aquariums to keep the fish alive. These low concentration ozonators (like our WOZ3, as compared to an oxygen-fed medical ozonator) saturate the water with a specific level of ozone. If they did not work (i.e. saturate the water with ozone to a specific level) THEN THE FISH WOULD DIE. It is a shame that Saul continues to compare our $360 air-fed ozonator with oxygen-fed, medical-grade ozonators that cost $1,800 - $5,000. This is a ridiculous comparison to make. They are two completely different units. Each serves a purpose. To make unfair comparisons like what has been done, is a disservice to all. In essence what it says is that unless you are willing to pay $1,800 dollars or much more for a full-blown oxygen-fed ozonator, then you are wasting your time with any other ozonator. This is totally erroneous and self-serving. If a person wishes to simply ozonate their water in order to reap the benefits like that which Dr. Beck has discovered, then our WOZ3 unit is the perfect ozonator for you. If you wish to advance your ozone therapies with insulflation, etc. then you should definitely research high-quality medical-grade, oxygen-fed ozonators like those designed by Ozone Services, and others as non-oxygen-fed ozonators are simply not designed for advanced medical therapies. Our WOZ3 ozonator is designed to: 1) raise the oxygen level of the water by saturating the water with as much ozone as physics will allow the unit to saturate the water, given its ozone output of 108 mg/Hr @ 1.5LPM flowrate. 2) Kill water-based pathogens such as E.Coli (Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 [ESC]), Staph. (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 [sAU]), and Pseudomonas (Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027 [PAS]) as was proven by our WOZ3 unit being tested by an FDA registered laboratory. Our 100% kill test result of these 3 pathogens is available on our website. 3) Utilize this saturated ozone water to help breakdown potential toxins in the body to help take this load off the body as it detox's during the use of the Beck protocols. Again, science is science. We at SOTA use pure science to test our unit's safety and effectiveness. We do not make subjective statements in place of real science. Our main goals here at SOTA are to: 1) Advance the State-Of-The-Art (SOTA) of these and other alternative health protocols. 2) Provide the finest, most reliable units at an extremely affordable price. 3) Provide Customer Service second to none. 4) Provide the greatest amount of information available to ensure potential Customers are fully informed on our products prior to making a purchase. 5) Do our best to advance our knowledge base. 6) Pursue Government Licensing on our products requiring such to help ensure longevity of alternative health protocols. To date we have received a Medical Class II license for our Silver Pulser, Magnetic Pulser, and Bio-Tuner. Exempt from licensing are the Water Ozonator, and our Silver Maker. SOTA is founded on honesty, integrity, and truthfulness. Should you have any other concerns with our products, their performance, and/or their specifications please do not hesitate to contact me or one of our helpful Customer Service Staff. Sincerely, J. Torlage, CTech SOTA Instruments Inc. Canada Tel: 250-814-0048 Fax: 250-814-0047 E-Mail: russ@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.