Guest guest Posted March 28, 2006 Report Posted March 28, 2006 In a message dated 29/03/2006 12:34:04 GMT Daylight Time, m_d33@... writes: The e-mail address is contact@... I believe it is an indication of what is in the body, rather than what is being excreted. >>>I think tina said its n idication of whats int he kidneys which may be an indiction of whats in the body. Its not measureing whats in the brain or the bones as far as I can make out Mandi x Quote
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2006 Report Posted March 29, 2006 Hi Di This is the E mail address to contact them. I am still awaiting my results back, takes about 2 weeks for the results. contact@... Kay. urinary porphyrin profile > Hi > I know quite a few of you have done this test. What were the results > like? Is it a better indicator of what is actually in the body > compared to hair test? > The phone number I tried on the back of the leaflet I got in Edinburgh > is not working, do you have a number or email to call. thanks Di x > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER > No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical > advice. If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably > qualified practitioner. > > Quote
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2006 Report Posted March 29, 2006 Hi Di, The e-mail address is contact@... I believe it is an indication of what is in the body, rather than what is being excreted. Diane urinary porphyrin profile HiI know quite a few of you have done this test. What were the results like? Is it a better indicator of what is actually in the body compared to hair test?The phone number I tried on the back of the leaflet I got in Edinburgh is not working, do you have a number or email to call. thanks Di x Quote
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2006 Report Posted March 29, 2006 >Hello Di Look under the files section - test results where we have posted the three lots of results from this lab. From what we understand it is the last three results which are most significant, believe they indicate readings of mercury and lead. As we understand it, this is an indication of the amount of lead and mercury in the reserve - generally in kidneys. Our test results would indicate this reserve has declined over the past six months when we have been chelating and is now empty. When (seems like if) we start chelating again (have been off due to protracted illnesses) and the 'gradient effect' of removal of Lead and mercury from the brain by TDDMPS - according to resident scientist - starts to take effect,we might see the amount in the reserve go up again. This should hopefully reduce as we continue to chelate. Our supplementation with Humet every second day also chelates heavy metals but at same time supplements with minerals. For reasons which I don't understand (but the resident scientist does) Humet has some kind of mechanism whereby, if a specific mineral is not required, it is not released. Regarding this being a better test - who knows? Breakspear don't seem to set much store by hair tests (correct me if I'm wrong?) but they also caution that this test is very new ( but then isn't everthing we are doing?) HTH Rhona > Hi > I know quite a few of you have done this test. What were the results > like? Is it a better indicator of what is actually in the body > compared to hair test? > The phone number I tried on the back of the leaflet I got in Edinburgh > is not working, do you have a number or email to call. thanks Di x > Quote
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2006 Report Posted March 29, 2006 harebigears skrev: >Hi >I know quite a few of you have done this test. What were the results >like? > I have facilitated - helped patients have the test done and interpret results, with results as expected..... > Is it a better indicator of what is actually in the body >compared to hair test? > > No one knows, there is very litle standardized and recognized standards both in the provocation testing, and less for urinary porphyrins, And Lab Philippe have not showed any comparing studies, that compare how the two tests can be evaluated / -- what differences would mean.. The pros of the test is that it is " easier " than a provocation test, -- but then the provocation gives you a chelating effect.... Geir Flatabø >The phone number I tried on the back of the leaflet I got in Edinburgh >is not working, do you have a number or email to call. thanks Di x > > > > > > >DISCLAIMER >No information contained in this post is to be construed as medical advice. If you need medical advice, please seek it from a suitably qualified practitioner. > > Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.