Guest guest Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Building for -Clyde studentscould have mold problem, lab finds BY DIETTE COURRÉGÉ The Post and Courier ton Post Courier - ton,SC http://www.charleston.net/stories/?newsID=90941 & section=localnews A lab report paid for by a downtown constituent school board member shows potentially toxic mold growing inside the Archer school building, but the district superintendent promised Wednesday to have the issue resolved before students occupy the facility. Henry Copeland used $240 of his own money for the Center for Indoor Air Research at Texas Tech University to analyze six swabs of mold from the building where -Clyde Elementary School students will move next school year while their new school is built. Copeland commissioned the study because the ton County School District didn't, even after the constituent board formally requested one; and he and the constituent board members wanted to ensure the building's safety, he said. ton County schools Superintendent Goodloe- said the report didn't give district employees any information they didn't already know, but she hadn't seen the report obtained by Copeland. She said Copeland is trying to derail the new building project, but that she isn't going to let him. Copeland said that isn't true, and that it was irresponsible for the district not to have done the report. The school district has renovated the vacant Archer school building for the last three years, and the work included replacing part of the roof where water leaked. Straus, a microbiology professor who oversees the Texas lab that tested the Archer samples, said he suspected the building had water damage. The most dangerous toxic mold that was found in two samples from Archer isn't normally found in buildings unless it's growing somewhere, and the water-damaged areas of the building need to be rechecked, he said. He said the type of mold found can kill animals in certain doses, and it's not one he'd want in a building where people lived or worked. Straus, who doesn't know Copeland and has never seen the Archer building, recommended further investigation of the facility to determine the seriousness of the mold problem. " Not to do it would be foolish on their part, " Straus said. Straus said he couldn't tell from the samples whether the mold was producing toxins, and if it was, whether the building contained a dangerous amount of toxins. Copeland wasn't trained in collecting the samples, and he could have missed swabbing key areas where mold was growing, Straus said. In addition, the lab analyzed only swabbed surface samples but not the air, so he said he doesn't know what's in the air at the school. The lab report indicates problems exit but doesn't mean the building is unsafe, he said. The school district typically tests school buildings for mold if people see signs of growth or if people complain about health problems linked to mold. ton Progressive Elementary School students temporarily occupied the Archer building before this year, and no one complained of such problems, said Mark Cobb, executive director of facility services for the school district. The lab report comes as the latest in a string of battles involving -Clyde, a longtime failing school that has shown great academic promise the last two years. The constituent board first opposed -Clyde students moving temporarily to the Archer building because they weren't guaranteed a new school building. That issue was resolved when the county school board decided to add a new -Clyde school to the current building program. Residents and parents also have argued the Archer building is too small, and is unsafe and lacks sufficient technology infrastructure. But they want students to remain together while the new school is built. The only alternative to moving students to the Archer school building is for -Clyde students to be dispersed among downtown schools, and that's an option the school principal and the PTA president said they didn't want. " We've worked too hard to keep this family together, " said school Principal Mia . " No one wants to move, but how are we going to get a new school if we don't? " Cobb said the building would be tested for mold before students moved into it next school year, but he would have to wait until mid- July, when the remaining renovations are scheduled to finish, before doing those tests. Reach Diette Courrégé at 937-5546 or dcourrege@.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.