Guest guest Posted April 19, 2006 Report Share Posted April 19, 2006 Award bumped to more than $1 million in case of toxic mold in rental property http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20060406-9999-2m6mold.html By Dana Littlefield UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER April 6, 2006 Two families who rented a La Mesa duplex and later sued the landlord saying they were exposed to toxic mold are entitled to more than $1 million in damages, a judge has determined. The families contended that improper drainage on the property on Cypress Drive caused mold to grow inside the external walls, causing members of both families, including their children, to become sick. Last month, a San Diego Superior Court jury found that the property's landlord, , was negligent and owed the families more than $874,300 to cover past and future medical bills, property damage and pain and suffering. In a judgment issued Tuesday, Judge Denton increased that amount to more than $1,026,500 to cover attorneys fees and other legal costs. Jeff LaFave, the lawyer for the families, explained in a telephone interview yesterday that the duplex was situated on a " negative slope, " meaning that water would typically drain toward the house rather than away from it. LaFave said experts testified during a trial lasting four and a half weeks that there was evidence of long-term moisture damage under the duplex, such as salt deposits, rust and mud. Mold accumulated in the exterior walls but not in the dividing walls inside the house, suggesting that the problem was caused by poor drainage rather than poor housekeeping, the attorney said. LaFave said the families could see the mold inside the house and were bothered by a " musty smell. " All seven people who lived in the duplex, three adults and four children, suffered respiratory problems they attribute to the mold, LaFave said. Steve and Deleon, and their two young daughters had lived in the duplex since 2002. Friel and her two daughters moved in during the summer of 2004. Both families moved out in January 2005. Konoske, the lawyer for the landlord, said in a telephone interview that his client would not appeal the case because it had been settled, but did not elaborate. LaFave said both sides agreed to the amount determined by the judge and the defendant agreed not to appeal. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- Dana Littlefield: (619) 542-4590; dana.littlefield@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.