Guest guest Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 , I strongly support House Bill 4766 and urge you to send it to the full house for passage. In the past four and 1/2 years I have represented pro bono hundreds of state workers at the probate and family court in Dedham and now the J. Sullivan courthouse in Cambridge. The case in Dedham went to trial with a finding by the trial Judge of a " Sick Building. " I had hoped to attend your hearing on Monday, but I have literally been around clock the last week trying to protect those who work in the Cambridge courthouse. I sat the SJC on Friday waiting for a decision until 6:30p.m. trying to get access to information about work that may disturb asbestos in the courthouse. The hearing continued on Monday thus I was unable to attend and support you important bill. The problem of sick buildings is real and not imagined. In the parlance of the law it passes Daubert and Lanigan. Conditions like asthma and pneumonia have potential life long affects. The psychological affect on an employee who to work in an unhealthy environment cannot be underestimated. I have represented hundreds of state employees who work in these conditions. I will never forget the day I met Gerry M. in the basement to the old location of the Norfolk Probate and Family Court in Dedham. I walked up to him and introduced myself. He was very direct " I have worked my whole life so I can retire and enjoy my grandchildren and I retire in three years I just want to live. " As I type this words tears well up in my eyes. The typical state worker is a dedicated long time public servant. Their life revolves around family. They care deeply about their work. There only crime is they show up every day and then dare they complain about conditions or worse yet organize and seek to protect their coworkers they are " trouble makers. " The acceptance of such intolerable conditions has become an ingrained part of the psychic to survive. This example is typical. In Cambridge Mark T. worked through installation of sprinklers in the 1980's and there is well-documented disturbance of asbestos with no operation and maintenance plan (asbestos safety measures) in place. Mark has been a real hero and driving force in our current struggle. The literature is clear that asbestos burden is cumulative over your live. Mark now says he has " zero tolerance " and he wants to live. He is one of the hardest working most decent guys you want to meet. At night he has a second job at Sears. There no provision for these workers to get access to information and the laws are not that good for them to seek protection from a court. I would be glad to meet with you or your staff and share with you some of the evidence I have from these cases if it would help. I have about a 22 minute video of about a dozen workers talking about the effects of working in a sick building on them that was submitted to the MBA Fenton Committee dealing with the Middlesex Courthouse. I also attach the decision in the Norfolk case and emergency complaint and affidavits file in Middlesex last Friday and yesterday's decision of SJC Justice Greaney. This decision allows our case to continue in the Superior Court, for the moment, at least as more motions to throw the case of these state employees out of court, not on the merits, are planned today I am told. Thus preparation continues . . . I apologize for the informal and unstructured nature of this communication. I await transfer of our case in Middlesex back to a superior court judge so we may go in and seek to prove a right to basic and minimal access to information. Please move towards passage by the full House Bill 4766. Thank you for your dedication to important health care issues. Respectfully, A. Milne Milne Law Offices Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.