Guest guest Posted March 23, 2006 Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 Mold problem drives City Council up wall This story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press on Thursday, March 23, 2006. By ALLISON GATLIN Valley Press Staff Writer http://www.avpress.com/n/23/0323_s6.hts CALIFORNIA CITY - Burning the building to the ground may end up as the most cost-effective and efficient means of dealing with extensive water and mold damage at California City's Sports Center. California City's aging parks facilities have been hard-hit in recent months, with both the Sports Center and Community Center closed due to health and safety concerns. While the Community Center should be reopened to the public next week, the problems that closed the Sports Center are far more extensive, Schafer , human resources director and risk manager, reported to the City Council on Tuesday night. The center, in Central Park, sustained severe water damage during storms last summer, particularly a " microburst " in August. The center was closed shortly after that and sealed. That led to extensive development of mold within the facility, Schafer said. " It's the kind of mold, if you breathe a heavy amount of it, it can cause problems, even death, " she said. The city filed an insurance claim for damage caused during the August storm, but the insurance inspector cannot enter the attic to check the roof for structural damage until the mold is removed. The city is not licensed for mold removal and would have to hire an outside contractor to do the job, Schafer said. No specific cost for this was available at Tuesday's meeting, and she had been unable to find such a service in Kern County. She also cautioned that any insurance claim funds collected would be strictly for storm damage, not mold, because the city's insurance does not cover mold. The council instructed Schafer to seek cost estimates of cleaning the mold enough to allow the insurance inspector inside, with a decision on the future fate of the building to be decided later. In addition to this, estimated to be the least expensive option, Schafer outlined two other possibilities for addressing the Sports Center. One would be to burn the building completely, with the heat safely destroying the mold. The cost for this option would be for staff time and debris removal. However, Public Works Director Dan cautioned that debris removal of that size would also be costly. The third option is to refurbish the building with complete mold removal done by a licensed mold-removal contractor. Although she did not have specific figures, Schafer estimated this option would total several hundred thousand dollars. Concerns about asbestos at the Community Center were addressed by sealing the ceiling with special paint and covering some portions with sheet rock, Schafer said. In addition, employees received exposure training. The problems were mainly in the office areas, not the main room used for public functions, she said. The remedies meet environmental safety standards, but only for a short time. The city will need to look into removal of the asbestos material within the next two years, Schafer said. In other business, the City Council agreed to proceed with a cost estimate for installing a perimeter taxiway on the west end of the airport, providing runway access for businesses there. The council concurred with the recommendation of the Airport Advisory Committee to use a perimeter runway for access rather than shorter, more direct taxiways that would cut across an established glider runway. The decision addressed a long-standing request from a business owner at the west end of the airport and will mirror the taxiway design at the opposite end of the airport. agatlin@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.