Michigan High Court Affirms Plaintiffs Have 6 Years To Sue

[Guest guest]

Michigan High Court Affirms Plaintiffs Have 6 Years To Sue Architect

For Mold Exposure

by LexisNexis

LANSING, Mich. — The state's high court has affirmed that the claims

of plaintiffs alleging architectural malpractice concerning mold

exposure were not time-barred under a state statute that is a

statute of repose and limitation (Ellen L. Hudock, et al.

v. Shulak, et al., No. 126859, Mich. Sup.; 2006 Mich. LEXIS

197).

Ohio Panel Reverses Exclusion Of Mold Expert And Summary Judgment

TOLEDO, Ohio — An appellate panel has reversed summary judgment

against a state-run facility where employees alleged that mold

growth in state-leased suites caused them to suffer respiratory

problems (Louise Terry, et al. v. Ottawa County Board of Mental

Retardation and Developmental Delay, et al., No. OT-05-009, Ohio

App., 6th Dist, Ottawa Co.; 2006 Ohio App. LEXIS 776).

# # #

Pure Air Control Services, Inc.

1-800-422-7873