Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 i tried ,,,, basically they said that they do not have to give a reason for not wishing to rerent just as someone does not want to re renft from them ,,, she said how woudl you feel if i asked why and i ans well if there was a problem i as a manager would wish to know as it is part of good marketing and public relations ,, it woudl prove o me as the customer that you were listening , and since you basically are the mouthepiece for the corporation that interacts with me ,,, this should be a win win,,,, but basicall it boils down to is that they get a budget , and if they do not spend all of the budget on the homes ,,, they get a huge bonous ,,,,, so i really think that is a very bad ideal ,,,, but also i know there has been a lot of fudging of the work orders ,,,, in fact this person just puts the orders on a return call form to make it look like there is really nothing wrong ,,,, i feel like calling on e of the investagation tv shows ,,, but i think i will wait till iget resettled ,, lets face it ,,,, if they are doing it to me they will stilll continue after i am long gone,,,,, ,,, sigh rt LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: This is illegal, the Fair Credit Reporting Act requires that anybody denied credit of any kind be allowed to see what is written about them and challenge incorrect information. Any situation where people excercise their legal and moral rights (like complaining about a dangerous situation, that could hurt others as well as themselves) is protected under the Constitution as free speech and necessary for democracy. Informatiojn on safety complaints by tenants is not the kind of information that they are allowed to compile on tenants. Landlords, yes, but these databases don't do that. (they should) BTW, is there any good database on bad landlords? (You can bet your ass that they would be all over some place where tenants could compile information on THEM. ) These databases may do it anyway, but they should be sued, and they will lose. Bigtime. Think of it this way. if they were allowed to do things like this - intimidating tenants into silence - this nation would become nothing more than a kleptocracy - Ultimately, a nation of fear in which nobody would ever complain to any public agency about any safety issues with products of any kind. Then, where would we be? In other words, this situation is clearly against public policy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 I'm sorry, I thought that you said there was a statewide or national database 'blacklist' of 'complaining' tenants. And if a public corporation rents to one person and doesn't rent to another with similar credit, the person has a right to know exactly why. At least thats the way I understand it. And people have the right to discuss any purchase decisions they might make (about apartments to rent, for example) in a public forum. They should tell the truth, its important.. On 4/2/06, r tk <rose_t_koubek@...> wrote: > i tried ,,,, basically they said that they do not have to give a reason for not wishing to rerent just as someone does not want to re renft from them ,,, she said how woudl you feel if i asked why and i ans well if there was a problem i as a manager would wish to know as it is part of good marketing and public relations ,, it woudl prove o me as the customer that you were listening , and since you basically are the mouthepiece for the corporation that interacts with me ,,, this should be a win win,,,, but basicall it boils down to is that they get a budget , and if they do not spend all of the budget on the homes ,,, they get a huge bonous ,,,,, so i really think that is a very bad ideal ,,,, but also i know there has been a lot of fudging of the work orders ,,,, in fact this person just puts the orders on a return call form to make it look like there is really nothing wrong ,,,, i feel like calling on e of the investagation tv shows ,,, but i think i will wait till > iget resettled ,, lets face it ,,,, if they are doing it to me they will stilll continue after i am long gone,,,,, ,,, sigh rt > > LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: This is illegal, the Fair Credit Reporting Act requires that anybody > denied credit of any kind be allowed to see what is written about them > and challenge incorrect information. > > Any situation where people excercise their legal and moral rights > (like complaining about a dangerous situation, that could hurt others > as well as themselves) is protected under the Constitution as free > speech and necessary for democracy. Informatiojn on safety complaints > by tenants is not the kind of information that they are allowed to > compile on tenants. Landlords, yes, but these databases don't do that. > (they should) > > BTW, is there any good database on bad landlords? (You can bet your > ass that they would be all over some place where tenants could compile > information on THEM. ) > > These databases may do it anyway, but they should be sued, and they > will lose. Bigtime. > > Think of it this way. if they were allowed to do things like this - > intimidating tenants into silence - this nation would become nothing > more than a kleptocracy - Ultimately, a nation of fear in which nobody > would ever complain to any public agency about any safety issues with > products of any kind. Then, where would we be? > > In other words, this situation is clearly against public policy. > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 they said that is the rule . The only way i can get the info is get a lwayer so ,,,,, i am ,, i am just tired ,,,,,, will be going digest ,,, have a lot to do ,,, rt LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: I'm sorry, I thought that you said there was a statewide or national database 'blacklist' of 'complaining' tenants. And if a public corporation rents to one person and doesn't rent to another with similar credit, the person has a right to know exactly why. At least thats the way I understand it. And people have the right to discuss any purchase decisions they might make (about apartments to rent, for example) in a public forum. They should tell the truth, its important.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.