Re: Re: Intercourse with IEQ

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 3/8/2006 9:43:06 PM Pacific Standard Time,

erikmoldwarrior@... writes:

We mustn't screw around with the terminology if we hope to work

together with IEQ in a joint effort.

-

Yes. That's why I asked. But at the same time, I am trying to figure out

how to convert this stuff to English, that those who are decision makers can

understand. Start talking of secondary metabolites, weaponized, the

definition of volitiles, etc...and one is sure to have them asleep in a matter

of

minutes! It's a fine line, Engish without offending those who work with the

science. This issue is far to complex to explain in sound bites. But nothing

gets done unless one can explain it in sound bites. And there in lays much of

the problem of moving the science forward. It also allows great freedom for

those who stifle the science by using the complexity of it to further the

confusion.

Basically, all I would really like to say is " We're sick. Get us some damn

treatment. "

Sharon