FDA and aspartame (sounds like the CDC)

[Guest guest]

New Cancer Study Obligates

FDA To Recall Aspartame

From Dr. Betty i, D.Hum

2-28-6

OPEN LETTER TO FDA - VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

DELANEY AMENDMENT: If a product causes cancer in

animals it cannot be put in food!

The late FDA Toxicologist, Dr. Gross, testified

to the Senate: " In view of all these indications that

the cancer-causing potential of aspartame is a matter

that had been established way beyond any reasonable

doubt, one can ask: What is the reason for the

apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke for this food

additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food,

Drug and Cosmetic Act? Is it not clear beyond any

shadow of a doubt that aspartame has caused brain

tumors or brain cancer in animals?

" Given that this is so (and I cannot see any kind of

tenable argument opposing the view that aspartame

causes cancer) how would the FDA justify its position

that it views a certain amount of aspartame (50mgm/kgm

body weight) as constituting an ADI (Allowable Daily

Intake) or " safe " level of it? Is that position not

equivalent to setting a " tolerance " for this food

additive and thus a violation of that law? And if the

FDA itself elects to violate the law, who is left to

protect the health of the public? "

Your toxicologist admitted you broke the law by

approving aspartame. He also said the significance of

the studies is much greater if one considers that

brain tumors in rats is very rare: " the historical

control rate for such tumors amongst large populations

of rats indicates that no more than 49 animals

afflicted with them have been found amongst nearly

60,000 rats, an incidence rate of less than 1/10th of

1% FDA never fails to consider this aspect of the

" historical control " incidence. ... One cannot help

wondering just why they failed to consider this

particular aspect in reference to the cancer-induction

of aspartame. Had they addressed the historical

incidence of brain tumors amongst rats as presented by

Dr. Olney, they could not have failed to conclude what

I have concluded: - tumors amongst the rats exposed to

aspartame increases many-fold " 8/1/85 Senate, S 10839

- 10840

FDA broke other laws, as shown in the National Soft

Drink Association's long protest against approval,

found in the Senate Congressional Record of 5/7/85

Pages S5507-9: " Section 402 of the FDC Act 21 provides

a food is adulterated if it contains, in whole or in

part 'a decomposed substance or if it is otherwise

unfit for food'. Searle has not demonstrated to a

reasonable certainty that aspartame and its

degradation products are safe for use in soft drinks.

.... Aspartame is inherently markedly and uniquely

unstable in aqueous media. In a liquid such as a soft

drink aspartame will degrade as a function of

temperature and pH. "

The hotter it gets the quicker aspartame decomposes.

NSDA next reveals Searle deliberately used the wrong

test: " High pressure liquid chromatography is a far

superior analytical method relative to thin layer

chromatography and numerous HPLC methods exist for the

detection and quantification of amino acids. Searle's

choice of TLC over HPLC adversely affected the quality

and type of analytical data generated on aspartame and

its decomposition products in soft drinks.. .. an

important decomposition product of aspartame, aspartic

acid cannot be detected at all using TLC. The

inability to account for as much as 39% of aspartame's

decomposition products is significant. The marked and

rapid decomposition of aspartame in soft drinks under

temperatures known to prevail is apparent from data in

the present record and discussed above in these

objections. "

When responsible scientists, physicians and

legislators try to protect us from these criminals the

industry with bottomless checkbooks annihilate our

rights and welfare. Arizona DHS studies showed

aspartame in beverages breaks down into free methanol,

wood alcohol, formaldehyde, diketopiperazine, formic

acid (among other toxins), and a ban of aspartame was

being considered. In 1985 Dr. Woodrow Monte, Director

of Food Science and Nutrition Lab, Arizona State

University, petitioned for a hearing to ban aspartame,

because high temperatures in that state accelerate

methanol and formaldehyde formation. By an unusual

maneuver the legislature altered the text in a Toxic

Waste Bill so to ban regulation of FDA-approved food

additives. This scuttled the hearing Dr. Monte had

been promised.

How are these abominations maneuvered? G. D. Searle

lobbyists were Herwitz, Governor Babbitt's

former Chief of Staff, and other powerful hacks. Then

Searle officials contributed to the campaign of

Arizona House Majority Leader Burton Barr. The

Committee to Reelect Barr gave campaign contributions

to state representatives Don Aldridge, Mills, &

Jan Breuer. They all voted on the side of G. D.

Searle. The legislators were bought and paid for, and

cared not for Arizona citizens. (Gordon 1987)

Another trampled law: Interstate Commerce regulations

prohibit shipping adulterated products, including

drugs, across state lines. All aspartame products are

adulterated!

By law an additive must be inert. It's illegal to sell

a drug as an additive. In original studies aspartame

triggered brain, mammary, uterine, ovarian,

testicular, thyroid and pancreatic tumors and is an

excitoneurotoxic carcinogenic drug. The 2005 3-year

Ramazzini Study on 1,800 rats confirmed what FDA knew

from the beginning: aspartame is a multipotential

carcinogen that caused leukemia, cancer of the

kidneys, lymphoma and cancer of the cranial peripheral

nerves. Only the rats fed aspartame developed

malignant brain tumors. Producers complain researchers

let test animals finish their lives rather than

killing them at 24 months before most cancers develop.

Standard practice is to kill the animals before they

get sick. The Ramazzini study was peer reviewed by 7

world experts.

So FDA's Consumer Online Magazine, February 2006

assures us: " [Aspartame] has come under fire in recent

years from individuals who have used the Internet in

an attempt to link the sweetener to brain tumors and

other serious disorders. But FDA stands behind its

original approval of aspartame, and subsequent

evaluations have shown that the product is safe. A

tiny segment of the population is sensitive to one of

the sweetener's byproducts and should restrict intake.

However, the agency continually monitors safety

information on food ingredients such as aspartame and

may take action to protect public health if it

receives credible scientific evidence indicating a

safety problem "

" A tiny segment? " How about everyone who uses it? In

1995 FDA listed 92 symptoms from 10,000 volunteered

consumer complaints including 4 types of seizures,

sexual dysfunction, dozens of neurological problems,

comas and death. So you stopped publishing the list

and now deny it existed. I've sent another 10,000.

Renowned doctors have written you. An avalanche of

case histories has swept over you from afflicted

victims and survivors nationwide. I have copies of

them. You want credible scientific evidence? Consider

this:

For 16 years FDA rejected aspartame because of brain

tumors. Then Don Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle Co,

went to Washington with Reagan and the next day his

buddy Arthur was appointed FDA Commissioner. To

avoid any action against aspartame by the outgoing

Commissioner an executive freeze order was ordered by

Reagan treacherously making him powerless till

got to town. Reagan was a tragic Alzheimer's

victim, a dread affliction aspartame invokes. It is

rumored he was addicted to Equal, this brain

eradicating neurotoxin, and memory loss is number 9 on

your list of 92 symptoms, right under seizures, number

8.

Now approved aspartame over the objections of

his own scientific Board of Inquiry. Searle was in

money trouble until , Rumsfeld's stooge, opened

the golden door. soon was under investigation

for conflict-of-interest, so he escaped with a 10-year

consulting contract from Searle's PR firm for a

reported $1,000/day. Consultants don't need to show up

for work; just answer questions on the phone, you

know: How's the fishing, Artie? "

Aspartame interacts with all drugs and vaccines:

http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_interacts.htm

Aspartame-using athletes can drop dead:

http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_msg_scd.htm

Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, 1,038 page

medical text

http://www.sunsentpress.com

Excitotoxins, The Taste that Kills

http://www.russellblaylockmd.com

Greek studies on aspartame, Jan, 2006

http://www.wnho.net/newgreekaspartame studies.html

Aspartame makers also manufacture deceit

http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm

http://www.wnho.net/recipefordeath.htm

Doctor Ralph Walton's investigation of funding &

study-results revealed 92% of independent studies show

aspartame is a toxin. To show aspartame is safe the

producers have to buy & control the study, as they did

the Arizona legislature.

http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html

, Member of Parliament, has called for a

British ban. England wouldn't have approved aspartame

had FDA's intended indictment been known. Searle

sneaked it thru by dealing with of Food

Standards, who approved it without publicity. A

Guardian article detailed the collusion.

FDA asked the Justice Department to prosecute G. D.

Searle Co. for fraud, but the producers hired the

prosecutors and the case expired with the statute of

limitations. Neat trick! As an encore a parade of FDA

officials including 3 Commissioners have been welcomed

into the aspartame business. Telling FDA of aspartame

toxicity is complaining to the Mafia about murder.

In the CDC documentary: SWEET MISERY: A POISONED WORLD

[amazon.com & & Noble] see Atty. ,

former Nader Raider, explain how Don Rumsfeld called

in his markers to get it approved. FDA had revoked

approval because of the brain tumor issue, and because

it was not proven safe, leaving this question: For 16

years until overruled your Board of Inquiry the

FDA denied approval and tried to indict Searle for

fraud: So why lie about it now? Is there another

answer than political corruption? Meanwhile you

attempt a rule change to prevent states from writing

food safety laws. Do you intend to now go against the

Bill of Rights, 9 and 10th amendment which forbids

removing the rights of the people and the states?

In the Falklands Robin Goodwin has called for a ban.

In New Mexico Fox has petitioned the

Environmental Improvement Board and the Board of

Pharmacy to ban aspartame in New Mexico based on the

fact that aspartame is adulterated and against the

law. Governor Bill III has been asked by 10

New Mexico State Senators to declare a state of public

health emergency, in accordance with NMSA 12-10A-5.

The emergency derives from consumers in New Mexico

consuming methanol and formaldehyde, derivative

aspartame metabolites.

You say you " may " take action to protect public health

if you receive credible scientific evidence indicating

a safety problem? A mountain of absolute evidence is

in your possession! The impeccable Italian study

proves aspartame is " a multipotential carcinogen " . The

bottom line of the new Greek study is Alzheimers. The

world's population are guinea pigs, daily proving

aspartame destroys the brain, central nervous system,

immune system and retina, causes cancer,

neurodegenerative diseases, precipitates diabetes,

interacts with all drugs and vaccines, triggers

obesity and is an endocrine disrupting drug, an

abortifacient, adjuvant and teratogen that brings

birth defects and retardation. University of Texas

epidemiological study on 8 years data linked diet

drinks with obesity just a few months ago.

Obviously your allegiance is to Big Pharma & their

lobbyists, who are the Washington infestation

destroying America with chemical weapons of mass

destruction, while you pretend to be saviors and seek

to outlaw vitamins and herbs.

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/spingola/060207

You once attempted to indict G. D. Searle at a time

when you had some conscience under Title 18, Section

1001.

This US Criminal Code declares: " Whoever, in an matter

within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative

or judicial matter branch of the Government of the

United States, knowingly and willfully

* (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick,

scheme, or device a material fact;

* (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or

fraudulent statement or representation;

* (3) or make or uses any false writing or document

knowing the same to contain any materially false,

fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be

fined under the title or imprisoned.

Today FDA, you are now guilty of the same crime as you

deceive the public by telling them aspartame is safe

when you have full knowledge it is not only not safe,

but that you wanted the manufacturer indicted for

fraud. Your own toxicologists, Dr. Gross and

Dr. Verrett observed Searle researchers'

manipulation attempting to make a poison show safety.

They just couldn't do it as Jerome Bressler explained

in the FDA audit. They were caught.

Four years ago I filed a Citizens Petition for ban:

http://www.wnho.net/citizens_aspartame_petition.htm

The law requires an answer in 180 days, which law you

broke, and brazenly wrote me that you have matters of

higher priority. Saving consumer lives is low

priority? Or was it impossible to answer my petition

that proved from government records that you lie to

America?

Bowen, M.D. with Lou Gehrigs disease from

aspartame, wrote FDA: " The only responsible action

would be to immediately take aspartame off the market,

fully disclose its toxicities, offer full compensation

to the injured, public and criminally prosecute anyone

who participated in the fraudulent placement of

aspartame on the marketplace. That includes those who

work so diligently to keep it on the market as well. "

In secret trade information Searle said: " With the

spoon-for-spoon, we have no way of estimating maximum

likely abuse and hence need to utilize data based on

almost complete conversion to DKP. If we include this

use in the original FAP, we stand a good chance of

ending up with nothing in the short run and nothing in

the long run where as the other approach would give us

something in the short run and, quite likely as much

as we would ever get in the long run. " DKP is the

brain tumor agent. They knew aspartame would cause

these tumors worldwide. Premeditated mass murder!

www.dorway.com

Heroic New Mexico Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino who just

sponsored the bill to ban aspartame said

" Nothing surprises me anymore when it comes to the

corrosive influence of money on our public policy...

the final reckoning can only be postponed, not

avoided "

http://www.rense.com/general69/nmm2.htm

I demand that you invoke the Delaney Amendment!

, who with Dr. Olney worked to prevent

aspartame approval, declares the Delaney Amendment

remains as written, although many have attempted to

try and repeal it and wrote a clause

attempting to minimize it. Yet they did not succeed he

says and it is as valid today as the day it became the

law. The Ramazzini study confirms aspartame is a

virulent carcinogen. This requires FDA to invoke the

Delaney Amendment which is emphatic if a product

causes cancer in animals it CANNOT BE PUT IN FOOD.

This should have been done a quarter of a century ago

as your scientists advocated. Refusal will confirm

once more that FDA is run by political lapdogs

dedicated to their personal aggrandizement,

treacherously condemning multitudes to disability and

death. Mission Possible is a global volunteer force

warning consumers about aspartame because FDA refuses

to fulfill its commission to enforce laws that protect

us.

We're taking aspartame brain tumor cases in NY and NJ

for litigation, and this is just the beginning. This

is written as an open letter so all reading it will

send it to their congressman, explaining how FDA has

sanctioned mass poisoning by bureaucratic fiat.

Be warned: A higher judge untouched by bribes has

pronounced the inevitable consequence of such

duplicity: " Woe to you who are despoiling and who are

dealing treacherously As soon as you have finished as

a despoiler, you will be despoiled. As soon as you

have done with dealing treacherously, they will deal

treacherously with you. " Isaiah 33:1 NWT

Dr. Betty i, D.Hum, Founder

Mission Possible International

9270 River Club Parkway

Duluth, Georgia 30097

770 242-2599

http://www.wnho.net/

http://www.dorway.com/

www.holisticmed.com/aspartame -

Aspartame Toxicity Center

__________________________________________________