Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 728hz Works for me. AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. Jim wrote: > > & Dave: > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > wish my vision were still as good. > > Regards, Jim > > Brown wrote: > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > sub-sonic? > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be closer > > >to the right frequency. > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters). > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > Also, > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > that each > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > apart > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > Valone > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > stuff and > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping > > for a > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Don't know how that happened. I probably need a new PC battery. Gaston wrote: > > One thing I *believe*... and that is that you guys are > messing with the date on your PC! :-) > > Gaston > > --- Dave Narby <dnarby@... <mailto:dnarby%40gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Hey , > > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or > > understanding of the > > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > > > > > > > I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence > > of an all loving, > > all knowing God. > > > > The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely > > interested in. The > > fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough > > cause for further > > investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics > > told me the > > operating principles behind it were sound just piques > > my interest more. > > > > Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, > > he's certainly > > seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular > > unmaintained in real > > time, but even that would be amazing to see (and > > perhaps extremely > > informative). > > > > Dave > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 I don't know enough to explain it. However, this person's personal expertise happens to be lasers. He's the type of guy who will (for instance) obtain alpha and beta rods from a now-defunct top secret high energy laser research program, accumulate enough half-gallon sized capacitors to fill up half a pickup truck bed, and then construct a " giant pulse " laser... Just to see how many " Gillettes " he can achieve. What this means is that he's forgotten more about rectifying, polarizing, interfering, and otherwise screwing with light than we will probably ever know. Besides, the inventor is still alive, and a functioning model is available for inspection. That will answer all questions. Brown wrote: > > Hey Dave: > > Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this > multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what > basis did he think it could be plausible? > > > > >Hey , > > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the > > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > > > > >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving, > >all knowing God. > > > >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested in. The > >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further > >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the > >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest more. > > > >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly > >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real > >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely > >informative). > > > >Dave > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also, have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans Regards, Jim .. For example, why is this RF good and all > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a > while longer? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Well, there it is... You gotta get out more! I find that focusing on my nose and then on the horizon about 20 times gives the peepers a good workout. Jim wrote: > > Dave: > > I have taken Bilberry, eaten a fist full of blueberries every day for > the last ten years, and take Dr. 's eye formula regularly (which > looks great on paper). Plus I took the " Vision for Life " course and > exercise regularly. Part of the problem is that is sit in front of a > computer for 12 hours a day. > > By UV blockers... do you mean eyeglasses with UV filters? There are > pros and cons on that as you must be aware. > > Regards, Jim > > Narby wrote: > > > 728hz Works for me. > > > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > > > Jim wrote: > > > > > > & Dave: > > > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone > band, but > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > closer > > > > >to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a > foot) in > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that > I saw > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 > meters). > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > > > Also, > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > that each > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > > > apart > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > > > Valone > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it > > is how > > > > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of > keeping > > > > for a > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Well, there it is... You gotta get out more! I find that focusing on my nose and then on the horizon about 20 times gives the peepers a good workout. Jim wrote: > > Dave: > > I have taken Bilberry, eaten a fist full of blueberries every day for > the last ten years, and take Dr. 's eye formula regularly (which > looks great on paper). Plus I took the " Vision for Life " course and > exercise regularly. Part of the problem is that is sit in front of a > computer for 12 hours a day. > > By UV blockers... do you mean eyeglasses with UV filters? There are > pros and cons on that as you must be aware. > > Regards, Jim > > Narby wrote: > > > 728hz Works for me. > > > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > > > Jim wrote: > > > > > > & Dave: > > > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone > band, but > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > closer > > > > >to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a > foot) in > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that > I saw > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 > meters). > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > > > Also, > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > that each > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > > > apart > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > > > Valone > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it > > is how > > > > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of > keeping > > > > for a > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hunter gatherers don't tend to live that long, unfortunately. http://www.disability.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Aboriginal_health_i\ ssues?open steve wrote: > > I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch > about > eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative > but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather > peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with > either skin > cancer or eye sight. > > My 3 cents. > > -- > > Steve - dudescholar2@... <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net> > > " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. " > --Voltaire > > On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote: > > 728hz Works for me. > > > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > > > Jim wrote: > > > & Dave: > > > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone > band, but > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > > > > closer to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a > foot) in > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that > I saw > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 > meters). > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > > > > > > Also, > > > > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > > > > that each > > > > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > > > > > > apart > > > > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > > > > > > Valone > > > > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is > > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > > > > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of > keeping > > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > -- This is your brain on politics: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060131092225.htm Yep! You've been an annoying zombie all these years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 TTBOMK, a Beta rod triggers the Alpha rod to achieve a " Giant Pulse " . And you certainly established your bona fides by knowing what " Gillettes " meant! : D My friend is the engineer for the Physics department at my old university. He's described his career as mostly spent re-designing grad student's experiments so they would actually work. I think you and he would probably have some interesting stories to swap. Brown wrote: > > Hi: > > I've played with lasers a bit too. I founded an optical telecom > company sending a gazillion phone conversations on fiber, we sold > over a $B/year within 5 years. I used laser activated florescence > for medical imaging and sensing at high speed. I built a ruby laser > when I was in high school, using homemade capacitors with aluminum > foil and glass sheets - huge - but the later ones were all much > smaller including all the power supplies and capacitors. > > What is an alpha rod or a beta rod? Are these weapons terms? I'm > not familiar with that. Boy and " Gillette " (meaning how many razor > blades you can penetrate with a laser) is a very old vernacular term > mainly used by early laser technicians working with military > applications if my memory serves me well. None of my work ever > involved that terminology. Lasers used in medicine and telecom, even > for surgery or dental work are not that powerful. > > What does this guy do now? Where did he study physics? > > > > At 10:54 AM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > >I don't know enough to explain it. > > > >However, this person's personal expertise happens to be lasers. He's > >the type of guy who will (for instance) obtain alpha and beta rods from > >a now-defunct top secret high energy laser research program, accumulate > >enough half-gallon sized capacitors to fill up half a pickup truck bed, > >and then construct a " giant pulse " laser... Just to see how many > > " Gillettes " he can achieve. What this means is that he's forgotten more > >about rectifying, polarizing, interfering, and otherwise screwing with > >light than we will probably ever know. > > > >Besides, the inventor is still alive, and a functioning model is > >available for inspection. That will answer all questions. > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > Hey Dave: > > > > > > Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this > > > multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what > > > basis did he think it could be plausible? > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hey , > > > > > > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the > > > > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > > > > > > > > > > >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving, > > > >all knowing God. > > > > > > > >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested > in. The > > > >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further > > > >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the > > > >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest > more. > > > > > > > >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly > > > >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real > > > >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely > > > >informative). > > > > > > > >Dave > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2006 Report Share Posted September 4, 2006 Hi: 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters). Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also, >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > >Regards, Jim > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a > > while longer? > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and dogs can hear to 45 KHz 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be sub-sonic? > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be closer >to the right frequency. > > Brown wrote: > > > > Hi: > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters). > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also, > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Hey Dave: Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what basis did he think it could be plausible? >Hey , > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving, >all knowing God. > >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested in. The >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest more. > >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely >informative). > >Dave > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Dave: You should know by now that I can't type :0) Of course it is 7000hz. Sorry bout that. Jim > It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be sub-sonic? > > It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be closer > to the right frequency. > > Brown wrote: > > > > Hi: > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters). > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also, > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 & Dave: is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only wish my vision were still as good. Regards, Jim Brown wrote: > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be sub-sonic? > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be closer > >to the right frequency. > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters). > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also, > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping > for a > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 I don't know about 714x, but the Rife machine is snake oil IMNSHO. Many patients of mine have used Rife machines and I have never ever been able to discern any benefit. This includes a man who died of cancer who used the machine for over two years on a very serious and regular manner. Hans On 9/4/06, Brown <scotflyr@...> wrote: > > Hi: > > In reviewing the <http://www.cerbe.com/>Gaston site, I found the sale > of the cancer therapeutic agent, 714-X, to be injected into lymph > nodes or inhaled, to be quite > interesting. > < > http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3>This > > review by the National cancer institute is straightforwardly stated > and fairly unbiased. Does anyone know anything about 714X? I found > some glowing testimonials about it but also some reports that Gaston > is insane. How would I know who's right? You can purchase the > injectable from the web site for > <https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta.html>$300. This is a far cry > from the pulsed RF resonant device that supposedly kills all the bad > microbes.... 714X is supposed to enable your immune system to work > better to recognize and kill cancer cells. Conceptually, that is > great and it is how many other alternative therapies say that they > work, like the Gearson therapy. > > Personally, I'm not ready to try either the RF device or 714X without > a lot more verification. For example, why is this RF good and all > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a > while longer? I don't have the foggiest idea how 714X or Rife's 500 > Watt RF transmitter aimed at my body work. > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Hans: There have been many inferior replications of his original. They talk about it in the video and also Ton Valone talks about it. Many of the recent spin-offs are directed at well being rather than curing disease. Tom Valone in his talk at the Tesla Conference said that we can get antioxidants much more readily via vibratory frequency than through digestion. He makes a good case. I figure that the answer probably rests in doing both. Can you get too many antioxidants? I should have overdosed by now if so, by my measurements. : Check out these links on Dr. Eskeland's new Testosterone enhancing extract (on the cover of Swanson's catalog)(by the way, I agree with your assessment of the company) : http://www.rgglife.com/index.asp?id=5 & press=10 <http://www.rgglife.com/index.asp?id=5 & press=10> http://www.petting-zoo.net/~deadbeef/archive/512.html <http://www.petting-zoo.net/%7Edeadbeef/archive/512.html> Kind Regards, Jim Using an inferior machine over two years is definitely snake oil Conser wrote: > I don't know about 714x, but the Rife machine is snake oil IMNSHO. Many > patients of mine have used Rife machines and I have never ever been > able to > discern any benefit. This includes a man who died of cancer who used the > machine for over two years on a very serious and regular manner. > > Hans > > On 9/4/06, Brown <scotflyr@... > <mailto:scotflyr%40pacbell.net>> wrote: > > > > Hi: > > > > In reviewing the <http://www.cerbe.com/ > <http://www.cerbe.com/>>Gaston site, I found the sale > > of the cancer therapeutic agent, 714-X, to be injected into lymph > > nodes or inhaled, to be quite > > interesting. > > < > > > http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3 > <http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3>>Thi\ s > > > > review by the National cancer institute is straightforwardly stated > > and fairly unbiased. Does anyone know anything about 714X? I found > > some glowing testimonials about it but also some reports that Gaston > > is insane. How would I know who's right? You can purchase the > > injectable from the web site for > > <https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta.html > <https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta.html>>$300. This is a far cry > > from the pulsed RF resonant device that supposedly kills all the bad > > microbes.... 714X is supposed to enable your immune system to work > > better to recognize and kill cancer cells. Conceptually, that is > > great and it is how many other alternative therapies say that they > > work, like the Gearson therapy. > > > > Personally, I'm not ready to try either the RF device or 714X without > > a lot more verification. For example, why is this RF good and all > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a > > while longer? I don't have the foggiest idea how 714X or Rife's 500 > > Watt RF transmitter aimed at my body work. > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Dave: I have taken Bilberry, eaten a fist full of blueberries every day for the last ten years, and take Dr. 's eye formula regularly (which looks great on paper). Plus I took the " Vision for Life " course and exercise regularly. Part of the problem is that is sit in front of a computer for 12 hours a day. By UV blockers... do you mean eyeglasses with UV filters? There are pros and cons on that as you must be aware. Regards, Jim Narby wrote: > 728hz Works for me. > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > Jim wrote: > > > > & Dave: > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > closer > > > >to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters). > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > > Also, > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > that each > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > > apart > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > > Valone > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it > is how > > > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > > stuff and > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping > > > for a > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch about eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with either skin cancer or eye sight. My 3 cents. -- Steve - dudescholar2@... " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. " --Voltaire On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote: > 728hz Works for me. > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > Jim wrote: > > & Dave: > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > Brown wrote: > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > > > closer to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters). > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > > > > Also, > > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > > that each > > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > > > > apart > > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > > > > Valone > > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Hi: I've played with lasers a bit too. I founded an optical telecom company sending a gazillion phone conversations on fiber, we sold over a $B/year within 5 years. I used laser activated florescence for medical imaging and sensing at high speed. I built a ruby laser when I was in high school, using homemade capacitors with aluminum foil and glass sheets - huge - but the later ones were all much smaller including all the power supplies and capacitors. What is an alpha rod or a beta rod? Are these weapons terms? I'm not familiar with that. Boy and " Gillette " (meaning how many razor blades you can penetrate with a laser) is a very old vernacular term mainly used by early laser technicians working with military applications if my memory serves me well. None of my work ever involved that terminology. Lasers used in medicine and telecom, even for surgery or dental work are not that powerful. What does this guy do now? Where did he study physics? At 10:54 AM 9/4/2006, you wrote: >I don't know enough to explain it. > >However, this person's personal expertise happens to be lasers. He's >the type of guy who will (for instance) obtain alpha and beta rods from >a now-defunct top secret high energy laser research program, accumulate >enough half-gallon sized capacitors to fill up half a pickup truck bed, >and then construct a " giant pulse " laser... Just to see how many > " Gillettes " he can achieve. What this means is that he's forgotten more >about rectifying, polarizing, interfering, and otherwise screwing with >light than we will probably ever know. > >Besides, the inventor is still alive, and a functioning model is >available for inspection. That will answer all questions. > > Brown wrote: > > > > Hey Dave: > > > > Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this > > multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what > > basis did he think it could be plausible? > > > > > > > > >Hey , > > > > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the > > > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > > > > > > > >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving, > > >all knowing God. > > > > > >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested in. The > > >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further > > >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the > > >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest more. > > > > > >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly > > >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real > > >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely > > >informative). > > > > > >Dave > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Hi I read a book a number of years ago " <http://www.amazon.com/Health-Light-Effects-Natural-Artificial/dp/0898040981>He\ alth and Light " by Ott, the person who did Disney's time-lapse pictures of fruit ripening and flowers blooming. They tried putting fruit into Plexiglass boxes so that they wouldn't move as they ripened and they just got bigger but never changed color to ripen because they were shielded from the UV. They had to get a special glass that passed UV for the fruit and flowers to blossom or ripen. He later got eye problems and remembering his experience with time-lapse and plants, used it to heal his eyes with natural sunlight. Too much can cause problems too, in my opinion. Dr , an herbalist with whom I studied, claims to have cured skin cancer with sunlight. I have a bad experience. I had a pterygium - a red, vascular growth on the surface of my eye caused by excessive exposure to the sun. Of course, maybe it was because I stopped going out in the sun, but I doubt it. I lived on the beach and went out to the beach everyday. My skin has sun damage too, partly corrected by good moisturizers. I had the pterygium surgically removed so that I could wear contact lenses. Moderation anyone? At 02:18 PM 9/5/2006, you wrote: >I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch about >eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative >but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather >peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with either skin >cancer or eye sight. > >My 3 cents. > >-- > >Steve - <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>dudescholar2@... > > " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. " >--Voltaire > >On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote: > > 728hz Works for me. > > > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > > > Jim wrote: > > > & Dave: > > > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > > > > closer to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters). > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > > > > > > Also, > > > > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > > > > that each > > > > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > > > > > > apart > > > > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > > > > > > Valone > > > > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is > > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > > > > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping > > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Hi: Personally the physics involved with supposedly selectively " exploding " cancer cells, but not normal cells through resonance seems like black magic to me. I'm a major doubter until and unless I see it and fully understand it. None of the explanations sounds plausible to me. At 10:24 AM 9/5/2006, you wrote: >I don't know about 714x, but the Rife machine is snake oil IMNSHO. Many >patients of mine have used Rife machines and I have never ever been able to >discern any benefit. This includes a man who died of cancer who used the >machine for over two years on a very serious and regular manner. > >Hans > >On 9/4/06, Brown ><<mailto:scotflyr%40pacbell.net>scotflyr@...> wrote: > > > > Hi: > > > > In reviewing the > <<http://www.cerbe.com/>http://www.cerbe.com/>Gaston site, I found the sale > > of the cancer therapeutic agent, 714-X, to be injected into lymph > > nodes or inhaled, to be quite > > interesting. > > < > > > <http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3>http\ ://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3>This > > > > review by the National cancer institute is straightforwardly stated > > and fairly unbiased. Does anyone know anything about 714X? I found > > some glowing testimonials about it but also some reports that Gaston > > is insane. How would I know who's right? You can purchase the > > injectable from the web site for > > > <<https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta.html>https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta\ ..html>$300. > This is a far cry > > from the pulsed RF resonant device that supposedly kills all the bad > > microbes.... 714X is supposed to enable your immune system to work > > better to recognize and kill cancer cells. Conceptually, that is > > great and it is how many other alternative therapies say that they > > work, like the Gearson therapy. > > > > Personally, I'm not ready to try either the RF device or 714X without > > a lot more verification. For example, why is this RF good and all > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a > > while longer? I don't have the foggiest idea how 714X or Rife's 500 > > Watt RF transmitter aimed at my body work. > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 5, 2006 Report Share Posted September 5, 2006 Hi: I once considered building a concealed CO2 laser in my car with a targeting system to do nasty things like blowing out the tires of cars that do bad things in traffic. I decided it was doable but that I wasn't that type of person, it was just a passing fancy one day in traffic going to work in Silicon Valley. At 03:23 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: >TTBOMK, a Beta rod triggers the Alpha rod to achieve a " Giant Pulse " . >And you certainly established your bona fides by knowing what > " Gillettes " meant! : D > >My friend is the engineer for the Physics department at my old >university. He's described his career as mostly spent re-designing grad >student's experiments so they would actually work. I think you and he >would probably have some interesting stories to swap. > > Brown wrote: > > > > Hi: > > > > I've played with lasers a bit too. I founded an optical telecom > > company sending a gazillion phone conversations on fiber, we sold > > over a $B/year within 5 years. I used laser activated florescence > > for medical imaging and sensing at high speed. I built a ruby laser > > when I was in high school, using homemade capacitors with aluminum > > foil and glass sheets - huge - but the later ones were all much > > smaller including all the power supplies and capacitors. > > > > What is an alpha rod or a beta rod? Are these weapons terms? I'm > > not familiar with that. Boy and " Gillette " (meaning how many razor > > blades you can penetrate with a laser) is a very old vernacular term > > mainly used by early laser technicians working with military > > applications if my memory serves me well. None of my work ever > > involved that terminology. Lasers used in medicine and telecom, even > > for surgery or dental work are not that powerful. > > > > What does this guy do now? Where did he study physics? > > > > > > > > At 10:54 AM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > >I don't know enough to explain it. > > > > > >However, this person's personal expertise happens to be lasers. He's > > >the type of guy who will (for instance) obtain alpha and beta rods from > > >a now-defunct top secret high energy laser research program, accumulate > > >enough half-gallon sized capacitors to fill up half a pickup truck bed, > > >and then construct a " giant pulse " laser... Just to see how many > > > " Gillettes " he can achieve. What this means is that he's forgotten more > > >about rectifying, polarizing, interfering, and otherwise screwing with > > >light than we will probably ever know. > > > > > >Besides, the inventor is still alive, and a functioning model is > > >available for inspection. That will answer all questions. > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey Dave: > > > > > > > > Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this > > > > multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what > > > > basis did he think it could be plausible? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hey , > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the > > > > > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving, > > > > >all knowing God. > > > > > > > > > >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested > > in. The > > > > >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further > > > > >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the > > > > >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest > > more. > > > > > > > > > >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly > > > > >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real > > > > >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely > > > > >informative). > > > > > > > > > >Dave > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 Steve: I had an aunt who used to make frozen jams using fresh berries and gelatin with no sugar added. They tasted great and certainly were equal to fresh berries in most respects Bet you concur given that, huh? No question that refined sugar is not a good food additive and I almost never touch the stuff.. Regards, Jim wrote: > I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch > about > eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative > but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather > peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with > either skin > cancer or eye sight. > > My 3 cents. > > -- > > Steve - dudescholar2@... <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net> > > " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. " > --Voltaire > > On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote: > > 728hz Works for me. > > > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > > > Jim wrote: > > > & Dave: > > > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone > band, but > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > > > > closer to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a > foot) in > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that > I saw > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 > meters). > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > > > > > > Also, > > > > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > > > > that each > > > > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > > > > > > apart > > > > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > > > > > > Valone > > > > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is > > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > > > > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of > keeping > > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 Steve: I had an aunt who used to make frozen jams using fresh berries and gelatin with no sugar added. They tasted great and certainly were equal to fresh berries in most respects Bet you concur given that, huh? No question that refined sugar is not a good food additive and I almost never touch the stuff.. Regards, Jim wrote: > I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch > about > eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative > but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather > peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with > either skin > cancer or eye sight. > > My 3 cents. > > -- > > Steve - dudescholar2@... <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net> > > " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. " > --Voltaire > > On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote: > > 728hz Works for me. > > > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > > > Jim wrote: > > > & Dave: > > > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60 > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only > > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone > band, but > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > > > > closer to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a > foot) in > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that > I saw > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 > meters). > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. > > > > > > Also, > > > > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > > > > that each > > > > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it > > > > > > apart > > > > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, > > > > > > Valone > > > > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is > > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad > > > > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of > keeping > > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 Dave: Your conclusion regarding UV seems to fit current conclusions of those who are paying attention. Contemporary aboriginal people are probably not correctly categorized as hunter gatherers, but I'd imagine that life as a bear hunter using spears as weapons would be fairly compacted. There was documentary on a group of people who lived in the British Isles 8,000 years ago. They studied their bones which were well preserved in crypts. The conclusion was that 25 years old was average and the oldest found was 50 years old. The added conclusion was that we have been doing better in last few hundred years in terms of longevity. However, I am not convinced that a long life span is a real answer, there is much more to it. My nickel, Jim Dave Narby wrote: > Hunter gatherers don't tend to live that long, unfortunately. > http://www.disability.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Aboriginal_health_i\ ssues?open > <http://www.disability.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Aboriginal_health_\ issues?open> > > steve wrote: > > > > I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch > > about > > eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a > negative > > but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather > > peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with > > either skin > > cancer or eye sight. > > > > My 3 cents. > > > > -- > > > > Steve - dudescholar2@... > <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net> > <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net> > > > > " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. " > > --Voltaire > > > > On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote: > > > 728hz Works for me. > > > > > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > > > > > Jim wrote: > > > > & Dave: > > > > > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at > age 60 > > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. > I only > > > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone > > band, but > > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. > Maybe > > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > > > > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > > > > > closer to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a > > foot) in > > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a > 428 Km > > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that > > I saw > > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 > > meters). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, > " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a > very > > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it > finish it. > > > > > > > > Also, > > > > > > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > > > > > > that each > > > > > > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that > blows it > > > > > > > > apart > > > > > > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. > Finally, > > > > > > > > Valone > > > > > > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, > it is > > > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance > kill bad > > > > > > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of > > keeping > > > > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > This is your brain on politics: > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060131092225.htm > <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060131092225.htm> > > Yep! You've been an annoying zombie all these years. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2006 Report Share Posted September 6, 2006 : Plexiglas? I have an 80 year old friend who has the eyes of a 30 yr old. He looks directly into the sun to dilate his eyes every day that the sun is shinning... works for him. Many others now claim that sunlight cures skin cancer and sun screen causes it... Dr. Mercola is one. One observation is that melanomas most often occur in the middle of the back and bottoms of feet where the sun never generally goes. There is also the argument that Vit D is a deterrent to many cancers and the observation that dark skinned people get less of it from sunlight and thus show negative effects in terms of certain cancers and other diseases. Jim Brown wrote: > Hi > > I read a book a number of years ago > " <http://www.amazon.com/Health-Light-Effects-Natural-Artificial/dp/0898040981 > <http://www.amazon.com/Health-Light-Effects-Natural-Artificial/dp/0898040981>>He\ alth > > and Light " by Ott, the person who did Disney's time-lapse > pictures of fruit ripening and flowers blooming. They tried putting > fruit into Plexiglass boxes so that they wouldn't move as they > ripened and they just got bigger but never changed color to ripen > because they were shielded from the UV. They had to get a special > glass that passed UV for the fruit and flowers to blossom or > ripen. He later got eye problems and remembering his experience with > time-lapse and plants, used it to heal his eyes with natural > sunlight. Too much can cause problems too, in my opinion. Dr > , an herbalist with whom I studied, claims to have cured > skin cancer with sunlight. > > I have a bad experience. I had a pterygium - a red, vascular growth > on the surface of my eye caused by excessive exposure to the sun. Of > course, maybe it was because I stopped going out in the sun, but I > doubt it. I lived on the beach and went out to the beach > everyday. My skin has sun damage too, partly corrected by good > moisturizers. I had the pterygium surgically removed so that I could > wear contact lenses. > > Moderation anyone? > > > > At 02:18 PM 9/5/2006, you wrote: > > >I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch > about > >eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative > >but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather > >peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with > either skin > >cancer or eye sight. > > > >My 3 cents. > > > >-- > > > >Steve - > <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>dudescholar2@... > <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net> > > > > " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. " > >--Voltaire > > > >On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote: > > > 728hz Works for me. > > > > > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark > > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises > > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside. > > > > > > Jim wrote: > > > > & Dave: > > > > > > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys > > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The > > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz.. > > > > > > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at > age 60 > > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it > > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. > I only > > > > wish my vision were still as good. > > > > > > > > Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a > > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and > > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz > > > > > > > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone > band, but > > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief > > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. > Maybe > > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote: > > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be > > > > > > > > sub-sonic? > > > > > > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be > > > > > > closer to the right frequency. > > > > > > > > > > > > Brown wrote: > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the > > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a > foot) in > > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a > 428 Km > > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines > that I saw > > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 > meters). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, > " Bioelectromagnetic > > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a > very > > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it > finish it. > > > > > > > > Also, > > > > > > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed > > > > > > > > that each > > > > > > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that > blows it > > > > > > > > apart > > > > > > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. > Finally, > > > > > > > > Valone > > > > > > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, > it is > > > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance > kill bad > > > > > > > > stuff and > > > > > > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of > keeping > > > > > > > > > > for a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > while longer? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.