Re: 714-X Cancer Treatment

September 4, 2006

728hz Works for me.

AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

Jim wrote:

>

> & Dave:

>

> is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

>

> I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> wish my vision were still as good.

>

> Regards, Jim

>

> Brown wrote:

>

> > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> >

> > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but

> > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> >

> > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> >

> > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> sub-sonic?

> > >

> > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be closer

> > >to the right frequency.

> > >

> > > Brown wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Hi:

> > > >

> > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in

> > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw

> > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters).

> > > >

> > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > >

> > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> Also,

> > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> that each

> > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> apart

> > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> Valone

> > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > >

> > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > >

> > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > >

> > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> stuff and

> > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping

> > for a

> > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > >

> > > > >

September 4, 2006

Don't know how that happened. I probably need a new PC battery.

Gaston wrote:

>

> One thing I *believe*... and that is that you guys are

> messing with the date on your PC! :-)

>

> Gaston

>

> --- Dave Narby <dnarby@... <mailto:dnarby%40gmail.com>> wrote:

>

> > Hey ,

> >

> > > If you don't have first-hand experience or

> > understanding of the

> > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

> > >

> >

> > I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence

> > of an all loving,

> > all knowing God.

> >

> > The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely

> > interested in. The

> > fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough

> > cause for further

> > investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics

> > told me the

> > operating principles behind it were sound just piques

> > my interest more.

> >

> > Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet,

> > he's certainly

> > seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular

> > unmaintained in real

> > time, but even that would be amazing to see (and

> > perhaps extremely

> > informative).

> >

> > Dave

> >

September 4, 2006

I don't know enough to explain it.

However, this person's personal expertise happens to be lasers. He's

the type of guy who will (for instance) obtain alpha and beta rods from

a now-defunct top secret high energy laser research program, accumulate

enough half-gallon sized capacitors to fill up half a pickup truck bed,

and then construct a " giant pulse " laser... Just to see how many

" Gillettes " he can achieve. What this means is that he's forgotten more

about rectifying, polarizing, interfering, and otherwise screwing with

light than we will probably ever know.

Besides, the inventor is still alive, and a functioning model is

available for inspection. That will answer all questions.

Brown wrote:

>

> Hey Dave:

>

> Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this

> multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what

> basis did he think it could be plausible?

>

> >Hey ,

> >

> > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the

> > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

> > >

> >

> >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving,

> >all knowing God.

> >

> >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested in. The

> >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further

> >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the

> >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest more.

> >

> >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly

> >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real

> >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely

> >informative).

> >

> >Dave

> >

September 4, 2006

De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also,

have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each

cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart

and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone

mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

Regards, Jim

.. For example, why is this RF good and all

> other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and

> not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a

> while longer?

>

September 4, 2006

Well, there it is... You gotta get out more!

I find that focusing on my nose and then on the horizon about 20 times

gives the peepers a good workout.

Jim wrote:

>

> Dave:

>

> I have taken Bilberry, eaten a fist full of blueberries every day for

> the last ten years, and take Dr. 's eye formula regularly (which

> looks great on paper). Plus I took the " Vision for Life " course and

> exercise regularly. Part of the problem is that is sit in front of a

> computer for 12 hours a day.

>

> By UV blockers... do you mean eyeglasses with UV filters? There are

> pros and cons on that as you must be aware.

>

> Regards, Jim

>

> Narby wrote:

>

> > 728hz Works for me.

> >

> > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

> >

> > Jim wrote:

> > >

> > > & Dave:

> > >

> > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> > >

> > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> > > wish my vision were still as good.

> > >

> > > Regards, Jim

> > >

> > > Brown wrote:

> > >

> > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > > >

> > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone

> band, but

> > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > > >

> > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > > sub-sonic?

> > > > >

> > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > closer

> > > > >to the right frequency.

> > > > >

> > > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hi:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a

> foot) in

> > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that

> I saw

> > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11

> meters).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> > > Also,

> > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > > that each

> > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> > > apart

> > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> > > Valone

> > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it

> > is how

> > > > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> > > stuff and

> > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of

> keeping

> > > > for a

> > > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

September 4, 2006

Well, there it is... You gotta get out more!

I find that focusing on my nose and then on the horizon about 20 times

gives the peepers a good workout.

Jim wrote:

>

> Dave:

>

> I have taken Bilberry, eaten a fist full of blueberries every day for

> the last ten years, and take Dr. 's eye formula regularly (which

> looks great on paper). Plus I took the " Vision for Life " course and

> exercise regularly. Part of the problem is that is sit in front of a

> computer for 12 hours a day.

>

> By UV blockers... do you mean eyeglasses with UV filters? There are

> pros and cons on that as you must be aware.

>

> Regards, Jim

>

> Narby wrote:

>

> > 728hz Works for me.

> >

> > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

> >

> > Jim wrote:

> > >

> > > & Dave:

> > >

> > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> > >

> > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> > > wish my vision were still as good.

> > >

> > > Regards, Jim

> > >

> > > Brown wrote:

> > >

> > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > > >

> > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone

> band, but

> > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > > >

> > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > > sub-sonic?

> > > > >

> > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > closer

> > > > >to the right frequency.

> > > > >

> > > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Hi:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a

> foot) in

> > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that

> I saw

> > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11

> meters).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> > > Also,

> > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > > that each

> > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> > > apart

> > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> > > Valone

> > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it

> > is how

> > > > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> > > stuff and

> > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of

> keeping

> > > > for a

> > > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

September 4, 2006

Hunter gatherers don't tend to live that long, unfortunately.

http://www.disability.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Aboriginal_health_i\

ssues?open

steve wrote:

>

> I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch

> about

> eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative

> but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather

> peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with

> either skin

> cancer or eye sight.

>

> My 3 cents.

>

> --

>

> Steve - dudescholar2@... <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>

>

> " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. "

> --Voltaire

>

> On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote:

> > 728hz Works for me.

> >

> > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

> >

> > Jim wrote:

> > > & Dave:

> > >

> > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> > >

> > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> > > wish my vision were still as good.

> > >

> > > Regards, Jim

> > >

> > > Brown wrote:

> > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > > >

> > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone

> band, but

> > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > > >

> > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > >

> > > sub-sonic?

> > >

> > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > > > > closer to the right frequency.

> > > > >

> > > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > > Hi:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a

> foot) in

> > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that

> I saw

> > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11

> meters).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> > >

> > > Also,

> > >

> > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > >

> > > that each

> > >

> > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> > >

> > > apart

> > >

> > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> > >

> > > Valone

> > >

> > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is

> > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> > >

> > > stuff and

> > >

> > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of

> keeping

> > > >

> > > > for a

> > > >

> > > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > >

>

--

This is your brain on politics:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060131092225.htm

Yep! You've been an annoying zombie all these years.

September 4, 2006

TTBOMK, a Beta rod triggers the Alpha rod to achieve a " Giant Pulse " .

And you certainly established your bona fides by knowing what

" Gillettes " meant! : D

My friend is the engineer for the Physics department at my old

university. He's described his career as mostly spent re-designing grad

student's experiments so they would actually work. I think you and he

would probably have some interesting stories to swap.

Brown wrote:

>

> Hi:

>

> I've played with lasers a bit too. I founded an optical telecom

> company sending a gazillion phone conversations on fiber, we sold

> over a $B/year within 5 years. I used laser activated florescence

> for medical imaging and sensing at high speed. I built a ruby laser

> when I was in high school, using homemade capacitors with aluminum

> foil and glass sheets - huge - but the later ones were all much

> smaller including all the power supplies and capacitors.

>

> What is an alpha rod or a beta rod? Are these weapons terms? I'm

> not familiar with that. Boy and " Gillette " (meaning how many razor

> blades you can penetrate with a laser) is a very old vernacular term

> mainly used by early laser technicians working with military

> applications if my memory serves me well. None of my work ever

> involved that terminology. Lasers used in medicine and telecom, even

> for surgery or dental work are not that powerful.

>

> What does this guy do now? Where did he study physics?

>

> At 10:54 AM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

>

> >I don't know enough to explain it.

> >

> >However, this person's personal expertise happens to be lasers. He's

> >the type of guy who will (for instance) obtain alpha and beta rods from

> >a now-defunct top secret high energy laser research program, accumulate

> >enough half-gallon sized capacitors to fill up half a pickup truck bed,

> >and then construct a " giant pulse " laser... Just to see how many

> > " Gillettes " he can achieve. What this means is that he's forgotten more

> >about rectifying, polarizing, interfering, and otherwise screwing with

> >light than we will probably ever know.

> >

> >Besides, the inventor is still alive, and a functioning model is

> >available for inspection. That will answer all questions.

> >

> > Brown wrote:

> > >

> > > Hey Dave:

> > >

> > > Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this

> > > multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what

> > > basis did he think it could be plausible?

> > >

> > > >Hey ,

> > > >

> > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the

> > > > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving,

> > > >all knowing God.

> > > >

> > > >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested

> in. The

> > > >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further

> > > >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the

> > > >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest

> more.

> > > >

> > > >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly

> > > >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real

> > > >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely

> > > >informative).

> > > >

> > > >Dave

> > > >

September 4, 2006

Hi:

700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in

the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw

were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters).

Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

>

>De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

>Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

>interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also,

>have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each

>cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart

>and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone

>mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

>

>Regards, Jim

>

>. For example, why is this RF good and all

>

> > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and

> > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a

> > while longer?

> >

>

September 5, 2006

No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

dogs can hear to 45 KHz

700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but

it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

>It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be sub-sonic?

>

>It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be closer

>to the right frequency.

>

> Brown wrote:

> >

> > Hi:

> >

> > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in

> > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw

> > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters).

> >

> > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> >

> > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also,

> > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each

> > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart

> > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone

> > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > >

> > >Regards, Jim

> > >

> > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > >

> > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and

> > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a

> > > > while longer?

> > > >

> > >

September 5, 2006

Hey Dave:

Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this

multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what

basis did he think it could be plausible?

>Hey ,

>

> > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the

> > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

> >

>

>I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving,

>all knowing God.

>

>The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested in. The

>fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further

>investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the

>operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest more.

>

>Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly

>seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real

>time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely

>informative).

>

>Dave

>

September 5, 2006

Dave:

You should know by now that I can't type :0)

Of course it is 7000hz. Sorry bout that.

Jim

> It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be sub-sonic?

>

> It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be closer

> to the right frequency.

>

> Brown wrote:

> >

> > Hi:

> >

> > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in

> > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw

> > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters).

> >

> > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> >

> > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> >

> > >

> > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also,

> > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each

> > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart

> > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone

> > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > >

> > >Regards, Jim

> > >

> > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > >

> > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and

> > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a

> > > > while longer?

> > > >

> > >

September 5, 2006

& Dave:

is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

wish my vision were still as good.

Regards, Jim

Brown wrote:

> No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> dogs can hear to 45 KHz

>

> 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but

> it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

>

> At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

>

> >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be sub-sonic?

> >

> >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be closer

> >to the right frequency.

> >

> > Brown wrote:

> > >

> > > Hi:

> > >

> > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in

> > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw

> > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters).

> > >

> > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > >

> > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it. Also,

> > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed that each

> > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it apart

> > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally, Valone

> > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > >

> > > >Regards, Jim

> > > >

> > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > >

> > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and

> > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping

> for a

> > > > > while longer?

> > > > >

> > > >

September 5, 2006

I don't know about 714x, but the Rife machine is snake oil IMNSHO. Many

patients of mine have used Rife machines and I have never ever been able to

discern any benefit. This includes a man who died of cancer who used the

machine for over two years on a very serious and regular manner.

Hans

On 9/4/06, Brown <scotflyr@...> wrote:

>

> Hi:

>

> In reviewing the <http://www.cerbe.com/>Gaston site, I found the sale

> of the cancer therapeutic agent, 714-X, to be injected into lymph

> nodes or inhaled, to be quite

> interesting.

> <

>

http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3>This

>

> review by the National cancer institute is straightforwardly stated

> and fairly unbiased. Does anyone know anything about 714X? I found

> some glowing testimonials about it but also some reports that Gaston

> is insane. How would I know who's right? You can purchase the

> injectable from the web site for

> <https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta.html>$300. This is a far cry

> from the pulsed RF resonant device that supposedly kills all the bad

> microbes.... 714X is supposed to enable your immune system to work

> better to recognize and kill cancer cells. Conceptually, that is

> great and it is how many other alternative therapies say that they

> work, like the Gearson therapy.

>

> Personally, I'm not ready to try either the RF device or 714X without

> a lot more verification. For example, why is this RF good and all

> other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and

> not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a

> while longer? I don't have the foggiest idea how 714X or Rife's 500

> Watt RF transmitter aimed at my body work.

>

> If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the

> technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

>

September 5, 2006

Hans:

There have been many inferior replications of his original. They talk

about it in the video and also Ton Valone talks about it. Many of the

recent spin-offs are directed at well being rather than curing disease.

Tom Valone in his talk at the Tesla Conference said that we can get

antioxidants much more readily via vibratory frequency than through

digestion. He makes a good case. I figure that the answer probably

rests in doing both. Can you get too many antioxidants? I should have

overdosed by now if so, by my measurements.

:

Check out these links on Dr. Eskeland's new Testosterone enhancing

extract (on the cover of Swanson's catalog)(by the way, I agree with

your assessment of the company) :

http://www.rgglife.com/index.asp?id=5 & press=10

<http://www.rgglife.com/index.asp?id=5 & press=10>

http://www.petting-zoo.net/~deadbeef/archive/512.html

<http://www.petting-zoo.net/%7Edeadbeef/archive/512.html>

Kind Regards, Jim

Using an inferior machine over two years is definitely snake oil

Conser wrote:

> I don't know about 714x, but the Rife machine is snake oil IMNSHO. Many

> patients of mine have used Rife machines and I have never ever been

> able to

> discern any benefit. This includes a man who died of cancer who used the

> machine for over two years on a very serious and regular manner.

>

> Hans

>

> On 9/4/06, Brown <scotflyr@...

> <mailto:scotflyr%40pacbell.net>> wrote:

> >

> > Hi:

> >

> > In reviewing the <http://www.cerbe.com/

> <http://www.cerbe.com/>>Gaston site, I found the sale

> > of the cancer therapeutic agent, 714-X, to be injected into lymph

> > nodes or inhaled, to be quite

> > interesting.

> > <

> >

> http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3

>

<http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3>>Thi\

s

> >

> > review by the National cancer institute is straightforwardly stated

> > and fairly unbiased. Does anyone know anything about 714X? I found

> > some glowing testimonials about it but also some reports that Gaston

> > is insane. How would I know who's right? You can purchase the

> > injectable from the web site for

> > <https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta.html

> <https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta.html>>$300. This is a far cry

> > from the pulsed RF resonant device that supposedly kills all the bad

> > microbes.... 714X is supposed to enable your immune system to work

> > better to recognize and kill cancer cells. Conceptually, that is

> > great and it is how many other alternative therapies say that they

> > work, like the Gearson therapy.

> >

> > Personally, I'm not ready to try either the RF device or 714X without

> > a lot more verification. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and

> > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a

> > while longer? I don't have the foggiest idea how 714X or Rife's 500

> > Watt RF transmitter aimed at my body work.

> >

> > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the

> > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

> >

September 5, 2006

Dave:

I have taken Bilberry, eaten a fist full of blueberries every day for

the last ten years, and take Dr. 's eye formula regularly (which

looks great on paper). Plus I took the " Vision for Life " course and

exercise regularly. Part of the problem is that is sit in front of a

computer for 12 hours a day.

By UV blockers... do you mean eyeglasses with UV filters? There are

pros and cons on that as you must be aware.

Regards, Jim

Narby wrote:

> 728hz Works for me.

>

> AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

>

> Jim wrote:

> >

> > & Dave:

> >

> > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> >

> > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> > wish my vision were still as good.

> >

> > Regards, Jim

> >

> > Brown wrote:

> >

> > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > >

> > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but

> > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > >

> > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > >

> > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > sub-sonic?

> > > >

> > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> closer

> > > >to the right frequency.

> > > >

> > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Hi:

> > > > >

> > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in

> > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw

> > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters).

> > > > >

> > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > >

> > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> > Also,

> > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > that each

> > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> > apart

> > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> > Valone

> > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > >

> > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > >

> > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it

> is how

> > > > > > > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> > stuff and

> > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping

> > > for a

> > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

September 5, 2006

I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch about

eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative

but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather

peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with either skin

cancer or eye sight.

My 3 cents.

--

Steve - dudescholar2@...

" It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. "

--Voltaire

On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote:

> 728hz Works for me.

>

> AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

>

> Jim wrote:

> > & Dave:

> >

> > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> >

> > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> > wish my vision were still as good.

> >

> > Regards, Jim

> >

> > Brown wrote:

> > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > >

> > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but

> > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > >

> > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> >

> > sub-sonic?

> >

> > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > > > closer to the right frequency.

> > > >

> > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > Hi:

> > > > >

> > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in

> > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw

> > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters).

> > > > >

> > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > >

> > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> >

> > Also,

> >

> > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> >

> > that each

> >

> > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> >

> > apart

> >

> > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> >

> > Valone

> >

> > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > >

> > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > >

> > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is

> > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> >

> > stuff and

> >

> > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping

> > >

> > > for a

> > >

> > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > >

September 5, 2006

Hi:

I've played with lasers a bit too. I founded an optical telecom

company sending a gazillion phone conversations on fiber, we sold

over a $B/year within 5 years. I used laser activated florescence

for medical imaging and sensing at high speed. I built a ruby laser

when I was in high school, using homemade capacitors with aluminum

foil and glass sheets - huge - but the later ones were all much

smaller including all the power supplies and capacitors.

What is an alpha rod or a beta rod? Are these weapons terms? I'm

not familiar with that. Boy and " Gillette " (meaning how many razor

blades you can penetrate with a laser) is a very old vernacular term

mainly used by early laser technicians working with military

applications if my memory serves me well. None of my work ever

involved that terminology. Lasers used in medicine and telecom, even

for surgery or dental work are not that powerful.

What does this guy do now? Where did he study physics?

At 10:54 AM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

>I don't know enough to explain it.

>

>However, this person's personal expertise happens to be lasers. He's

>the type of guy who will (for instance) obtain alpha and beta rods from

>a now-defunct top secret high energy laser research program, accumulate

>enough half-gallon sized capacitors to fill up half a pickup truck bed,

>and then construct a " giant pulse " laser... Just to see how many

> " Gillettes " he can achieve. What this means is that he's forgotten more

>about rectifying, polarizing, interfering, and otherwise screwing with

>light than we will probably ever know.

>

>Besides, the inventor is still alive, and a functioning model is

>available for inspection. That will answer all questions.

>

> Brown wrote:

> >

> > Hey Dave:

> >

> > Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this

> > multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what

> > basis did he think it could be plausible?

> >

> > >Hey ,

> > >

> > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the

> > > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

> > > >

> > >

> > >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving,

> > >all knowing God.

> > >

> > >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested in. The

> > >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further

> > >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the

> > >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest more.

> > >

> > >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly

> > >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real

> > >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely

> > >informative).

> > >

> > >Dave

> > >

September 5, 2006

Hi

I read a book a number of years ago

" <http://www.amazon.com/Health-Light-Effects-Natural-Artificial/dp/0898040981>He\

alth

and Light " by Ott, the person who did Disney's time-lapse

pictures of fruit ripening and flowers blooming. They tried putting

fruit into Plexiglass boxes so that they wouldn't move as they

ripened and they just got bigger but never changed color to ripen

because they were shielded from the UV. They had to get a special

glass that passed UV for the fruit and flowers to blossom or

ripen. He later got eye problems and remembering his experience with

time-lapse and plants, used it to heal his eyes with natural

sunlight. Too much can cause problems too, in my opinion. Dr

, an herbalist with whom I studied, claims to have cured

skin cancer with sunlight.

I have a bad experience. I had a pterygium - a red, vascular growth

on the surface of my eye caused by excessive exposure to the sun. Of

course, maybe it was because I stopped going out in the sun, but I

doubt it. I lived on the beach and went out to the beach

everyday. My skin has sun damage too, partly corrected by good

moisturizers. I had the pterygium surgically removed so that I could

wear contact lenses.

Moderation anyone?

At 02:18 PM 9/5/2006, you wrote:

>I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch about

>eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative

>but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather

>peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with either skin

>cancer or eye sight.

>

>My 3 cents.

>

>--

>

>Steve - <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>dudescholar2@...

>

> " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. "

>--Voltaire

>

>On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote:

> > 728hz Works for me.

> >

> > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

> >

> > Jim wrote:

> > > & Dave:

> > >

> > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> > >

> > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> > > wish my vision were still as good.

> > >

> > > Regards, Jim

> > >

> > > Brown wrote:

> > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > > >

> > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone band, but

> > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > > >

> > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > >

> > > sub-sonic?

> > >

> > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > > > > closer to the right frequency.

> > > > >

> > > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > > Hi:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a foot) in

> > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that I saw

> > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11 meters).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> > >

> > > Also,

> > >

> > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > >

> > > that each

> > >

> > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> > >

> > > apart

> > >

> > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> > >

> > > Valone

> > >

> > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is

> > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> > >

> > > stuff and

> > >

> > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping

> > > >

> > > > for a

> > > >

> > > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > >

>

September 5, 2006

Hi:

Personally the physics involved with supposedly selectively

" exploding " cancer cells, but not normal cells through resonance

seems like black magic to me. I'm a major doubter until and unless I

see it and fully understand it. None of the explanations sounds

plausible to me.

At 10:24 AM 9/5/2006, you wrote:

>I don't know about 714x, but the Rife machine is snake oil IMNSHO. Many

>patients of mine have used Rife machines and I have never ever been able to

>discern any benefit. This includes a man who died of cancer who used the

>machine for over two years on a very serious and regular manner.

>

>Hans

>

>On 9/4/06, Brown

><<mailto:scotflyr%40pacbell.net>scotflyr@...> wrote:

> >

> > Hi:

> >

> > In reviewing the

> <<http://www.cerbe.com/>http://www.cerbe.com/>Gaston site, I found the sale

> > of the cancer therapeutic agent, 714-X, to be injected into lymph

> > nodes or inhaled, to be quite

> > interesting.

> > <

> >

>

<http://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3>http\

://www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/714-X/HealthProfessional/page3>This

> >

> > review by the National cancer institute is straightforwardly stated

> > and fairly unbiased. Does anyone know anything about 714X? I found

> > some glowing testimonials about it but also some reports that Gaston

> > is insane. How would I know who's right? You can purchase the

> > injectable from the web site for

> >

>

<<https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta.html>https://secure.cerbe.com/orders_inta\

..html>$300.

> This is a far cry

> > from the pulsed RF resonant device that supposedly kills all the bad

> > microbes.... 714X is supposed to enable your immune system to work

> > better to recognize and kill cancer cells. Conceptually, that is

> > great and it is how many other alternative therapies say that they

> > work, like the Gearson therapy.

> >

> > Personally, I'm not ready to try either the RF device or 714X without

> > a lot more verification. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is how

> > microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad stuff and

> > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of keeping for a

> > while longer? I don't have the foggiest idea how 714X or Rife's 500

> > Watt RF transmitter aimed at my body work.

> >

> > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the

> > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

> >

September 5, 2006

Hi:

I once considered building a concealed CO2 laser in my car with a

targeting system to do nasty things like blowing out the tires of

cars that do bad things in traffic. I decided it was doable but that

I wasn't that type of person, it was just a passing fancy one day in

traffic going to work in Silicon Valley.

At 03:23 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

>TTBOMK, a Beta rod triggers the Alpha rod to achieve a " Giant Pulse " .

>And you certainly established your bona fides by knowing what

> " Gillettes " meant! : D

>

>My friend is the engineer for the Physics department at my old

>university. He's described his career as mostly spent re-designing grad

>student's experiments so they would actually work. I think you and he

>would probably have some interesting stories to swap.

>

> Brown wrote:

> >

> > Hi:

> >

> > I've played with lasers a bit too. I founded an optical telecom

> > company sending a gazillion phone conversations on fiber, we sold

> > over a $B/year within 5 years. I used laser activated florescence

> > for medical imaging and sensing at high speed. I built a ruby laser

> > when I was in high school, using homemade capacitors with aluminum

> > foil and glass sheets - huge - but the later ones were all much

> > smaller including all the power supplies and capacitors.

> >

> > What is an alpha rod or a beta rod? Are these weapons terms? I'm

> > not familiar with that. Boy and " Gillette " (meaning how many razor

> > blades you can penetrate with a laser) is a very old vernacular term

> > mainly used by early laser technicians working with military

> > applications if my memory serves me well. None of my work ever

> > involved that terminology. Lasers used in medicine and telecom, even

> > for surgery or dental work are not that powerful.

> >

> > What does this guy do now? Where did he study physics?

> >

> > At 10:54 AM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> >

> > >I don't know enough to explain it.

> > >

> > >However, this person's personal expertise happens to be lasers. He's

> > >the type of guy who will (for instance) obtain alpha and beta rods from

> > >a now-defunct top secret high energy laser research program, accumulate

> > >enough half-gallon sized capacitors to fill up half a pickup truck bed,

> > >and then construct a " giant pulse " laser... Just to see how many

> > > " Gillettes " he can achieve. What this means is that he's forgotten more

> > >about rectifying, polarizing, interfering, and otherwise screwing with

> > >light than we will probably ever know.

> > >

> > >Besides, the inventor is still alive, and a functioning model is

> > >available for inspection. That will answer all questions.

> > >

> > > Brown wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Hey Dave:

> > > >

> > > > Did this physics expert really thoroughly understand what this

> > > > multiple frequency light was doing and how it was mixed? On what

> > > > basis did he think it could be plausible?

> > > >

> > > > >Hey ,

> > > > >

> > > > > > If you don't have first-hand experience or understanding of the

> > > > > > technology or tried this, why do you believe in it?

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >I don't *believe* in anything, except the existence of an all loving,

> > > > >all knowing God.

> > > > >

> > > > >The *science* on the other hand, I'm only extremely interested

> > in. The

> > > > >fact that the microscope is revolutionary is enough cause for further

> > > > >investigation, and the fact that an expert in physics told me the

> > > > >operating principles behind it were sound just piques my interest

> > more.

> > > > >

> > > > >Even if it turns out that Somatid theory is all wet, he's certainly

> > > > >seeing *something*. Perhaps it's sub-cellular unmaintained in real

> > > > >time, but even that would be amazing to see (and perhaps extremely

> > > > >informative).

> > > > >

> > > > >Dave

> > > > >

September 6, 2006

Steve:

I had an aunt who used to make frozen jams using fresh berries and

gelatin with no sugar added. They tasted great and certainly were equal

to fresh berries in most respects Bet you concur given that, huh? No

question that refined sugar is not a good food additive and I almost

never touch the stuff..

Regards, Jim

wrote:

> I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch

> about

> eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative

> but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather

> peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with

> either skin

> cancer or eye sight.

>

> My 3 cents.

>

> --

>

> Steve - dudescholar2@... <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>

>

> " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. "

> --Voltaire

>

> On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote:

> > 728hz Works for me.

> >

> > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

> >

> > Jim wrote:

> > > & Dave:

> > >

> > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> > >

> > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> > > wish my vision were still as good.

> > >

> > > Regards, Jim

> > >

> > > Brown wrote:

> > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > > >

> > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone

> band, but

> > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > > >

> > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > >

> > > sub-sonic?

> > >

> > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > > > > closer to the right frequency.

> > > > >

> > > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > > Hi:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a

> foot) in

> > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that

> I saw

> > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11

> meters).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> > >

> > > Also,

> > >

> > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > >

> > > that each

> > >

> > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> > >

> > > apart

> > >

> > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> > >

> > > Valone

> > >

> > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is

> > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> > >

> > > stuff and

> > >

> > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of

> keeping

> > > >

> > > > for a

> > > >

> > > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > >

>

September 6, 2006

Steve:

I had an aunt who used to make frozen jams using fresh berries and

gelatin with no sugar added. They tasted great and certainly were equal

to fresh berries in most respects Bet you concur given that, huh? No

question that refined sugar is not a good food additive and I almost

never touch the stuff..

Regards, Jim

wrote:

> I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch

> about

> eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative

> but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather

> peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with

> either skin

> cancer or eye sight.

>

> My 3 cents.

>

> --

>

> Steve - dudescholar2@... <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>

>

> " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. "

> --Voltaire

>

> On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote:

> > 728hz Works for me.

> >

> > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

> >

> > Jim wrote:

> > > & Dave:

> > >

> > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> > >

> > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at age 60

> > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure. I only

> > > wish my vision were still as good.

> > >

> > > Regards, Jim

> > >

> > > Brown wrote:

> > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > > >

> > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone

> band, but

> > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses. Maybe

> > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > > >

> > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > >

> > > sub-sonic?

> > >

> > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > > > > closer to the right frequency.

> > > > >

> > > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > > Hi:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a

> foot) in

> > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a 428 Km

> > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that

> I saw

> > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11

> meters).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book, " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a very

> > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it finish it.

> > >

> > > Also,

> > >

> > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > >

> > > that each

> > >

> > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that blows it

> > >

> > > apart

> > >

> > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment. Finally,

> > >

> > > Valone

> > >

> > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous, it is

> > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance kill bad

> > >

> > > stuff and

> > >

> > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of

> keeping

> > > >

> > > > for a

> > > >

> > > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > >

>

September 6, 2006

Dave:

Your conclusion regarding UV seems to fit current conclusions of those

who are paying attention.

Contemporary aboriginal people are probably not correctly categorized

as hunter gatherers, but I'd imagine that life as a bear hunter using

spears as weapons would be

fairly compacted. There was documentary on a group of people who lived

in the British Isles 8,000 years ago. They studied their bones which

were well preserved in crypts. The conclusion was that 25 years old was

average and the oldest found was 50 years old. The added conclusion

was that we have been doing better in last few hundred years in terms of

longevity. However, I am not convinced that a long life span is a real

answer, there is much more to it.

My nickel, Jim

Dave Narby wrote:

> Hunter gatherers don't tend to live that long, unfortunately.

>

http://www.disability.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Aboriginal_health_i\

ssues?open

>

<http://www.disability.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Aboriginal_health_\

issues?open>

>

> steve wrote:

> >

> > I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch

> > about

> > eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a

> negative

> > but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather

> > peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with

> > either skin

> > cancer or eye sight.

> >

> > My 3 cents.

> >

> > --

> >

> > Steve - dudescholar2@...

> <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>

> >

> > " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. "

> > --Voltaire

> >

> > On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote:

> > > 728hz Works for me.

> > >

> > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

> > >

> > > Jim wrote:

> > > > & Dave:

> > > >

> > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> > > >

> > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at

> age 60

> > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure.

> I only

> > > > wish my vision were still as good.

> > > >

> > > > Regards, Jim

> > > >

> > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > > > >

> > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone

> > band, but

> > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses.

> Maybe

> > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > > > >

> > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > > >

> > > > sub-sonic?

> > > >

> > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > > > > > closer to the right frequency.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > > > Hi:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a

> > foot) in

> > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a

> 428 Km

> > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines that

> > I saw

> > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11

> > meters).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book,

> " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a

> very

> > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it

> finish it.

> > > >

> > > > Also,

> > > >

> > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > > >

> > > > that each

> > > >

> > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that

> blows it

> > > >

> > > > apart

> > > >

> > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment.

> Finally,

> > > >

> > > > Valone

> > > >

> > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous,

> it is

> > > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance

> kill bad

> > > >

> > > > stuff and

> > > >

> > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of

> > keeping

> > > > >

> > > > > for a

> > > > >

> > > > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > > >

> >

>

> --

> This is your brain on politics:

>

> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060131092225.htm

> <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060131092225.htm>

>

> Yep! You've been an annoying zombie all these years.

>

September 6, 2006

:

Plexiglas?

I have an 80 year old friend who has the eyes of a 30 yr old. He looks

directly into the sun to dilate his eyes every day that the sun is

shinning... works for him.

Many others now claim that sunlight cures skin cancer and sun screen

causes it... Dr. Mercola is one. One observation is that melanomas

most often occur in the middle of the back and bottoms of feet where the

sun never generally goes. There is also the argument that Vit D is a

deterrent to many cancers and the observation that dark skinned people

get less of it from sunlight and thus show negative effects in terms of

certain cancers and other diseases.

Jim

Brown wrote:

> Hi

>

> I read a book a number of years ago

> " <http://www.amazon.com/Health-Light-Effects-Natural-Artificial/dp/0898040981

>

<http://www.amazon.com/Health-Light-Effects-Natural-Artificial/dp/0898040981>>He\

alth

>

> and Light " by Ott, the person who did Disney's time-lapse

> pictures of fruit ripening and flowers blooming. They tried putting

> fruit into Plexiglass boxes so that they wouldn't move as they

> ripened and they just got bigger but never changed color to ripen

> because they were shielded from the UV. They had to get a special

> glass that passed UV for the fruit and flowers to blossom or

> ripen. He later got eye problems and remembering his experience with

> time-lapse and plants, used it to heal his eyes with natural

> sunlight. Too much can cause problems too, in my opinion. Dr

> , an herbalist with whom I studied, claims to have cured

> skin cancer with sunlight.

>

> I have a bad experience. I had a pterygium - a red, vascular growth

> on the surface of my eye caused by excessive exposure to the sun. Of

> course, maybe it was because I stopped going out in the sun, but I

> doubt it. I lived on the beach and went out to the beach

> everyday. My skin has sun damage too, partly corrected by good

> moisturizers. I had the pterygium surgically removed so that I could

> wear contact lenses.

>

> Moderation anyone?

>

> At 02:18 PM 9/5/2006, you wrote:

>

> >I concur on the dark berries but not on the jams. I know almost zilch

> about

> >eye exercises. On the other hand, I'm not convinced that UV is a negative

> >but that lack of UV may be a negative. I'm not aware that hunter gather

> >peoples who spend a lot of time in the sun ever had problems with

> either skin

> >cancer or eye sight.

> >

> >My 3 cents.

> >

> >--

> >

> >Steve -

> <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>dudescholar2@...

> <mailto:dudescholar2%40basicmail.net>

> >

> > " It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. "

> >--Voltaire

> >

> >On Monday 04 September 2006 11:46 am, Dave Narby wrote:

> > > 728hz Works for me.

> > >

> > > AFA your eyesight is concerned, you might try bilberry and other dark

> > > berry extracts and jams. If focusing is the problem, eye exercises

> > > work. I also wear UV blockers whenever I go outside.

> > >

> > > Jim wrote:

> > > > & Dave:

> > > >

> > > > is correct.. I had to go back to Tom Valone's book... you guys

> > > > were messing with my mind. My Gingko Biloba was not kicking in. The

> > > > actual number that Tom Valone posted in his book is 728 Hz..

> > > >

> > > > I could still hear 20 to 20,000 Hz when I checked my hearing at

> age 60

> > > > and I don't think that it has fallen since. The Dr. that checked it

> > > > was amazed... he recalibrated his instrument just to make sure.

> I only

> > > > wish my vision were still as good.

> > > >

> > > > Regards, Jim

> > > >

> > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > No, middle C in the center of the piano keyboard is 440 Hz and a

> > > > > healthy young person can hear from about 20Hz to about 20 KHz and

> > > > > dogs can hear to 45 KHz

> > > > >

> > > > > 700 MHz is more like it, almost near the 800 MHz cell phone

> band, but

> > > > > it is doubtful that it is a fixed or simple sine wave from a brief

> > > > > scan of the literature it is a series of modulated RF pulses.

> Maybe

> > > > > the 700 Hz has something to do with the way it is modulated.

> > > > >

> > > > > At 05:58 PM 9/3/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > >It wouldn't... Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 700hz be

> > > >

> > > > sub-sonic?

> > > >

> > > > > >It might be a decimal point error. 700mhz seems like it would be

> > > > > > closer to the right frequency.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Brown wrote:

> > > > > > > Hi:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 700 Hz?? Wow, that wavelength is about 428 kilometers in the

> > > > > > > electromagnetic spectrum and about 40 cm (a little over a

> foot) in

> > > > > > > the sonic wave in water (human body) domain. How would a

> 428 Km

> > > > > > > wavelength resonate in the human body? All the machines

> that I saw

> > > > > > > were running on 27 MHz (citizen's band) frequencies - ~11

> meters).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Do you have the U-Tube link? I'd love to watch it.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 9/4/2006, you wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >De. Tom Valone discusses this in his book,

> " Bioelectromagnetic

> > > > > > > >Healing. " I am not finished reading it, but so far, its a

> very

> > > > > > > >interesting read. Maybe I'll have an answer once it

> finish it.

> > > >

> > > > Also,

> > > >

> > > > > > > >have you watched the Rife documentary in U Tube? He claimed

> > > >

> > > > that each

> > > >

> > > > > > > >cell type and each microorganism has a frequency that

> blows it

> > > >

> > > > apart

> > > >

> > > > > > > >and the video even shows it happening in one segment.

> Finally,

> > > >

> > > > Valone

> > > >

> > > > > > > >mentions a universal healing frequency at 700+ Hz for humans

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >Regards, Jim

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >. For example, why is this RF good and all

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > other EMI/RFI bad? Resonance is potentially dangerous,

> it is

> > > > > > > > > how microwaves heat food. Why would this resonance

> kill bad

> > > >

> > > > stuff and

> > > >

> > > > > > > > > not good stuff, like the brain cells that I'm fond of

> keeping

> > > > >

> > > > > for a

> > > > >

> > > > > > > > > while longer?

> > > > > > > >

> >

>

Sign In

Re: 714-X Cancer Treatment

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Share this post

Link to post

Share on other sites

Guest guest