Guest guest Posted October 4, 2004 Report Share Posted October 4, 2004 There is much legend about, and focus on, the scoby but it's not the reason I brew. I brew for the tea and use the tea for the restart for the next batch . The only real value I've found in the scoby is in the new one forming at the top as this helps seal the brew from airborne stuff and preserve the fizz. If I want flat tea the scoby has no functional value but I like to bottle it and have a champagney fizz, so I let the scoby form and hold in the effervessence during the brewing process. BTW, I tried brewing on top of the refrigerator, but the vibration of the running fridge let the fizz out. Having said all that, there is an argument for a better fizz from a 'dirty brew', that has lots of scoby stuff in it. I have not found this to be the case but some swear by it. I've brewed dozens in a row with clear starter and no scoby. However, maybe I'm losing something that I don't know about. Does anyone have any studies about the need for scoby to rebrew? rusty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2004 Report Share Posted October 4, 2004 Rusty, I don't think anyone has done a study or research on SCOBY DO or SCOBY DON'T. Many have wondered the same thing, myself included. But whenever it is discussed, I believe the bottom line is always that because we don't know,it's best to use both just to be sure nothing is lost. Who knows, maybe after Roussin recoups his costs from his past research, Maybe this will be one of the things he might address in future research. [That's just a tiny hint ] Luv, Sprite " When you drink the water, remember the spring. " Chinese proverb Check out my Kombucha Information page, it has links to all kinds of KT info and more: <A HREF= " http://www.geocities.com/ladyfangs.geo/Page5.html " >Sprite's Kombucha Page</A> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 rusty, I use only brewed KT to start a new batch (I do not put in a SCOBY). This works every time. I, also, brew KT for the health benefits of drinking the tea. As cute as a SCOBY is, to me it is merely a by-product of brewing. I do not mean to offend any of you folks who have an adoration for the SCOBY, I only mean to say that I brew with an emphasis on the tea, not the SCOBY. huehue > There is much legend about, and focus on, the scoby but it's not the reason > I brew. > I brew for the tea and use the tea for the restart for the next batch . The > only real value I've found in the scoby is in the new one forming at the top > as this helps seal the brew from airborne stuff and preserve the fizz. If I > want flat tea the scoby has no functional value but I like to bottle it and > have a champagney fizz, so I let the scoby form and hold in the > effervessence during the brewing process. BTW, I tried brewing on top of > the refrigerator, but the vibration of the running fridge let the fizz out. > Having said all that, there is an argument for a better fizz from a > 'dirty brew', that has lots of scoby stuff in it. I have not found this to > be the case but some swear by it. I've brewed dozens in a row with clear > starter and no scoby. However, maybe I'm losing something that I don't know > about. Does anyone have any studies about the need for scoby to rebrew? > rusty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.