Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 I do not have a problem with this. If took a bit to get the oscilloscope set right but it works fine for me. I can look at the oscilloscope settings I use and post them if folks are interested On Aug 16, 2004, at 3:15 PM, Stephan Odermatt wrote: > stephen, > > i agree with you. it is more difficult to see a good signal in > bioexplorer' oscilloscope, than it is in the brainmaster software. > i am just using the checktrode to test electrode-impedance. if the > impedance is clearly below 10kohms, then i tend to see it as a good > signal. > i know from other bioexplorer-users who previously worked with the > brainmaster-software, who at first launch the brainmaster-software, > just to test the signal, and then switch over to bioexplorer. not > very elegant, imo, but seems to be a possible way. > just my two cents. > > best > > stephan odermatt, switzerland > > >> When using Brainmaster software it is easy to see the signal > quality >> by looking at the raw wave form, with the 'fish scales' wave form >> indicating poor signal. What does one use to judge signal quality >> with BE? >> >> SDC > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 , I'd like to see what you are doing with this. I've tried a variety of line speeds, but I still find it hard to see signal quality on the oscilloscope display. I use a meter to identify electro-magnetic interference, but picking up impedance problems hasn't been that easy. Pete Van DeusenBrainTrainer ()16246 SW 92nd Ave, Miami, FL 33157305/321-1595 Re: Re: signal quality I do not have a problem with this. If took a bit to get the oscilloscope set right but it works fine for me. I can look at the oscilloscope settings I use and post them if folks are interested Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 Pete, I'll look at my settings tomorrow at the office.; It is not speed I changed but the sensitivity. On Aug 16, 2004, at 4:09 PM, Van Deusen wrote: > , > > I'd like to see what you are doing with this. I've tried a variety of > line speeds, but I still find it hard to see signal quality on the > oscilloscope display. I use a meter to identify electro-magnetic > interference, but picking up impedance problems hasn't been that easy. > > Pete > > Van Deusen > BrainTrainer () > 16246 SW 92nd Ave, Miami, FL 33157 > 305/321-1595 > > > Re: Re: signal quality > > I do not have a problem with this. If took a bit to get the > oscilloscope set right but it works fine for me. I can look at the > oscilloscope settings I use and post them if folks are interested > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 george, yes, please do post your settings. i am very much interested about them. i changed sensitivity to 240u, which i believe are the brainmaster settings, but it did not help that much. thanks stephan odermatt, switzerland > I do not have a problem with this. If took a bit to get the > oscilloscope set right but it works fine for me. I can look at the > oscilloscope settings I use and post them if folks are interested > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.