Guest guest Posted December 3, 2004 Report Share Posted December 3, 2004 Sal, I don't open strange attachments, even from people I know. Did this message come from you? Can you put the info in the body of the message? Foxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2004 Report Share Posted December 3, 2004 Foxx, yes, this did come from me. I sent it two times since it appears the first time did not get sent. Leon --- Foxx <foxx@...> wrote: > Sal, > > I don't open strange attachments, even from people I > know. Did this > message come from you? Can you put the info in the > body of the message? > > Foxx > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2004 Report Share Posted December 5, 2004 Sara, You asked: Does a F7-P7 protocol mean that F7 active and p7 ref? That would usually be what it means. You asked: For dyslexia(visual), in the workshop 3 notes, the protocol is defined as F7-P7 SMR up and/or beta up, theta down. In the same workshop notes, it says not to train SMR in the left hemisphere. What is the right protocol? I'm not sure what workshop that was (I just learned where P7 was from Rosemary yesterday), since I've never heard of that protocol. Certainly the area between P3 and T4 (and on the other side P4 and T6) is often indicated in learning disabilities, but my inclination is to look at the sites and see what appears to be blocking activation (sometimes alpha, sometimes theta and delta). As you may recall, I prefer to train down slower activity (or use a windowed squash leaving out the range I'd like to see increase) rather than pushing up beta. You asked: On several of my TLC assessments, I have seen Alpha and Beta coherence values EC in the single digits or even a fraction of l.0. Does this make sense. Is the data bad? It does sound a little strange. Low beta coherence values are fine, and I've seen low alpha coherence in a number of clients, but usually that would be in the teens or twenties. Which software are you using? You asked: In some cases, the alpha coherence EC is within the range of 40-70 or maybe a little less, but the beta coherence is less than 10. Does that make sense or is the data bad? No, that would be pretty reasonable. It sounds as if you may be using 1.9A BrainMaster software, though. Is that correct? Pete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 Hi Pete, I don't believe I am using 1.9 Software - I had my program revised early in the year when 2.0 came out and again recently using 2.0SE. Samar and I are also looking at the TLC to make sure we are not in the BE format. Many of the TLC's done are indicating single digits or a fraction of l.0 Alpha/Beta Coherence EC. The rest of the data appears to be fine (we think) What do you suggest? We are wondering if the data is bad. I sure wouldn't like to repeat the TLC with these clients - Please advise - we're lost. & Samar --- Van Deusen <pvdtlc@...> wrote: > Sara, > > > You asked: > Does a F7-P7 protocol mean that F7 active and p7 > ref? > > That would usually be what it means. > > You asked: > For dyslexia(visual), in the workshop 3 notes, the > protocol is defined as F7-P7 SMR up and/or beta up, > theta down. In the same workshop notes, it says not > to train SMR in the left hemisphere. What is the > right protocol? > > I'm not sure what workshop that was (I just learned > where P7 was from Rosemary yesterday), since I've > never heard of that protocol. Certainly the area > between P3 and T4 (and on the other side P4 and T6) > is often indicated in learning disabilities, but my > inclination is to look at the sites and see what > appears to be blocking activation (sometimes alpha, > sometimes theta and delta). As you may recall, I > prefer to train down slower activity (or use a > windowed squash leaving out the range I'd like to > see increase) rather than pushing up beta. > > You asked: > On several of my TLC assessments, I have seen > Alpha and Beta coherence values EC in the single > digits or even a fraction of l.0. Does this make > sense. Is the data bad? > > It does sound a little strange. Low beta coherence > values are fine, and I've seen low alpha coherence > in a number of clients, but usually that would be in > the teens or twenties. Which software are you > using? > > You asked: > In some cases, the alpha coherence EC is within > the range of 40-70 or maybe a little less, but the > beta coherence is less than 10. Does that make > sense > or is the data bad? > > No, that would be pretty reasonable. It sounds as > if you may be using 1.9A BrainMaster software, > though. Is that correct? > > Pete > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2004 Report Share Posted December 9, 2004 , Please back channel me one or two of the assessments and let me take a look at them. Pete > > From: sal leon <sjl335@...> > Date: 2004/12/09 Thu PM 12:22:59 EST > > Subject: Re: Re: FWD questions > > Hi Pete, I don't believe I am using 1.9 Software - I had my program revised early in the year when 2.0 came out and again recently using 2.0SE. Samar and I are also looking at the TLC to make sure we are not in the BE format. Many of the TLC's done are indicating single digits or a fraction of l.0 Alpha/Beta Coherence EC. The rest of the data appears to be fine (we think) What do you suggest? We are wondering if the data is bad. I sure wouldn't like to repeat the TLC with these clients - Please advise - we're lost. & Samar Hi Pete, I don't believe I am using 1.9 Software - I had my program revised early in the year when 2.0 came out and again recently using 2.0SE. Samar and I are also looking at the TLC to make sure we are not in the BE format. Many of the TLC's done are indicating single digits or a fraction of l.0 Alpha/Beta Coherence EC. The rest of the data appears to be fine (we think) What do you suggest? We are wondering if the data is bad. I sure wouldn't like to repeat the TLC with these clients - Please advise - we're lost. & Samar --- Van Deusen <pvdtlc@...> wrote: > Sara, > > > You asked: > Does a F7-P7 protocol mean that F7 active and p7 > ref? > > That would usually be what it means. > > You asked: > For dyslexia(visual), in the workshop 3 notes, the > protocol is defined as F7-P7 SMR up and/or beta up, > theta down. In the same workshop notes, it says not > to train SMR in the left hemisphere. What is the > right protocol? > > I'm not sure what workshop that was (I just learned > where P7 was from Rosemary yesterday), since I've > never heard of that protocol. Certainly the area > between P3 and T4 (and on the other side P4 and T6) > is often indicated in learning disabilities, but my > inclination is to look at the sites and see what > appears to be blocking activation (sometimes alpha, > sometimes theta and delta). As you may recall, I > prefer to train down slower activity (or use a > windowed squash leaving out the range I'd like to > see increase) rather than pushing up beta. > > You asked: > On several of my TLC assessments, I have seen > Alpha and Beta coherence values EC in the single > digits or even a fraction of l.0. Does this make > sense. Is the data bad? > > It does sound a little strange. Low beta coherence > values are fine, and I've seen low alpha coherence > in a number of clients, but usually that would be in > the teens or twenties. Which software are you > using? > > You asked: > In some cases, the alpha coherence EC is within > the range of 40-70 or maybe a little less, but the > beta coherence is less than 10. Does that make > sense > or is the data bad? > > No, that would be pretty reasonable. It sounds as > if you may be using 1.9A BrainMaster software, > though. Is that correct? > > Pete > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.