Guest guest Posted November 3, 2004 Report Share Posted November 3, 2004 Lynn, This is a great question! I hope others will weigh in with their philosophy and experience, but here's my two cents worth. This pattern is exactly what a coach would see in a gymnast or a runner or swimmer. There is a period where the performance is solid and stable, then fatigue begins to set in and everything falls apart. The brain gets tired of sustaining a challenging state in the same way. My inclination would be to say that stopping right at the end of the plateau is likely to leave the client in a fairly solid place. That's good. However, it may also be true that it is by pushing through the deterioration that we really build stamina. My preference would be to pause the session when you see the plateau starting to break up, and then take a longer than usual break--maybe a couple minutes--and talk about how the client feels, if he has noticed the cool plateau, etc. Then I'd challenge him to try one more 2 minute stretch, to see if he can get back to that state and stay there for a short final period. I think that would be the best of both worlds. Pete > > From: " lynn_gibbons " <pgibbons@...> > Date: 2004/11/03 Wed PM 04:53:08 EST > > Subject: Watching the Trend line > > Hi, When training people for 20 mins in 2 minute intervals, I watch the trend line. About 3/4 of the way through the training I see a nice plateau that the client can keep going for about 2-5 minutes then it gets all wild again for say the last 3-5 minutes. Should I end the training as soon as it starts to get wild again, should I get them recentered and bring the levels down again and end it with a short plateau,or should I end it during that nice plateau before the 20 mins is up? My impression is I don't get a good report when I end it when it's wild but that may be biased because I'm looking for problems then. Does anyone have any experience with this? Thanks, Lynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2004 Report Share Posted November 3, 2004 So do you have an analogy/explanation for the reverse? I have been following the hibeta downtraining you suggested and particularly for P4.A2 15-38.Down EC, I am sometimes able to sustain a whole 5 minutes at some reasonably consistent level. I then take a break and when I start another session I sometimes find that my starting level is possibly twice that of where I finished, it then takes anywhere from 15 secs to 2 minutes to get back to lower level and the transition to that level is relatively immediate (rather than gradual). - Van Deusen wrote: > Lynn, > > This is a great question! I hope others will weigh in with their > philosophy and experience, but here's my two cents worth. > > This pattern is exactly what a coach would see in a gymnast or a > runner or swimmer. There is a period where the performance is solid > and stable, then fatigue begins to set in and everything falls apart. > The brain gets tired of sustaining a challenging state in the same > way. My inclination would be to say that stopping right at the end of > the plateau is likely to leave the client in a fairly solid place. > That's good. However, it may also be true that it is by pushing > through the deterioration that we really build stamina. > > My preference would be to pause the session when you see the plateau > starting to break up, and then take a longer than usual break--maybe a > couple minutes--and talk about how the client feels, if he has noticed > the cool plateau, etc. Then I'd challenge him to try one more 2 > minute stretch, to see if he can get back to that state and stay there > for a short final period. I think that would be the best of both worlds. > > Pete > > > > From: " lynn_gibbons " <pgibbons@...> > > Date: 2004/11/03 Wed PM 04:53:08 EST > > > > Subject: Watching the Trend line > > > > > > > Hi, > When training people for 20 mins in 2 minute intervals, I watch > the trend line. About 3/4 of the way through the training I see a > nice plateau that the client can keep going for about 2-5 minutes > then it gets all wild again for say the last 3-5 minutes. Should I > end the training as soon as it starts to get wild again, should I > get them recentered and bring the levels down again and end it with > a short plateau,or should I end it during that nice plateau before > the 20 mins is up? My impression is I don't get a good report when > I end it when it's wild but that may be biased because I'm looking > for problems then. Does anyone have any experience with this? > > Thanks, > Lynn > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2004 Report Share Posted November 3, 2004 So do you have an analogy/explanation for the reverse? I have been following the hibeta downtraining you suggested and particularly for P4.A2 15-38.Down EC, I am sometimes able to sustain a whole 5 minutes at some reasonably consistent level. I then take a break and when I start another session I sometimes find that my starting level is possibly twice that of where I finished, it then takes anywhere from 15 secs to 2 minutes to get back to lower level and the transition to that level is relatively immediate (rather than gradual). - Van Deusen wrote: > Lynn, > > This is a great question! I hope others will weigh in with their > philosophy and experience, but here's my two cents worth. > > This pattern is exactly what a coach would see in a gymnast or a > runner or swimmer. There is a period where the performance is solid > and stable, then fatigue begins to set in and everything falls apart. > The brain gets tired of sustaining a challenging state in the same > way. My inclination would be to say that stopping right at the end of > the plateau is likely to leave the client in a fairly solid place. > That's good. However, it may also be true that it is by pushing > through the deterioration that we really build stamina. > > My preference would be to pause the session when you see the plateau > starting to break up, and then take a longer than usual break--maybe a > couple minutes--and talk about how the client feels, if he has noticed > the cool plateau, etc. Then I'd challenge him to try one more 2 > minute stretch, to see if he can get back to that state and stay there > for a short final period. I think that would be the best of both worlds. > > Pete > > > > From: " lynn_gibbons " <pgibbons@...> > > Date: 2004/11/03 Wed PM 04:53:08 EST > > > > Subject: Watching the Trend line > > > > > > > Hi, > When training people for 20 mins in 2 minute intervals, I watch > the trend line. About 3/4 of the way through the training I see a > nice plateau that the client can keep going for about 2-5 minutes > then it gets all wild again for say the last 3-5 minutes. Should I > end the training as soon as it starts to get wild again, should I > get them recentered and bring the levels down again and end it with > a short plateau,or should I end it during that nice plateau before > the 20 mins is up? My impression is I don't get a good report when > I end it when it's wild but that may be biased because I'm looking > for problems then. Does anyone have any experience with this? > > Thanks, > Lynn > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2004 Report Share Posted November 4, 2004 , What you are describing is pretty much the same thing Lynn described but with an opposite training goal. Her client was trying to speed up the EEG, so when she reached a certain point in the " activating " training, the client began to slow down. You are trying to slow down the EEG in a particular area, so when you step out of this " deactivating " process, your brain tends to pop back up to faster speeds. If you think of your brain's activation pattern as being on a bungee cord, this might make sense. You train it away from the stable (albeit not necessarily functional or comfortable) state it has taken, and you stretch the cord. When you let go of the training (or get tired) it " bounces back " . Over time, with training, you ease the process of moving away from that state and even establish a new anchor for the cord in a " better " (i.e. more functional or comfortable) place. Pete > > From: Grigglestone <davidg@...> > Date: 2004/11/03 Wed PM 06:36:22 EST > > Subject: Re: Watching the Trend line > > So do you have an analogy/explanation for the reverse? I have been following the hibeta downtraining you suggested and particularly for P4.A2 15-38.Down EC, I am sometimes able to sustain a whole 5 minutes at some reasonably consistent level. I then take a break and when I start another session I sometimes find that my starting level is possibly twice that of where I finished, it then takes anywhere from 15 secs to 2 minutes to get back to lower level and the transition to that level is relatively immediate (rather than gradual). - Van Deusen wrote: > Lynn, > > This is a great question! I hope others will weigh in with their > philosophy and experience, but here's my two cents worth. > > This pattern is exactly what a coach would see in a gymnast or a > runner or swimmer. There is a period where the performance is solid > and stable, then fatigue begins to set in and everything falls apart. > The brain gets tired of sustaining a challenging state in the same > way. My inclination would be to say that stopping right at the end of > the plateau is likely to leave the client in a fairly solid place. > That's good. However, it may also be true that it is by pushing > through the deterioration that we really build stamina. > > My preference would be to pause the session when you see the plateau > starting to break up, and then take a longer than usual break--maybe a > couple minutes--and talk about how the client feels, if he has noticed > the cool plateau, etc. Then I'd challenge him to try one more 2 > minute stretch, to see if he can get back to that state and stay there > for a short final period. I think that would be the best of both worlds. > > Pete > > > > From: " lynn_gibbons " <pgibbons@...> > > Date: 2004/11/03 Wed PM 04:53:08 EST > > > > Subject: Watching the Trend line > > > > > > > Hi, > When training people for 20 mins in 2 minute intervals, I watch > the trend line. About 3/4 of the way through the training I see a > nice plateau that the client can keep going for about 2-5 minutes > then it gets all wild again for say the last 3-5 minutes. Should I > end the training as soon as it starts to get wild again, should I > get them recentered and bring the levels down again and end it with > a short plateau,or should I end it during that nice plateau before > the 20 mins is up? My impression is I don't get a good report when > I end it when it's wild but that may be biased because I'm looking > for problems then. Does anyone have any experience with this? > > Thanks, > Lynn > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.